Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members

http://tvguidemagazine.com/soaps/general-hospital-recruits-bruce-davison-5171.html

James Franco’s upcoming return to General Hospital as the psychotic artist Franco just got a little juicier now that Bruce Davison is joining the storyline. The Academy Award-nominated actor will do a three-episode cameo as Franco’s eurotrashy art dealer Wilhelm Van Schlagel. An ABC rep tells us that the Franco character, who seems homoerotically obsessed with mob hitman Jason Morgan (Steve Burton), will “return to town to wreak havoc on Jason and Michael and everyone else in Port Charles. His grand finale will be yet another art exhibition that’s more wild and crazy than his last one.”

Davison earned his Oscar nod for the 1990 AIDS drama Longtime Companion and plays Senator Robert Kelly in the X-Men movies. Credit GH’s Emmy-winning casting director Mark Teschner with the cool coup. “Bruce is one of my favorite actors—I met him in a restaurant a few years back and told him so,” Teschner says. “I wanted a very special, unique actor to be in scenes with Franco, and he was the first idea to pop into my head.”

Franco arrives June 30. Davison’s first airdate is not yet set, but look for him in early July.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This sounds ridiculous. Why in the hell are we supposed to get the vapors any time someone who once starred in a film is cast on GH? I already know how ashamed JFP and Luza are by the soap format, so why do they need to keep showing it?

Bruce Davison is fine but no one is going to tune in because of him. People actually tuned OUT because of Franco. So why does this keep happening?

Cast someone who used to be on a soap!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Guza and JFP would recast every single one of GH's cast members (save for the "dream team" of Geary, Benard and Burton, of course) with film actors if they could. They don't give a flying fig about pleasing anyone but themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's just so pathetic. Look at how cool we are, look at us, look at us. If they are that cool then why not recast Brenda with Brenda Vacarro. I'd probably enjoy that more than anything Brenda did post-1995 anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would love that. I forget, what feminine hygiene product did she start shilling for that sort of ruined her career?

Actually wait...

The writers job is to write, but isn't it the producers job and the PR dept to say "look at us, look at us!" Someone has to have that job and it isn't the writers or the actors, so it has to be the producers. Barnum would be proud. Ziegfeld too probably. Of course, they wouldn't be proud of the lack of audience, but they probably appreciate the carny barker efforts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ask yourself this question: has shilling for a feminine hygiene product ever been a boon to an actress's career? I didn't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Ziegfeld or Barnum would be proud if they continued to promote what led to a ratings drop.

That's what I don't get. This story was not very popular, if ratings were any indication. The whole thing ended up being a black eye to GH, as Franco all but mocked the experience in the press, and the press proceeded to act shocked that he would lower himself to appear on GH, then they made fun of the show when they watched him.

So why are they not only continuing with this, but also touting yet another hire who has nothing to do with soaps? Why are they so much more excited over this than they ever are with anyone they hire who actually has a soap background?

They seem ashamed of GH's history and ashamed of any actual daytime recognition, so that just makes this glee over these hires even more incongruous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

well to be fair to Guza's Franco story, none of his stories are very popular so this is just par for his course. It gets the same bad ratings all the other stories do, so they might as well try to muddy the issue with talks of stars and false auras of coolness and hiposity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy