Jump to content

All: Claire Labine Interview


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 162
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah, the GH gossip promises to be interesting.

I find Claire's admission that she writes for herself to be very honest. I have always thought that most headwriters do. Fan campaigns are a waste of time and irrelevant because stories are planned out weeks ahead and follow the headwriter's vision. Guza definitely writes for himself. You can tell which characters he loves and finds interesting or when he gets bored and drops a story.

Robin is my favorite GH character so I was crushed when the Labines made her HIV+. I still resent it. I think that the disease has given Guza an excuse to limit her romantic stories though because Robin is not in the mob, it probably doesn't matter. It is unfortunate that Guza and Phelps are uninterested in exploring Robin's HIV. It was barely mentioned when she was pregnant. They may be right that it is too serious a topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have mixed feelings with the longevity of Robin given her HIV. I think that if she didn't have it, then Guza may have been more tempted to kill her off via bullets or click boom, to send some type of message about women who move on from the mob heroes.

I'm sorry I didn't respond to this more. I will say I am VERY glad she said she'd write the gorilla story again. Of all the reasons to criticize RH in that time...you had the Oompa Loompa Kimberly shoved on people 24/7, you had the mob literally invading the show, you had the Ryans being dismantled...and the biggest problem was a quick King Kong knockoff? If anything that was better than most other Delia stories during Randall's time in the role.

I think the "too depressing" criticism was something which was more for GH viewers. For GH, given its history, that era was depressing. Viewers weren't used to such pain back-to-back. Looking back, I'm sure a lot of them would choose that era over the snuff porn/mob porn era ever since, but thy did't know that at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good point. I had never considered this possibility.

Like I said before, I never considered the Labine era as depressing. It was organic and full of well told stories with some comedy and lightweight stories thrown in. I would rush home to watch GH. I had not done that since the Robert/Anna/Duke era and have not done that since.

I only saw the depressing tag this in the soap mags. I remember an article about the state of the soaps which had dropping ratings where a producer said that the Stone's death was too depressing and that was why the viewers tuned out. The producer might have been JFP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never considered her GH to be "too depressing" either. she might have done a few heavy-hitting socially conscious stories, but there was a lot of romance, comedy, and family interaction that balanced everything out.

And I'm glad she wrote the show she wanted to write. Too many HW's and EP's try to appease fanbases these days they they don't know how to craft a cohesive show.

I wish Labine (and Wendy Riche for that matter) would make a final return to daytime and get a strong producer to back her up and defend her vision to the network for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think a lot of the era had good balance, but I think when it came to the time of Monica's breast cancer story and Paige dying and Alan almost having sex with Bobbie + Stone dying of HIV as Robin waits to see if she has the disease + Sonny and Brenda and Luke and Laura breaking up. This was all going on around the same time, with some of the lighthearted character like Sean and Tiffany written out, or like Felicia, sidelined. A lot of this was very heavy emotional material, and a lot of it wasn't rooted in the escapism of the Monty era. I remember Marlena de la Croix writing a column about the men who loved GH in the Monty era and how many stopped watching during this era.

They were even going to have Audrey get Alzheimer's at this time, which they dropped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One of my favorite Labine stories was Annabelle and Foster's romance. Lucy's hijinks were also hysterical. These stories also represent the Labines era to me. I can see why men tuned out with the adventure stories gone, but the audience was declining for all the soaps. Again we have more and more women going into the work place. The daytime audience was dwindling no matter what was on the screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All of daytime was definitely on the decline. I think GH got more notice at the time because they had some big drops in 1994-1995, moreso than a number of other soaps. I think one was during that Puerto Rico remote, so I guess it was more than just depression taking viewers away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also found Labine's GH too dark and depressing, and could never get into it. I was schooled on Monty's GH, with its energy, quick pace, and electricity. That was GH to me. Yes, there was more of a depth to her writing than in previous eras, but it was all so gloomy and dour. I found it unwatchable. Don't get me wrong...I think she's one of the better writers that daytime has seen, but in hindsight I wonder how much of the brilliance of RH in those first few years can be attributed to Paul Avila Mayer instead. I was never impressed with much of Labine's post-RH work, or even her solo stint at RH near the end of its run. You never hear much about Mayer. When people speak of the brilliance of early RH, Labine is the one inevitably credited. Anyone know anything about him other than the fact that he was married to Sasha von Sherler(sp?), who played Brooke's mom Jane on AMC in the mid 80s, and that he had a not-too-successful run as SFT HW? I would love to get some insight into his working dynamic with Labine. Oh and by the way, and I'm the last one to defend him, but I think that Guza, with all his many flaws, has done the right thing concerning Robin. By keeping mention of her HIV status to a minimum, it sends a subliminal message to the viewers that people with HIV should not be defined by their HIV status. She is a character who just happens to be positive. I think it's right that it's not used as some cheap plot device.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab this episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). I thought we had the full HD version of ep.3170 on the YouTube channel, but it appears they added the wrong episode but labelled it 3170. 
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's a name I haven't heard in a minute. Thanks! 
    • Well, since I'm still up unexpected past my growing-into-it bedtime. lol.   I finally got to rewatch Monday's. I even rewatched Friday's to take it all in. Now that we got the reveal and hit the climax of the SilkPress Sheila storyline, now we get to watch the aftermath and/or turns that come with its climax. So far, so good. Friday left us with three cliffhangers. And what I found surprising was how I felt about them over a rewatch.    I know some of you all felt a way about the dialogue during Kat vs Eva. I remember liking it more the first time around and it was nice for them to have these scenes to establish more of a frenemy vibe for them going forward. That still held up. But I found myself agreeing with you all about that dialogue. lol. Still, it was nice to have both of their POVs.   Second up was Silk Press Sheila vs the Duprees. And I was happy to get a brief spat with Dani in there. But the rest standouts for me was Anita and Martin. Haters can hate and given the tail end of the episode, I will agree to a fault, but Brandon has impressed and he was on fire on Monday and had great subtle work on Friday. And that subtle work made it all the better. Like I believe I said when I was watching...BC has a much better grip on his character and seems to be realizing what his tics are so has started to be able to know when to turn it up and when to dial it down. And for the most part (emphasis on most), he got that. Meanwhile, TT was giving fierceness, and I was here for every minute of it. Her reading SilkPress. Her being quip about it. Her 'BE STILL.' Ooooo she had a chokehold on me as Anita gave what I was expecting her to SilkPress. WORTH THE WAIT. I also loved Vernon's CHOOSE SILENCE. I wonder though if SilkPress will figure out Martin's condition from her observing Anita and Vernon with him.   And speaking of worth it...Oooo YES Nicole vs Ted was worth totally worth it. Oooooo I knew DD would nail it, and it was all so well done. The fight between the part of Nicole who is a therapist vs Nicole as a woman who wants to express how she feels. And being so angry. And how there would be moments when it would shoot out of her. And how she would restrain herself. But how she felt she should not be restrain. Just the levels of processing and layers. And DD played it all so well. I do wish Maurice gave just a little bit more, but overall, I thought he did a good job even if it was just Ted coming across as a deadbeat and not at all redeemable. And Kat being there for her mother was so beautiful.   Minority, but I love the montage though yes, it did run a little long. Given how the Duprees like to bond (and also as I mentioned from my own very recent family experiences), it did not seem out of place to me.     That said...let's see how the aftermath worked in today's episode. Overall. Cuz RC can be hit or miss. 
    • I wonder whose brilliant (

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) idea it was to do an almost complete rip-off of the "who killed Tom King"-storyline. That's some quality style writing right there.....  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy