Jump to content

Headwriters who change with their shows


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I was just thinking about some of daytime's current headwriters and some past headwriters who seem to tell the same stories everywhere they go and make each of their soaps seem exactly the same. Then I started to think of some headwriters who seemed very different from one show to the other. I thought of Doug Marland, who has been written about here lately as making ATWT somewhat safe and soppy. I haven't seen a lot of his GH work, but his GL work seems very different to me. There is much more of an edge, especially in scenes with Carrie, Diane Ballard, or Vanessa, who did not have the gloss which helped balance Barbara and Lucinda in their bitchy moments.

Vanessa is the fly in the ointment everywhere she goes, setting people off against each other, pouting and flirting and interfering. Diane is the dutiful secretary who slowly, methodically collects information until she finally feels sure enough to give in to her delusions about her boss, Alan Spaulding, at which point she shatters and goes completely off the rails. And of course Nola, who is so real and human, and raw, even when she is "redeemed" after her lies to Kelly are exposed. There's much more of a touch of volatility to Nola and to Tony Reardon, and Maureen at that time was not yet the patron saint, she was more guarded.

So are there any headwriters you think manage, or managed, to adopt a different style of writing or tone with each of their soaps, or tried to live up to the character of the soap they were writing for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Interesting topic.

My initial reaction is that there are very very few headwriters whose styles aren't essentially the same as they move from show to show.

I do remember being very surprised to find out that James E. Reilly had been part of the headwriting team of GL in the early 90s and an associate headwriter on Ryan's Hope because, up until then, I thought all he was capable of was the kind of stuff he did on DOOL and Passions. It makes me think that he could very well have written a show like AMC or Loving or OLTL, which are shows I never would have thought he was compatible with before, true to form.

I also think Sally Susman Morina did a pretty good job of adapting her style to the unique DOOL she inherited from Reilly. I remember thinking that the former headwriter of Generations was such an odd choice to replace Reilly and that it would be such a drastic change for the show, but it wasn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even Reilly's work in his DAYS stints seemed very different. There was much more storytelling and tighter plotting in his first run. Even when stories dragged on, they had a big payoff. In his second run, his stories seemed to drag on just for the sake of it, and the payoff, if there was any, was less worthwhile. There also seemed to be much more of a weird sadistic pseudo-camp. Perhaps this translated from his Passions run.

That's a good point about Sally Susman Morina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I heard when Slesar took over for Capitol, everyone assumed he'd make it into another mystery drama. I read he was good, but that his Capitol focused more on political intrigue.

I hate that they canned him for James Lipton, who I heard was dreadful. But that's typical Conboy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As a matter of fact, Henry Slesar did write very briefly for SEARCH; and yes, his SEARCH was heavy on intrigue and mystery (although, to be fair, the show had drifted in that direction before he even arrived).

And as for CAPITOL...yeah, he did include some EON-esque mystery, such as the one surrounding Jarrett Morgan's real identity, as well as the requisite political intrigue. Slesar also emphasized family drama, though, particularly in the backstory of how Myrna came to be archenemies with Clarissa.

The only instance where a network and/or sponsor informed Slesar not to focus exclusively on "crime stories" was at OLTL. Yet, as Slesar pointed out years later during an interview w/ SOW, when he came aboard, OL had two murder mysteries (with two separate culprits) running simultaneously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not really. However, he only head-wrote two shows, DAYS and GH, and both shows more-or-less emphasized the same things (i.e., action/adventure stories, supercouples, etc.). He worked on ANOTHER WORLD, GENERATIONS and SANTA BARBARA, but only as an AHW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Did Slesar do the stuff at OLTL with Rob and Alex Crown, or was that the Corringtons?

What did you think of his work at SFT and Capitol?

I guess with shows like SFT, or Loving, which had so much turnover, it must have been almost impossible to have time to put your own imprint onto the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Corringtons. Slesar joined OL after P&G replaced him at EDGE OF NIGHT, in '83. By the time that story began, however, Slesar had already moved onto CAPITOL.

His stuff @ SEARCH was "before my time," as they say. I do remember his work on CAPITOL, however, as being the most consistent that show had ever been. Before he arrived, CAPITOL was apparently notorious for dropping stories just when they started getting good. Of course, when the ratings fell during his tenure, CBS believed he was responsible, so Conboy had no choice but to fire him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Frankly, I think people make too much out of Slesar's tenure w/ OLTL. Yes, he was officially Co-HW w/ Sam Hall...for awhile. To tell you the truth, though, I think Hall ran that show more than anyone.

You have to remember, although EDGE's ratings on ABC were miserable (most likely, b/c not all affiliates cleared it), wherever it did air, it usually won its timeslot, and carried some of the most loyal fans in daytime. ABC realized Slesar had that ability to find, hook and keep an audience, so when P&G replaced him w/ Lee Sheldon, they (ABC) snatched up Slesar in the hopes that he would do for one of their shows what he'd done for EDGE (and to a lesser extent, SOMERSET). My hunch is that the OL gig was more-or-less a holding place for him until the HW'ing gig opened up @ GH. Unfortunately, things just didn't turn out the way ABC had planned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unfortunately, CBS gave up on CAPITOL completely the minute they heard Papa Bell was even considering developing another soap. After that point, it didn't matter to them how CAPITOL went out, just so it did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • GROSS. Michael Swan was hot back in his ATWT days. Now he's 76 and WAY past his hot years.    
    • Since she kidnapped, locked up and tried to kill her father's wife I'd say that is still a pretty big deal
    • I'm good with the gushing, too. There aren't many soap icons like John Black, and that's important to celebrate and remember. And yes, life does go on for other characters, but as they say, timing is everything. Going sky diving the day before the funeral? And during a week of shows that were so powerful emotionally? No.    
    • No. There might have been a slight pause for dramatic effect after his "death," but pretty soon after they showed him in France getting plastic surgery and getting involved with his doctor, then planning with her to bring Christina to France. (She thought he had good reason to do it; she wasn't a bad person or anything). Now that I think of it, there must have been some kind of pause before that, during the 70s. Rita was accused of killing a private patient for an inheritance when she lived in Texas. Part of the backstory was that Roger had been there, too. Not sure exactly when or how long that was.
    • I've already stated that I don't like Doug being written as this meek and submissive. It was so lame watching him leave her like that. Vanessa can divorce him, but she then needs to get her thot ass into therapy. She's not only having sex with every guy she runs into, but is now having  sex with a skeevy perv on a poker table. I'm going to give the BTG some credit here. For months, many on this board were delighting in the Vanessa/Joey flirting and what they saw as chemistry. I think we're now seeing what the writers always intended -- that Joey is a disgusting POS wannabe mobster.
    • John Black actually was the ultimate good guy soap hero. So I don’t mind the town gushing over him. It’s deserved.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy