Jump to content

The Sud's Report 4/2/10


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It doesn't even make any sense! He would have the reader believe that ABC Daytime has a homophobic agenda, so that's why they forced Ronald to remove Kyle and Oliver. So they're gonna show preferential treatment to AMC by "allowing" them to bring back a lesbian character?

Just shut it, Nelson. Shut it. Tell us that AMC is planning on bringing back Binks and leave it a that.

I do wonder why he doesn't mention the whole T. Sumpter thing, which I still think is fishier than a cathouse. Who told him that she asked to go on recurring? The only thing that could make sense in that is that she asked to go recurring but they turned her down, which is STUPID on them because they're not even using her. It's much easier to believe Nelson and/or his sources are playing make believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She doubts that she'll come to AMC, now that she lives in PA? Uhm, well you came to GH. LOL! That's in LA. Maybe she just doesn't like AMC anymore, or has a grudge against it. Idk, but the fact that she would come to GH, and not AMC really bums me out. I was hoping she would return after her stint at GH ended  :(

OMG at EJ threatening to kill his own father--with a letter opener! WTH?!

As always, Nelson is late with his 'news'. Guess he made this column a bit to late, before SOAPnet confirmed the Jean Hackanante news earlier this morning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm sure she'd be open to returning to AMC for a short-term stint if asked, just like GH. But, Skye coming back to Pine Valley for a short-term run would be pointless, and extremely hard to pull off. Her PV ties have been severed, and they would need to invest in the character long-term to get her established again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I find it funny that more and more his "reporting" is just buying the soap magazines and repeating everything. Or that he dropped the Tika story and the Kish drama behind scenes after the actors came and said he was wrong. Funny how getting called out gets him to change the tune.

Really goes to show that putting something out on a webpage makes everyone a "reporter"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I Agree. Unless she visited for an episode to say hi to Adam before he leaves then it would be difficult to pull off a short-term run. I think TPTB at AMC could re-integrate her character if given enough time but I doubt RC is staying on any soap for the longterm if she is so happy living in PA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay, well her reasons were that she had a mandate to reduce the size of the cast & she had another mandate to make the cast overall younger, so her reason for picking Donna to off was because she was too old.  So, is that what you understand? Or are you thinking of something else? Which if so, I would be delighted to hear about it!  She had arbitrarily picked 50 as the age people needed to be younger than.  And, that is why she got rid of both Bridget & Spencer Harrison.  And, getting rid of Bridget was another of her horrible ideas.  Why do you refer to her as the Face of the Show?
    • This is AWESOME, thank you for taking the time to post this! My first thought: My memory is a lot better than I thought it was, LOL! The first episode I clearly remember watching had a scene of Ed confronting Holly about Christina's paternity. He lamented how wonderful things had been over Christmas, so looks like I started watching the show early 1976. The only thing puzzling me is where is Evie? I thought she was around BEFORE Rita got involved with Tim, but maybe that's one gap in my memory. It makes Rita look slightly better--in that case, she didn't seduce Tim knowing her sister had a crush on him.
    • Oh, well.  At least he can cry into his hoodie.
    • Sorry, just realized I'd somehow lost a whole paragraph in that last post.
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  They should have brought Billy back in the early '90s for more drama with Hart and Blake. Maybe Blake would have gotten involved with him to try to ruin him in Roger's eyes, but realize under his sweet nature, Billy was a player himself.
    • Checked. Taggert last date, Wed, 7-19-23, so a long dadgummed time ago.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Watching the cult of Fetterman collapse is one of the few political bright spots for me. The best part  is watching all the people who built him up now decide they want to tear him down. I'll be fascinated to see how this ends for him. https://buckscountybeacon.com/2025/05/pennsylvanias-democratic-senator-john-fetterman-raises-alarms-with-outburst-at-meeting-with-union-officials/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Long ago, this Rachel fan channel uploaded a number of clips of Rachel with Felicia during the alcoholism story, and this one in particular stands out for me. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then you have this scene, which is the dark mirror of the above, especially the final moment: Felicia started out as camp bitch on a very dreary show (with Cecile being the only somewhat fun character around that point) and then got into a lot of comedy. Some of the comedy was very stupid, but many viewers still felt drawn to it, to Lily, Cecile, Cass, Felicia, Kathleen, Wallingford. There was a vibrancy which Dano fit well in, her fashions and melodrama parodied in a gentle way. This was missing in some of the long-suffering parts she'd had had on shows like ATWT. By the late '80s, especially after Wallingford's death, those times were gone, and Donna Swajeski added further misery to Felicia with the Gold Street backstory. Luckily, after a bit of time the show found a good framing for this new twist on Felicia. The stories with finding and losing a love from her past, learning that a woman she hated was the daughter she'd spent years searching for, sinking into alcoholism, they all fit into the type of material suited for the '40s and '50s screen goddesses.  When Dano tried some of this old weepy type of material when she went back to ABC, it mostly fell flat, as the atmosphere wasn't the same and her character always felt shoehorned in. It worked perfectly at this period on AW because you had Iris, you had Rachel, you had Donna - you had a number of tough-but-vulnerable women of a certain age, most of them grandmothers by this point, but still trying to find love, find themselves. This is what AW could have had earlier if they hadn't dumped Pat and Alice, but better late than never. This is an approach you saw more often on British soaps than on US soaps, which for a number of years respected women in that age group. Both UK and US soaps have done away with this, both countries having the ladies devolve into perpetual ingenues (with added doses of endlessly self-aware camp in the UK) or just being shipped off entirely.  You could even see that on AW with the treatment of Iris (shipped off, never to be mentioned again, too old to return), Donna (repeatedly humiliated and crippled), Felicia (regressed into degrading herself with married John), Rachel (mother to newborn twins, put into lengthy periods of trauma through her new relationship with Carl). 
    • I'm of a certain age where I caught some of Upton's final year and it was not great but Jean Holloway was worse. All I remember is Bambi, Bambi, Bambi!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy