Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    4961

  • Taoboi

    4020

  • Cat

    4011

  • NothinButAttitude

    3972

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

RHOV


I can't stand Jody and Mia. Sad, ugly women trying to pass as ab fab and uber-bitchy doesn't work for me. Now they have Ben Stiller in drag in their team and this poor thing is more pathetic than them. Poor Ben wants to create some drama all the time, she tries to be interesting but all I see are scenes from a movie where Ben Stiller tries to pass as a woman.

Robin honey, why do you really want to sing? She comes out so stupid and desperate being obsessed with this. And now singing with a kid..

I like Ronnie, Mary and Ioulia. Too bad beautiful Mary can't stand for herself when a bunch of ugly drag queens make fun of her.


BH

I love Lisa, Yolanda and Brandi a>)

I wish I was a houseguest at Ken and Lisa's lol

Kim in an intervention for Taylor was so funny. She is a mess and she thinks she can get involved in other people's drama? And Kyle follows her because as always she is a sucker for other people's problems. Kyle thinks she is a popular highschool cheerleader and tries to live her life like that. I think that she has more sceletons in her closet than anybody else and that's the reason she wants everybodu occupied with gossip about her friends. She is lucky that Kim is all over the place and she can't expose her and I don't buy her perfect marriage.

Marissa seemed like a nice girl, but she is always putting her poor husband down. Why is she doing this? I liked her at first, but she seems very mean and she is trying too hard to create an interesting persona. She is telling us all the time that she is very funny, that she thinks like a guy etc, but all I see is a woman desperate for attention.

I am team Brandi all the way, but for some reason I can't hate Adrienne. As a matter of fact I think she is rather nice and Paul is the real problem.

Edited by Elsa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

YIKES @ Lisa!

I knew it! With just the OC airing, I knew they had to air at least a RH spin-off. Bravo hasn't gone without at least two RH shows airing for quite a long time now.

Has anyone seen the previews to that new Bravo show, Married to Medicine? It's taking over Atlanta's spot on Sunday nights... and it looks to be a doozy. Almost like a RHOA copy, but with a doctor's wives twist. Lots of drama and fighting!

http://www.hollywood.com/news/tv/55001250/bravo-married-to-medicine-new-show-doctors-atlanta-trailer?page=all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

are you saying that is Lisa Wu? I don't believe it. That doesn't even look like her

Yet ANOTHER ATL reality show. I'll probably at least give it a try. LOL...why do these shows always have to have one token white girl Edited by Cheap21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL Cheap -- I don't doubt that its her granted she looks like a cross between Mimi & Deelishis from Flavor of Love (granted she has shorter hair now from what I saw in her recent magazine article). Lisa ain't doing sh!t so I don't see why that isn't her. Rough times and all with no business ventures and her second divorce... and probably no work for real since I doubt she's getting these acting jobs. Maybe homegirl was caught on a rough day because Lisa was always dressed somewhat nice.

Edited by London
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL dunno - it looks like her to me just rough.

She even tweeted about it from the date they were taken.

Someone said she looked unrecognizable and she tweeted them back saying it was just a bad pic.


Ok, honest question: Would ya'll watch all these spin-offs Bravo keeps giving half of the Housewives? I just read that Phaedra may get one now and it'll be like a court format show dealing with her legal knowledge.

Edited by London
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

huh.png Phaedra is fine as part of an ensemble but she is not interesting enough to carry a spin off. That premise sounds stupid.

As much as I detest Wig, I know she has a huge fanbase and can see people watching her trailer trash show. Phaedra? Um no. She is well liked enough but I can't see people flocking to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL Cheap - we'll agree to disagree and if it turns out that its NOT her I'll definitely edit out even though I guess the original source of those photos is some blogger Lisa is friends with who gave the lowdown on bumping into her. People have off days and that look is not for her, dunno if she has a team now or not or what type of money she has -- everyone looks off nowadays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with you and even would say that about Wig to be honest. I'm definitely interested to see the ratings this time around... I just don't see it. She doesn't do anything - she has a wig line (I wonder if it gets sold) and she pops out kids, that's sadly how I look a her at the moment. I can't sit around watching that. I just don't see a hustle with Kim and never have. So I'll definitely be interested in seeing what the future holds for her if and when her name pops up.

Kandi I can kinda see because she has so much going on and trying to shape her brand but again she's not that interesting, even as an ensemble cast member on RHOA.

I would kinda rather see a legal show format but I doubt it'd be on Bravo granted they may surprise me) and it'd be at least new, no matter how stupid it sounds but can her ass even be a judge? I thought she was just a straight lawyer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Or Megan is shot by mobsters as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy