Members Llantano Incorporated Posted March 27, 2010 Members Share Posted March 27, 2010 Brilliantly said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sylph Posted March 27, 2010 Members Share Posted March 27, 2010 Please do so as soon as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members NorrthCafe Posted March 27, 2010 Members Share Posted March 27, 2010 Langston told Ford what it was like living on her own and missing her parents. Given her past, how could she view Starr and Cole's all too common story as more romantic than the fact that Marrko stood up to his family and was willing to be disowned to be with her????? She can write a musical about a glorious teen pregnancy - one that the high school can't wait to produce, but not about her own loss and Marrko's love for her? BTW, I'm not knocking teen pregnancy, I just don't understand why the writers are pushing the 'star crossed lovers' thing with Starr and Cole to the point of pretending their storyline would be promoted as a great love for the ages to a high school crowd. If the actors can't sell it, there aren't enough plot devices in the world that will (see: Rex and Gigi). Add Teen Tessica and it's beginning to feel as if someone in the writers' room should be in therapy dealing with old high school issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mike_Cady fan Posted March 27, 2010 Members Share Posted March 27, 2010 wow as far as OLTL goes..i hope these stories get better....im not feeling the whole Langston thing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted March 27, 2010 Members Share Posted March 27, 2010 And the thing is, it's not even the idea of the story -- Langston being tempted to cheat on Markko -- that sucks. I was watching Fairman's interview with David Gregory, and he said that he initially read it as Ford, being from a big flashy and glamorous city, being an object of curiosity for Langston, who's always felt a wee bit bored with (supposedly) small town Llanview. That could/would have worked, but only if they could have taken the time to slowly tell this story, but alas, daytime doesn't take things slowly anymore. If they do, it's not done slowly in order to cover every possible base in the story but to keep the camera hogs on screen as long as possible while writing as little story as possible (ie: hearing "bag of blood" in the dialog for months on end). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DeliaIrisFan Posted March 28, 2010 Members Share Posted March 28, 2010 Since he couldn't very well admit that his show is pretty bad and that 99.9% of the criticism is justified - and that he wouldn't be writing the majority of things that are now happening on this show if he weren't being micromanaged by the network, which I personally would like to believe to be the case, having been a fan of some of the things he has done and came so close to doing on OLTL - I actually think he was kind of diplomatic. He acknowledged that there are well thought out criticisms of the show being posted on the internet, which he has found himself agreeing with. What he said about the rest of the criticism just being mean-spirited and pointless was BS, but I'm sure there are some - not many - fans out there with agendas who are just looking to find fault when those agendas are not happening. By equating that element with the intelligent criticism that he admits is out there - even though it's hardly 50/50 - he managed to validate at least some of the criticism while avoiding publicly stating that much of the product is deserving of criticism these days. Maybe I'm grasping at straws, but I can't hate the guy or believe that the majority of what's wrong with OLTL is his fault. Carlivati looked pained every time Fairman praised him for the Kyle and Fish story, and how could he not have been, knowing what was coming down the pike? When Carlivati eventually leaves OLTL/it's canceled, I would love to see a candid interview with him about his experiences. He's clearly seen a lot in his years at OLTL, and to have graduated from law school (a good law school, at that) and been hired and promoted so many times as a writer he must be an extremely smart and articulate guy. I think that some of his interviews have belied that, probably because he is trying to avoid saying that will get him into trouble. Unfortunately, if the "professional" journalists who by and large have access to soap writers these days have nothing more meaningful to ask him than whether John and Natalie will get back together, it's probably easy enough for him to keep the conversation at that level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members EricMontreal22 Posted March 28, 2010 Members Share Posted March 28, 2010 Yes but this whole interview was done 5 or so weeks back wasn't it? When the show still had some possibilities Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Leia Posted March 28, 2010 Members Share Posted March 28, 2010 RC sounds like someone else in this interview. When he first took the position his enthusiasm was poignant towards Llanview, the fans etc. Now he sounds like some of the Headwriters out there who have a slight antagonistic attitude towards the fans. This is another example of a soap journalist who turned into a gushing fanboy and lost the ability to cover the subject with any depth and nuance. All the soap journalism amounts to these days is what's going to happen next and to whom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.