Jump to content

HBO: Game of Thrones


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I'm watching this through Netflix (which means I get to hear the commentary too, which is nice). I just finished episode 4.

I'm not unspoiled, although I don't know every detail to come.

Overall I enjoy the show. The casting for the Starks was superb, especially Michelle Fairley as Catelyn. Catelyn's insecurities course through her and eat at what is a very intelligent and at times very kind woman. She's such a rich character, and bleeds charisma and intensity in every scene. The only casting I think comes close is Sean Bean as Ned (amazing, amazing, amazing), and Lena Headey and Nikolas-Coster Waldjau as Cersei and Jaime - these characters should be loathsome (especially with the way Jaime runs people down to make himself feel more important), but the acting is sublime and nuanced in ways I can't describe.

By and large the casting is fine, especially when the writing is there. I must say I was very disappointed by Aiden Gillen as Littlefinger. He's smarmy and obvious from the start, thus making Ned and Catelyn seem gullible for believing his spin. This helped make Catelyn taking Tyrion prisoner seem more rushed and inexplicable, which is a shame. I can see why George Martin said he was disappointed with how Littlefinger came across on the show. I remember GIllen being very smarmy and obvious on the little I watched of the UK QAF, but this isn't the same role...

I feel a little sorry for Emilia Clarke, because she's good as Dany, if unpolished at times, but the whole story is so murky and offputting, especially the message of rape turning to love and empowerment through rape (and apparently some of this would have been even worse if the actors hadn't dealt with some of it during filming). Her brother makes me cringe with his histrionics that just OTT and false. That scene he had with Louise from Hollyoaks where she was turned on by talk of dragons was so much better than anything else he's had in these episodes - in that moment I saw the actor's talent. The way it's filmed also feels very cheaply done - it reminds me of a porny version of Xena or Hercules, mixed in with the Solid Gold "native" dancers who have boobs! and kill each other! Poor Jason Mamoa with that shoe polish on his face that throws me out of his scenes. Otherwise he's been decent and complex. I do like the basic concepts of Dany's empowerment (even if it was through rape - ugh), family history, the dragons, her insane father and the jagged throne that cut him over and over (brilliant imagery...), so I am hoping that things will pick up.

At first I struggled with Arya and Tyrion because the writing for them was a little too precious for me, but I've grown to care more about them. Everything with Tyrion felt very one note (he's an imp! he likes the common people but lashes out because of what life has done to him! and so forth), but the scenes with Jon on the wall went a long way toward making me care about him. Jon has such a purity as a character, an innate goodness, and it goes a long way to help make the stories of him helping the poor and weak on the wall more palatable and less like some sort of elitist fairy tale (that and Tyrion pointing out to him that he's had opportunities they never had). I do hope the long monologues from wall people hating the winter will stop soon - the best monologue on winter was that incredible story from Old Nan, moment that made me just stop and stare at the TV, the whole thing was so perfect.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's exciting to read your thoughts as you discover the show! I recognize a lot of them as what I experienced back then.

Meanwhile, I've been reading A Storm of Swords. What a great book!

It's been making me rethink Season 3 (which I thought was a great season) and how, in hindsight, Theon's torture porn doesn't seem as bad as it did in a once-a-week basis.

Edited by YRBB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just wanted to add: Catelyn's speech in Episode 2 of Season 3 is jawdropping. I had no idea she felt that way - I thought the subject of Jon Snow was profoundly sealed and vaulted deep within her mind. That was incredible work from Michelle Fairley, who hadn't gotten as much to do in Season 2.

The Tyrells - the women, anyway - seem very, very smart. They're a lot cleverer than not only Joffrey but also Cersei, who to me has seemed utterly at a loss and often flailing about since the glory of her early victories in the first season faded. She knew a few tricks from being raised by her father, she'd gotten comfortable manipulating things under Robert, but with an uncontrollable son she helped coronate, and faced with people her equal if not smarter (not the least of which is Tyrion), she's been struggling to stay afloat. Be careful what you wish for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You should def give the first one a try though Cheap! I love the books so much more than the television show but the tv show is amazing itself for having brought the characters to life in such an authentic way (for the most part). Plot issues aside and little quirks here or there I do think GoT is pretty amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

The showrunners' plan is for the show to last 7 seasons.

Hmmmm not sure how they'll achieve that when it took a whole season to tell less than half of book 3. But perhaps, once they finish with season six, they'll skip whatever storylines they feel are necessary and get to the end point. Then again, it might not be that impossible, especially since they know the end of it. The problem there being, of course, that I don't think they'll be allowed to end the show in the same way as the books before the books are published.

I'd be perfectly happy with 10 seasons, though biggrin.png

http://insidetv.ew.com/2014/03/11/game-of-thrones-7-seasons/

Edited by YRBB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

New trailer is interesting but overall I have no idea what they're thinking in terms of ending in 7 seasons. The books themselves probably don't have an ending and yet they're somehow going to wrap it up.

That's completely fine but I hope they clear it up and explicitly say that this is an alternate universe or something. Cuz I refuse to believe anything they show in this upcoming season in terms of storyline....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

PrinceofSunspear, I know you've talked some about the books vs shows. I'm sure you don't want to rehash that, so I won't ask you to, but have you ever watched those videos of the woman on Youtube with the pink hair and the robot? She vents a lot about that subject. I don't agree with all she says (I don't hate Sansa), but it's interesting.

I'm on way to finishing up season 1...in a while I guess, as I am watching through Netflix. I just finished the one yesterday where Ned was arrested.

(I'm mostly spoiled up to late season 3 and some of the book stuff, although watching is different than reading)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't really looked on Youtube for other fans assessment in that regard. Could you provide her name or a link by PM If you don't mind? I would be curious to listen to of them just to see what areas she's concerned about.

I never used to understand why people would get upset about book to movie adaptations but with GoT I'm starting to see to see why it matters to people. When companies and producers or whomever go to such lengths to just tear about the basic foundation of a storyline or a world or a even a character it just boggles my mind. Esp when its such a great story to begin with which doesn't require that much tinkering. I ran across this article on the HuffingtonPost which talks about the 9 essential things that GoT tv fans need to know regarding the books vs the series and its all so true. Yet it doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of just how radically different in some ways the show is and how it just ruins the full impact/true meaning of some of the scenes from the book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Well, they usually weren't on the show at the time for long until the late 90's. But yeah, they really deserved a story centered on them, and not through the lens of Reva.
    • Chelsea was doing the absolute most today! Why was she introducing her sister to a woman she doesnt know? That whole scene was embarrassing. Madison needs to stay away from her bc she is too immature
    • Gosh, what a waste with Lunacy. Why have her live with $B, reveal Finn, pardon her, etc What makes this story incredibly hollow is that what Luna is asking isn't unreasonable - to spend time with her cousin father. She's not asking to move in with them. How hard with it be for Finn to throw her a bone by, say, I'll meet you for lunch/coffee once at week at the hospital cafeteria. Lunacy isn't going to hurt Finn. In fact, all her crimes were related to finding her father and it turns out to be someone she's loved her entire life. Instead of course-correcting the nonsense of last summer, Brad somehow found a way to make this worse! That's a skill... Of all the younger actors B&B has cast during the past 5 years, LY has shown the most growth and range. Why get rid of her? 
    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
    • I wonder if Linda Bloodworth-Thomason had Kim in mind for any of her other characters/series. If they intended Allison Sugarbaker (Julia Duffy's character) to be more in line with who Suzanne was/Delta Burke's portrayal-persona, then I think Kim would have aced that. Yes, it would have been odd, Kim having previously played a different character (from a different family), but Designing Women wouldn't have been the first show with that issue. Or maybe Kim could have played Beth Broderick's role on Hearts Afire. Or Patricia Heaton's role on Women of the House.
    • Sony is probably waiting until Y&R’s lease is up as well. All of TV City is going to be gutted, so they have to relocate at some point. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy