Jump to content

So why aren't soap actors more supportive of the genre?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I've been curious about something. There are quite a few soap actors out there and still performing who have made careers out of being an actor on a soap. Nothing wrong with that at all. But with that I am curious.

So many of them seem to be settled to the fact that the genre is going to be gone within the next so many years. I base this on comments from many of the actors.

Thorston Kaye recently commented on his leaving AMC because yet of his family ties but he also commented on the fact that he didn't see much longevity in the show so "why" make the move or commute. He didn't state it exactly that way but that was the gist of what he said. Perhaps it's because he lived through 1 soap cancellation.

Steve Burton with GH, while continuing to claim the demos are still decent, also has said the genre is in it's last years.

I believe Eric Braeden, regardless of the fact he's still at Y&R and re-signed, has made similar comments.

Now I can't speak for any of the actresses. I'm not sure any of the more "well known" actresses have made comments.

I'm wondering why these actors have not made a more concerted effort to band together to try and promote and help the shows more. Why don't they do more events? Why don't the networks sponsor more events? Why don't the big guns on these shows, the Susan Lucci's at AMC, the Steve Burton's at GH, the Eric Braeden's at Y&R, the Susan Flannery's at B&B, do more collectively to try and draw attention and promote than they do? Why not go on talk shows like Ellen or even nighttime shows like Leno or the late late nighttime talk shows.

They all just seem to be re-signed to their fate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Susan Lucci has gone on TV quite a bit to promote AMC.

Eric Braeden has probably always seen Y&R as a meal ticket and has looked down on the show. Steve Burton also clearly sees the show as a meal ticket. He left and he only went back when he was a loser outside of soaps.

Susan Flannery is not a big name outside of the soap world, so I don't think she would even really be asked on much even if she wanted to be. She is also not in the best of health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ITA. Other Susan Lucci, Eric Braeden, Cameron Mathison, Kelly Monaco and Jack Wagner, the general public do not recognize soap actors. No one has a clue who Maurice Benard and Steve Burton are, despite their popularity with soap fans. It would be near impossible for even widely known soap actors to get guest spots on the highly competitive late night talk shows. ABC will put the average soap actor on the View, but it is extremely difficult for them to get guest spots on popular syndicated shows like Oprah, Ellen, and Rachel Ray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

These actors have to think about things like eating and paying their mortgages. It's not up to them to save "the genre." On the contrary if anybody can see why the genre has died, it's them. If you know your company is going out of business, your job isn't to try and save it, it's to get your ass another job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And I have on at least two occasions been watching OLTL when someone walked in the room and mistook Robin Strasser for Susan Lucci, so some people only have about half a clue.

The thing is, I don't know what it's like to NOT be a soap fan, I was just born into one of those families where watching stories was a part of life. So I don't know how non-soap fans feel when they see a soap star pop up on a late night show or wherever. Of course fans get all warm, fuzzy and excited inside, and I bet folks whose parents or grandparents watched and they have hazy memories of sorylines and faces get a little kick out of it. But you know, there are plenty of primetime shows I don't watch, movies I don't plan to see, and if I'm uninterested in a person being interviewed, I tune out or flip the channel... viewers could easily do the same with a soap actor, it's not like they don' DESERVE to be seen and interviewed more often. Problem is, soaps are treated as novelty, whenever a soap star or actor who got their start on soaps is on a talk show, they inevitably go on and on about all of the silly soapy things their character went through. i remember Erika Slezak being interviewed on Regis or Rosie, I don't remember, but they showed a clip of her chewing up scenery during the DID s/l and I felt that embarrassed feeling in my stomach because to a non-fan with absolutely no context, it looked like pure OTT cheese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Remember how your mother used to say to you, "Don't make me embarrass you in public!"? I think the soaps could use a bit of that, I think they DO need the right people (i.e., the Susan Luccis, not the Forbes Marches) to call these IIC out, to speak their minds and give the press the Who What When Why and How on the slow demise of soaps. Imagine if at least one actor from every soap still on the air wrote an op-ed to the Times, or hell, People magazine. No, a lot of execs wouldn't like it, but a helluva lot of fans would, and just *maybe* it would prompt *someone* to kick his or her butt into gear and "prove us wrong." People don't like looking bad. It's that simple. Strip TPTB of their lame exuses, pin them to the wall on what soaps have been missing and fans have been asking for for the last twenty years. And if TPTB sit around on their hands until cancellation, well there you have it, no one up top was that interested in saving soaps to begin with. I'm telling you, when actors start coming out of their mouths with this stuff after cancellation, it's entirely too late and I really don't want to hear it. I can respect anyone's desire to remain employed, but it would be refreshing to see at least one person have the balls to speak out. And it's going to take a popular, intelligent, working (so they can't play the bitter actor angle), brave, and yes, financially secure actor to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I assume they feel the way I do whenever I see people fawning all over some sports star I've never heard of (which is most of them). You know they're important to somebody but that doesn't make you care. Being a soap fan is kind of the same as being a theatre fan. Nobody I know watches the Tonys but every year there I am in front of the TV with my marked up ballot singing along with the musical numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem is how many think that TPTB are the problem. I think the majority probably feel the same way the showrunners do. THe names I mentioned above are all people who have spoken out in print in some fashion about the demise of soaps. None of them seem to be blaming anything or anyone other than the same things the media says, changing lifestyles, demographics, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right, and for me, a lot of that falls under the category of lame excuses. A lot of people dvr their primetime, or watch it online, buy dvd box sets... yes, soaps are 5x/week but if programming is good, people find a way. Soaps, for the most part, simply have not been as good as they once were and people working IN daytime are to blame for that, not the people who are not watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • NBC Press Photo, text, from Jason47's files on daytimeroyalty

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab this episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). I thought we had the full HD version of ep.3170 on the YouTube channel, but it appears they added the wrong episode but labelled it 3170. 
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's a name I haven't heard in a minute. Thanks! 
    • Well, since I'm still up unexpected past my growing-into-it bedtime. lol.   I finally got to rewatch Monday's. I even rewatched Friday's to take it all in. Now that we got the reveal and hit the climax of the SilkPress Sheila storyline, now we get to watch the aftermath and/or turns that come with its climax. So far, so good. Friday left us with three cliffhangers. And what I found surprising was how I felt about them over a rewatch.    I know some of you all felt a way about the dialogue during Kat vs Eva. I remember liking it more the first time around and it was nice for them to have these scenes to establish more of a frenemy vibe for them going forward. That still held up. But I found myself agreeing with you all about that dialogue. lol. Still, it was nice to have both of their POVs.   Second up was Silk Press Sheila vs the Duprees. And I was happy to get a brief spat with Dani in there. But the rest standouts for me was Anita and Martin. Haters can hate and given the tail end of the episode, I will agree to a fault, but Brandon has impressed and he was on fire on Monday and had great subtle work on Friday. And that subtle work made it all the better. Like I believe I said when I was watching...BC has a much better grip on his character and seems to be realizing what his tics are so has started to be able to know when to turn it up and when to dial it down. And for the most part (emphasis on most), he got that. Meanwhile, TT was giving fierceness, and I was here for every minute of it. Her reading SilkPress. Her being quip about it. Her 'BE STILL.' Ooooo she had a chokehold on me as Anita gave what I was expecting her to SilkPress. WORTH THE WAIT. I also loved Vernon's CHOOSE SILENCE. I wonder though if SilkPress will figure out Martin's condition from her observing Anita and Vernon with him.   And speaking of worth it...Oooo YES Nicole vs Ted was worth totally worth it. Oooooo I knew DD would nail it, and it was all so well done. The fight between the part of Nicole who is a therapist vs Nicole as a woman who wants to express how she feels. And being so angry. And how there would be moments when it would shoot out of her. And how she would restrain herself. But how she felt she should not be restrain. Just the levels of processing and layers. And DD played it all so well. I do wish Maurice gave just a little bit more, but overall, I thought he did a good job even if it was just Ted coming across as a deadbeat and not at all redeemable. And Kat being there for her mother was so beautiful.   Minority, but I love the montage though yes, it did run a little long. Given how the Duprees like to bond (and also as I mentioned from my own very recent family experiences), it did not seem out of place to me.     That said...let's see how the aftermath worked in today's episode. Overall. Cuz RC can be hit or miss. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy