Jump to content

Y&R: Potpourri Thread 4


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 409
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

pre-YouTube, Walton's Jill was the only one I knew. I love watching clips of Brenda as Jill on YouTube, but the best thing for Bill Bell and the show to do was to allow the character to grow and while Dickson's diva behavior forced the recast, I feel like it was necessary for the maturity of the character.

Aside from that, Jess Walton is quite the sweetheart. And probably the only Y&R actor I'd want to be locked in with a room. And Kristoff too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Michael Fairman didn't ask one critical question. How sad. Not one. Even Bill Bell, Doug Marland or Agnes Nixon make mistakes.

http://michaelfairmansoaps.com/2010/the-young-and-the-restless/the-maria-arena-bell-and-paul-rauch-interview-the-young-and-the-restless/

Then why don't you write them fighting as they did during the 80s and 90s. Due to Phillip, Cane, Billy, etc. they have plenty reason. Their relationship now seems more about being pals (who make up) and that overall mother-daughter connection.

Good to know you have a little pre-rush checklist. Now get that shyt done. Dayum. Everything he listed he's failed on. No subtext, writing sucks, acting is flat and the show looks like catshyt.

Clearly you're wasting your time.

You witnessed the introduction of two of the greatest black characters ever and you write so poorly for them?

Crack is whack. Retire. And if Darius popped so much, why isn't he propped like Michael Muhney who joined the show and instantly appears in more episodes than any male character? Billy Miller? Everyone else who is white? Why do black people like Olivia and Malcolm return and get marginalized if they're so great. He appeared in FOUR episodes during his first month back.

Bullshyt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, please. Did you really expect him to tell the truth? This is just a bullsh!t interview full of [!@#$%^&*]. They're just... Talking. Nonsense. Everything that crosses their mind. And of course, since their egos are sizable, they're going to talk how the writing is great, how production values are superb and haven't dropped in quality, how they're really in sync, blah, blah. Just classic sh!t stuff. :)

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also love the flavour of fakeness, that inescapable feeling of how someone is talking... Better not say what... :rolleyes: For example:

Don't you just sense the flood of unhealthy enthusiasm, a kind of logorrhoea: OMG, I am so overwhelmed with the gorgeousness of my writing! OMG! I'm, like, I'm fabulous!

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I couldn't make it through the whole article. I didn't even see that quote about Colleen. It's ridiculous. They have no shame if they are bringing up Victor getting her heart. And do you notice they put NO burden on Victor or his behavior, it's all about the sacrifice the Abbotts made? Who cares if Victor screws them over.

They must be getting bad feedback on Daisy to justify her the way they did, without being prompted. The only thing that "pops" with her is the blood vessels of viewers who are traumatized by the overbite.

Paul Rauch stamp?

Weak women.

Whites only.

Crappy production values.

Yes, it's the stamp of approval.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved the beginning:

:huh::unsure:

1. If you know only one way to tell a story... Then you need to burn your diploma! And go back to creative writing classes! It really had no purpose then.

2. Notice the exaggerated use of demonstrative pronouns: these, those, that... It really tells a lot. She has no idea what she is talking about. Absolutely no clue.

3. If she can't even write her own interview, make it flow and have coherence, it's really stupid to hope she can write number 1 daytime drama. Just ridiculous. This interview – her answers – is really badly put together. Baaadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy