Members DRW50 Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 Aside from Price is Right, the genre did die completely on network daytime. They tried and tried to replace it with other programming. It's back now because it's cheap. If they find something else even cheaper, then LMAD will be history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sylph Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 The way they are, they were (doomed). Scientifically proven. But your post touches on philosophy and the unanswered question: What is eternal? Soap operas most certainly are not. They will live, but transformed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 The endtimes are upon us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 And when soaps can cut costs appropriately and find a modern audience, both casual and regular, they'll be back, or, if they're lucky, they'll simply continue. But the kind of stories that are told, and the focus on an immersive world for the viewer, does not have to change. There is nothing about the kind of tales Nixon or Marland or Phillips or Lemay told that is obsolete (as opposed to the execution). Issues of ongoing family and community will always be part of scripted drama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 I will never get why people look at game shows with such contempt and such a upturned nose perspective. Uh...soaps are the ones dying a miserable death (regardless of reason) and if they ever come back, it won't be the way they are now. Game shows are thriving and are a living breathing genre that is constantly changing and rearranging. Look at "Family Feud." It was a huge hit in the 70s and early 80s with Richard Dawson. It lost popularity for a while and was canned. Then, only three years later, it was a big hit again with Ray Combs. After a while, it lost popularity again and was canceled. Then, only four years later, it became a big hit AGAIN and is currently on its fifth host and still going strong. It's like game shows have found the fountain of youth or something. Honestly, though, it never really mattered if TPIR was the only game show on network daytime. So many of the syndicated games were seen in daytime, and it's hard to tell the difference just from watching between the two. Family Feud is a hit in daytime syndication, Millionaire is (or was) a hit in daytime syndication, Jeopardy reruns are a hit in daytime syndication (and even weekend daytime, which is truly WTF), Deal or No Deal is doing well, Fifth Grader (ugh) is even doing well, etc. Hollywood Squares was a hit for a while, too, another show that rose from the ashes twice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sylph Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 LOL! Marceline... You don't have anything to add? To spice things up a bit? You know you want to! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 I was hoping we could find a way to circle back to the topic of ATWT's cancellation as opposed to Sylph's endless pubertal rebellion on the board. There's nothing more over the hill than a man begging other posters on the Internet to help him "spice it up!" Bedroom aids come to mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sylph Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 Because they trivialise knowledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 Oh, that's adorable, you're British now. Just like Madonna! Right on the bleeding edge of now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 Family Feud was a powerhouse show and is now, compared to those days, a back number, although at least they finally wised up and replaced Louis Anderson. I love game shows. I watched Joker's Wild, Classic Concentration, Win Lose or Draw, Sale of the Century, on and on. I watched the reruns that used to come on USA. I watch GSN now, to see the classic shows from 40, 50 years ago. I sat through every episode of awful Regis and the brain dead people who generally made up Million Dollar Password, because I wanted to at least get to see the show revived one more time (and it was nice to see Betty White). My fondness for game shows doesn't mean I can enjoy something as badly put together as LMAD, or that I can trumpet their ratings, which are barely higher than GL's and which somehow managed to have older demos. Do I resent game shows for replacing soaps? No. Do I resent that these game shows are, if LMAD, or the current Price is Right are any indication, cheap jack, boring afterthoughts which seem to only be on the air to fill time? Yes. And if these shows do succeed, then in the long run, they just further sour the great energy which game shows once had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 I thought Deal or No Deal and Fifth Grader had both gone down quite a bit in the ratings. Aside from the few stalwarts, it seems to me that game shows are still just brief fads which are quickly burnt out if they're put in primetime. I do enjoy some of the GSN shows, like the one Alfonso Ribero hosts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 Well, we're on the same page here, then lol I liked the new LMAD for the first two weeks or so, but it got old QUICK. Once I realized that the contestants don't make their own costumes, the magic was lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 I agree. It's naive, or a copout, since we will never know, but I really do believe that if the above writers just started out in the soap genre now, they would find a way to hook viewers. I can't bring myself to believe that people were willing to watch soaps 20 years ago but then suddenly technology fell on their head and now they see daytime as unworthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sylph Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 That's lovely, but I don't believe it. Don't forget the viewership kept bleeding even when Bill Bell, Harding Lemay and Douglas Marland wrote shows. They couldn't even stabilise them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted December 10, 2009 Members Share Posted December 10, 2009 This is exactly where we differ, because it's not hard for me to believe this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.fbb6aa067610794e36433d57928a2f42.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.