Jump to content

ATWT Canceled


Recommended Posts

  • Members

No offense but some of her blogs and her "ignornace" and lack of knowledge on certain topic she has discussed in the past has amazed me. She's not stating anything here that hasn't been paraded around online. I read online how Soapnet is doing poorly on message boards but they a report comes out indicating how their viewership has risen and they are being picked up by more "cable" affiliates. And I don't blame Frons. Like MTV, all they are doing is what they need to to increase viewership. There is nothing new or fresh about what she's blogging here - most is common knowledge just packaged around an alleged "expert". I don't dislike her but I also don't think she's adding anything here people don't already know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 533
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I knew I wasn't crazy because Deborah Blackwell (is that her name? Former head of SOAPnet?) always touted the various successes. If you look, the most successful shows on the network are the daytime soaps. AMC, OLTL and Y&R in particular. The daytime lineup of classic soaps and this INCLUDES when Knots Landing and Dallas were on. Knots was very popular and they renewed it's contract, which was reported in TV Guide. The show was pulled when they decided to rebrand with 90210, One Tree Hill, etc. although there was still room for the show.

And she brings up a good point...why don't they try and add a soap from the UK or Australia? It would be better than that awful Canadian programming they import. Hollyoaks is centered around teens which is what Frons wants. It would be perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, you're not offending me. I don't even know why I brought that link up, knowing what the reaction would be!

I think she has certain experience with Nielsen given that she said in Toups' interview that after college she got a job in "Columbia-TriStar’s TV research department – the department that handles Nielsen ratings and focus groups".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll bet Knots Landing and Dallas were not attracting the "demo group" they wanted. When they broadcast shows like 90210 and One Tree Hill that tells me who they are aiming for. And I think Being Erica has actually been a success for them oddly enough. Maybe the Canadian imports are cheaper who knows. But I think there is a feeling Americans won't gravitate to british shows for some reason. Any of their shows that have been aired in the US have been either on public television or on cable. Of course that is what Soapnet is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think that there's anything wrong with trying to stop cancellation at all. My point is that people complain and complain and say that the show's been in the shitter since Marland heaved his last sigh, and when the network decides to end the show, there's suddenly an outpouring of "Oh, oh, I love this show, I've watched it since I was yay-high to a grasshopper, I wish damnation to CBS for even thinking about canceling it!" Something in that equation is over-the-top. Either the complaining of how much the show is the pits or the waxing rhapsodic of how great it is.

I concede that rallying the troops to get a higher quality show probably wouldn't work because it would mean an enormous amount of supporters who all want the exact same thing. A cult, if you will.

In regards to Lifetime, I think that's a lost cause. ATWT and GL, no matter how much they've tried to sex and youth those shows up over the last ten years, are still "old folks' shows" to so many. Lifetime finally decided to start going for a slightly younger audience (not the 90210/OTH/OC audience, but the Grey's audience...you know, white girls in their late 20s and early 30s). They dropped The Golden Girls in February, and most of the movies they air now are from the last couple of years, as opposed to when they'd show nothing but cheesy (but awesome) TV movies from the 80s and 90s. Not to mention...ugh...Project Runway. I don't see them wanting ATWT. DAYS or GH, maybe...maybe even Y&R, but not ATWT.

And British/Australian soaps :( I wish someone would show them somewhere. Even if they're just as frustrating as our soaps, I just like the idea of having more to choose from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And I love how some posters have acted as RoastMaster of Ceremonies over ATWT, as if it's so offensive to their delicate sensibilities to have an "arthritic castoff" disgracing the airwaves.

Lifetime is already "in the soap business"---what is "Army Wives", if not a soap opera? Even the crap "reality" genre is built incorporating melodramatic elements. Hence "Star Search" morphed into "American Idol".

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can show you endless reports about how successful The Jay Leno Show is and we know whats up with that! :lol: Any network is going to find something positive to report. There is a reason cable networks don't release full ratings. Being Erica is successful, but just about everything else has flopped. Holidate? Bank on Mom and Dad? Who would even greenlight such garbage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That doesn't tell me she knows the ratings for Soapnet. And am I not to believe Soapnet has not gained viewers as as been sited in many reports. Many of us who love soaps like to tought Soapnet as some huge failure because they have diversified their programming claiming it hasn;t worked. The numbers on Soapnet were terrible when Soaps was all they were airing. Their objective to become the female "ESPN" by becoming a soap channel never materialized with soaps so they diversify and put on programming to appeal to the young audience they seem to covet. But I also think a few of these shows could survive on Soapnet but with soapnet having to carry the budget of producing these shows daily, would they is the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not saying SOAPnet's ratings are bad, but their new programming is bad. And I don't agree that the numbers were bad when only soaps were airing. It seems that SOAPnet has always been on an upswing. You must keep in mind how available it was when only soaps were airing. They've always been building which is why the network is so widely available now. Just like how soaps paid for primetime programming back in the day. Soaps made SOAPnet what it is and once they got the soap fans to beg cable companies to add it, they dumped the soaps.

When it comes to touting ratings success for SOAPnet they still focus on their daytime in primetime lineup. If not that it's been the success of their daytime lineup with the primetime soaps. I don't see anything saying Holidate or Bank on Mom and Dad is a hit. Southern Belles and Being Erica are the only successful new shows and they can't be the only reason SOAPnet is doing well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

TV media outlets have reported that SoapNet is finally in the black since it changed its programming to prime time repeats, movies and reality. I would not be surprised if SoapNet eventually wants to replace the daily soap repeats.

Really. She rarely has anything of value to add to any conversation on the soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don;t know who's stating Jay Leno is successful. I certainly have not read that anywhere. But if there is a claim that it is, maybe it's doing exactly what NBC expected, given that NBC is less committed to original programming than the other 3 networks are. Maybe they are headed to being the first network station with simply reality, news, talk, sports programming, and reality shows. And garbage? One person's garbage is another person's treasure. I see nothing on the CW that appeals to me AT ALL yet they continue to taught the garbage they show. I don't think Soapnet is the end all be all. But obviously they've experimented with original programmming and have purchased these shows from canadian TV. Based on the direction they've chosen at this point it's not hard to see which they feel is the most cost effective no matter how crappy it is. And of course they could continue to build their audience and have more money for more oiginal pogramming in the future who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

NBC touts Jay Leno as a success in it's press releases, just like SOAPnet touts it's own successes in press releases that it releases. That's where all the news that SOAPnet is doing well comes from...SOAPnet. That's my point, they can pick and choose what they want us to know. And still the only things they've touted as successful are Southern Belles, Being Erica and their daytime soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now that I agree with but if viewers for Soaps are on the decline overall and viewers for shows like 90210 or One Tree Hill are on the upswing overall, quality or not what will they air. To me the question becomes can Soapnet absorb the budget required to produce these shows should the networks drop them. Maybe yes they can or will be able to at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And as I said, NBC may consider Jay Leno a success. we don't know what their expectations were to begin with. Maybe cost wise a show that gets 6 million viewers a night with limited cost is more profitable than a PT drama getting 9 million viewers a night with a huge budget. But as far as Soaps on Soapnet, there's a big difference between rebroadcasting a show and producing it for the station. I think Lifetime is a pretty successful cable station and honestly how much original programming do they have. And you're wrong about the Soapnet press releases. I've seen their releases praising shows like AMC and OLTL and how their numbers have risen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's the reaction to any show someone has a strong investment in. And the Internet is the place many go to vent. It's going to happen more with the fans who have stuck with a soap because they may have been with it for 20 or 30 years. They're just letting off steam. As long as they don't make any type of serious threats or go handcuff themselves to the Early Show set or whatever, I can understand it. It doesn't help that when a soap is canceled, the reaction from the press, the network, and even a lot of soap fans is usually just a sneer and a "Get over it."

I would love to see a network run some foreign soaps, but they tried in the 90s and gave up. Trio, or one of those, ran Corrie, briefly. FX fan Home & Away briefly. BBC America ran Eastenders, current and classic, which I loved. A few years ago they tried again with Hollyoaks, although they only ran that for like two or three months or less before dumping it in a bad timeslot and finally airing the episodes they wanted to burn through on BBC America. I think these networks decided it wasn't worth the time or effort to build an audience, so they dumped the stuff. BBC America probably gets more ratings from those who want to watch Cash in the Attic for the 501th time.

As for Soapnet, my problem with most of their non-soap lineup is it's sh!t. And even their hugely hyped Southern Belles seemed to crash in the ratings after a week or two.

If that stuff is profitable, then they're the ones who have to make money, so they have to do what they have to do. But please, change the name of the network already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jodie stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
    • Kinda agree. I have some issues with the sets. Nicole's living room is bland-looks like a display home. Bill and Hayley's is too small and basically hideous. And neither of them have a front door/entrance or staircase. People just appear from the corridor. Those green accents  at Uptown are way too much. Also,Naomi and Vanessa not having an office or a home .
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That Grainger story always reads like hog-wild melodrama, not very similar to the more subtle stories for Rita in her last few years. I wonder how Lenore played the material.
    • More from 1976 Lynn, apparently making every effort to overcome her alcoholism, accepts a baby-sitting job. However, when the baby starts crying, Lynn begins to get nervous and takes one drink, then another. By the time Bruce and Van arrive home, Lynn is on the floor, ineffectually trying to find the doctor’s number, sure the baby is ill. When the mother arrives; she vows to let everyone know what goes on in the mayor’s house.Bruce insists that Lynn has to go, but Van, learning that Lynn can’t remember drinking the cooking sherry, calls Joe to report Lynn’s blackouts. Joe wants her institutionalized but gives in to Van’ s pleas that Lynn needs loving attention. Eddie has sent some of Felicia’s work to a New |York gallery owner and reports to Charles that Lisa Cooper wants to exhibit Felicia’s work. Charles refuses to tell her this and later admits he feels he has “cowed”her attention because of his being confined to a wheelchair. What Charles doesn’t say is: that he’s plagued with fears she’ll leave him for another man. Felicia is exuberant as she starts painting again. She tells Charles how she feels about it, but, jealous of anyone or anything that takes attention from him, Charles tries to undermine her confidence. Eddie finally professes his love for her. He will be happy to step forward if she will only let Be and admit that they belong together. Charles tries to stop Felicia’s ‘trip to New York by making her doubt her own work, and when that fails, he finds business reasons at his bookshop to keep Di, his ex-wife, who is running it for him, from accompanying her. Felicia finally decides it’s not going to work and tells Eddie they might as well call it off. Instead, he arranges for Lisa Cooper to come to Rosehill. Charles is rude and insulting to Lisa when she arrives at the house to view Felicia’s work, and his derogatory remarks about shady gallery dealings prompt Lisa to tell Eddie that living in such an atmosphere could permanently stunt an artist’s development; if Felicia is subjected to this indefinitely, it’s not even worth Lisa’s while to take her on as a client. Felicia finally decides she can’t be torn apart any longer and must accede to Charles’s demands. She tells Eddie her career is over and she won’t paint any more, breaks down in his arms, crying bitterly, then pulls away, unwilling to acknowledge that her feelings for him are deeper than she dare face. Charles is delighted when she prepares to dispose of her art supplies, insisting everything will be fine once she has accepted that this part of her life is over. But she cannot do it. She promises him that he can set the limits and terms, but she must paint. Arlene discovers that her mother is planning to avoid the surgery she needs, and the accompanying medical bills, by leaving Rosehill and moving in with her sister Dorothy out west. Arlene manages to prevent this by calling her aunt and telling her the truth about Carrie’s condition. Dr. Tom Crawford has been footing the costs of Carrie’s presurgery tests, but Arlene knows that Carrie won’t like this. So she tells Carrie that David Hart, the son of Meg’s late husband, the former mayor, has heard about their plight and forwarded the money as a gesture of friendship, to be repaid when possible. To convince Carrie that she does indeed have the money, Arlene asks Ray to just lend it to her for a few hours, so she can convince Carrie and then immediately return it. Ray instructs her to get dressed for a night on the town and takes her, out implying that the money will be waiting at the end of the evening. When Ian Russell happens to join them, Arlene doesn’t suspect anything is afoot, but when e Ray suddenly leaves, she becomes furious, realizing what he’s done. But she finds Mr: Russell a distinguished and cultured man, and decides there’s no harm in having a drink. After cocktails and stimulating conversation, Ian suggests that they go to his place, and Arlene agrees. But when they get there, Ian matter of factly suggests that they skip the preliminaries and get on with it. Ian is embarrassed and annoyed to discover that Arlene is not a professional call girl and that Ray didn’t explain to her the purpose of their |meeting. He is apologetic and solicitous, until Arlene, explaining why Ray felt he could pull this on her, mentions her sick mother in need of an operation. Ian starts to laugh at this overworked standard line, and a livid Arlene storms out of his apartment. Thinking it over, Ian decides he’s more intrigued with Arlene than he is annoyed at Ray, and calls Ray for her telephone number. But Arlene is not delighted to hear from him, and he has to use a good deal of soothing charm before she agrees to have dinner with him at one of the better local restaurants.During dinner Ian again apologizes for his mistake, and he gives Arlene a diamond pendant as a token of his gratitude for her forgiving him. Ray arrives to interrupt an otherwise enjoyable evening with a business matter, and quietly reminds Arlene that Ian is his customer and she’s not to cut herself in with him. At home, Arlene examines the pendant and is convinced that it’s genuine. She hides it in her dresser drawer, unable to bring herself to show it to her mother.
    • LOL!! That's funny.  I actually thought he got a little better.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Oh God, she's back? I thought those first scenes were well-intentioned but hysterical.
    • More Guiding Light 1976 At dinner the next evening, Grainger tells Rita he still can’t understand why she inherited from his father and he’s hired a lawyer to help him discover what her role was in his father’s death. Telling her he knows she lied to him, he again warns that he will destroy her reputation in this town. As Rita insists she’s done nothing wrong, Grainger, growing even more angry, lashes out, “Ill see you charged with m—”. Suddenly he clutches his head and collapses to the floor. As people rush to help him, Rita quickly slips out of the restaurant. Grainger is rushed to Cedars and treated for stroke. Rita is even more frightened and upset when it appears that he’s going to recover under the excellent treatment and care of Ed, who is assigned as his attending physician, and Peggy, who is a fine specialty nurse. Rita, drawn by an unseen force to his door, is further shaken when Peggy, seeing her, presses her into temporarily spelling her so she can take a short break. Ed is determined to come to Rita’s aid, as she did his, and brings a big steak for dinner to her apartment. But Rita is too unnerved and shaky to even be with Ed, and disappoints him by asking him to leave before dinner, explaining that she’s extremely tired. Ed knows it’s more than that, and is doubly determined to help her out of this depression, but when she starts to cry, he leaves her, as she wishes. Roger, remembering how Grainger fired him from the oil fields for- being a friend of Rita’s, is disappointed to learn that Grainger has come out of his coma and that Ed feels Grainger’s paralysis and inability to talk may just be temporary. Rita is pressed to assist Tim with a spinal tap on Grainger, and is frightened when her presence causes Malcolm’s pulse rate to rise rapidly. His doctors are unable to understand his rapid pulse changes. Rita tells Roger why Grainger is so hateful toward her. While she was his father’s special nurse, Malcolm made physical advances toward her and she fought him off. His father noticed her bruises~and instantly guessed his son had manhandled her. The old man then swore to her he’d never forgive Malcolm for this cruelty. Roger again warns Rita that nobody is to know about his connection with her and with the Graingers. He fears that if Peggy learns about it, she will leave him.  Ed continues to press his concern and support on Rita, and while it helps to a certain degree and she’s grateful, Rita can’t bring herself to tell him what the source of her worry is. Each day, as Grainger rallies a bit more, her fear and tension increase. Finally, Grainger is able to barely murmur, “Lie... father ... Rita,” to Peggy and manages to crudely letter “RITA S” on a pad of paper. Peggy, assuming that Rita has somehow managed to get Grainger to respond, summons her to the hospital in the hope that she can further stimulate him and thus hasten his recovery. But a major catastrophe, a train derailment, - has immobilized the entire area, and Cedars, as well as all local hospitals, is being overrun with patients. Even though she’s off duty, having served her full shift, Rita is pressed into distributing the patients’ medication. Peggy, explaining that Grainger has already had an accidental delay of medication, which could have caused a major setback, must receive his dosage exactly on schedule. The sight of Rita again agitates Grainger, but she finishes her extra duty and returns home, drained and oversensitive as well as exhausted. When the regular nurse does her usual check, she finds Grainger lying over the side of his bed, unconscious. She issues a “Code Blue” call for the emergency team, and Steve, there almost immediately, starts resuscitation and then gives adrenalin, right into the heart, but Grainger is dead. As soon as he hears, Ed rushes to Cedars in amazement. This is all impossible to him, as he saw Grainger’s recovery as a certainty. He immediately institutes an investigation to determine the cause of death. Roger, told by Peggy what has happened, notifies a stunned Rita just before Ed arrives to question her about everything she can remember about the last time she was in Grainger’s room. Rita, unable to understand what’s happening around her, breaks down in tears, crying that she could be responsible for his death. Ed comforts her, assuring her that he’s not blaming her, just trying to find out what happened.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy