Jump to content

Y&R- SPOILER possible New family!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

I got this of from Toni's who has links to whats going on with Y&R.

Apparently its more of a "what if" plan than a confirmed fact. Because things have not worked out with Eric Braeden the writers including MAB are looking at the Hellstrum family as the "new family" of Y&R with the introduction of the Abbott's as a centerpiece of Y&R in the early 80's, they are looking to repeat history and add the Hellstrum family as the centerpiece.

Casting calls are soon to go out for brother & sister for JT as well as new parents for JT. It will be explained that JT is the youngest of the family. Unclear what "business" JT's dad will be in, but he'll be a "tycoon" to replace TGVN

Due to not having to pay EB's salary, it will free up funds to hire this new "Hellstrum" family. Some current legacy characters on Y&R may be on the chopping block, as well as newbie characters that just don't seem to working out in order to make room for the addition of at least 4 new characters.

Also long-term spoiler is that JT's father will go head-to-head with Jack (PB) and Jack will have designs on JT's mother (to add spice to the S/L)

Other "Way down the Road" ideas on the writer's drawing board include an Uncle or Aunt for JT if the ratings prove positive with introduction of his family.

Wow! although Im kind of glad that its JT's family who will be another main family because that means his childhood sweetheart Colleen can come back one day!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

MORE longtime characters will be dumped. What a shock.

I do like JT, and I don't believe that he is in any way a liability to the show, I think he is an asset when they know what to do with him. So I hope they do bring some of his family in, as long as they know what to do with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Who cares about JT and his family?

Why not bring back Prentiss Brooks, the son of Leslie and Lance, or Chuckie Foster and Jennifer Foster, the children of Snapper Foster? They could use those three legacy characters to come back to GC and interact with the Abbotts, Newmans and Chancellors. They of course would already be in their 30s as IIRC they were all born prior to 1980.

Why not put TLW on contract and bring back Nate and revive the Winter's family? There is so much in the history of Y&R that these brain dead writers can reach into and grab and work with instead of introducing a new family that no one will care about.

The positive thing about bringing back members of the Foster and Brooks family is that they can introduce "their children" who would not be SOARS'd because three of their descendants were born before 1980 (Chuckie, Jennifer, Prentiss). They could also introduce other descendants who could have been born off screen.

Colleen is never, ever coming back. She was declared brain dead and her organs were ripped out of her body and her heart was donated to Victor Newman. Unless they want to do a revival of Wicked and the Wizard of Oz, she ain't ever coming back as anything other than a scarecrow on the grounds of the Newman Ranch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

CSF, this group isn't going to give a black family a storyline.

I don't trust them with new characters either. They don't know how to bring them in. I'd like to see some Brooks or some Fosters but unless they tie them to characters like Jill, or bring Lorie or Leslie back, it will just be new faces with an old name.

I care about JT, and although I don't really expect them to know what to do with him, I think he can help bring a family in if they know how to do it (which is a faint hope, I will admit).

It's like Paul 30 years ago. They used Paul who had been on the fringes for several years, to bring the Williams in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know what you're saying Carl, but the thing is, IMO, if they bring in a new family. What will become of Nikki and Jill? Heather is already on recurring and there is not much for Paul to do so there are 4 characters that are of high risk to be written off the canvas. And then what will become of Katherine? Will Amber become her little side kick running around town screaming "Mrs. C! Mrs. C!"?

Colleen is dead so what will transpire in JT's love life? Fans already don't like AH as Victoria.

My problem with them introducing a new family is that they continue to neglect so many characters as it is. Will JT become the new Michael and his family become the new Glo, Kevin, Eden, Ryder and Jeffery?

IMO, introducing a new family on Y&R in it's current state is like putting a bandaid over a stab wound. There is still so much that needs to be done on this canvas with it's existing families. Why would we begin to care about JT's family. Fans may like JT, but when they look at what Y&R has become, would they really think this family is what Y&R is all about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess the way I see it is, Jill and Nikki are probably leaving anyway, no matter what. They have worn Jill down to nothing. Nikki now exists only for Victor. * The show doesn't care about them. I would guess that Paul and Heather will also disappear.

That may happen whether they bring new characters in or not.

If the choice is between continuing to drag along characters who are creatively dead (the Newmans) and bringing in a new family, then I would go with the new family.

I can't really compare them to Michael's family because that isn't a family. They are people who were each slowly brought in, then the show made them related to each other as some feint to make viewers care. The only time they are a family is when they are scheming, and even that seems to have passed now.

The Winters are basically done, and the Abbotts are a family in name only, so there's a huge hole in the show.

Y&R certainly can't depend on JT as some sort of future lead, but I think if they are smart enough to introduce interesting family that viewers can care about, then they will have a step forward. Split him from Victoria, give him his own identity, and tie that into his family.

*If they DO want to keep Nikki, then I think they could reunite her with Paul, reinforce the Paul/JT friendship, reinforce that JT is the father of Nikki's grandson, and working relationship, and then through this group, bring in JT's family. Tie Nikki to this family in some way. Say she has a past with JT's father.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Personally, I just hope that something drastic takes place behind the scenes and MAB and her team are all blacklisted for this show. I still believe that with a competent writer, things could be some what corrected with Jill and Nikki and Paul. I think a competent writer could dismiss all the useless newbies. And that's my problem with the current team and their track record. I think whatever they bring it would be disastrous in some form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd love to see Paul, Nikki, and Jill stay. They got me hooked on Y&R all those years ago and I still care deeply about them all. I just don't have any hope it will happen, at least with this group around. Even some of the soap press acted like Y&R was doing Jess and Melody a favor by bothering to want them around in any capacity. This whole "Poor MAB, budget cuts from Sony tie her hands" argument will carry a lot of weight.

Hopefully MAB and the others like Rauch and Hogan will be gone from the show and someone who knows what they're doing will use the vets properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's the thing. Every crazy, impossible spoiler these days has been coming true.

Laugh me out of Dodge, but Genie and Jonathan as the Hellstroms could actually be entertaining. But I'd rather see Denise Alexander -- fierce again -- as grandma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I've always said, Robert Newman does not get enough credit for the popularity of Josh/Reva. Had he stayed in '91, and had years to build other relationships before Kim returned, I'm not sure we'd have been stuck with "always".
    • Bizarrely, while I didn't see it, I distinctly remember my younger sister telling me. We were walking to the store, and at the top of the hill she let out "Roger raped Holly", and I swear I remember it echoing for what seemed like forever. She would've been five at the time.  I know,,,which I find extraordinary. I have toyed with the idea of watching Another World for Maeve, Kathleen Widdoes and Beverlee. But watching Vanessa call Emma Snyder "momma" kinda weirded me out. LOL. I believe that's what I read in the recaps from the time as well. I meant, I couldn't quite believe that the audience wouldn't understand that a woman preparing to go to her engagement party  was raped. I know that on ATWT John raped Kim while they were married, resulting in Andy, but I think they shied away from calling that marital rape.
    • I have my fingers crossed for a baby to be named Monica Michelle & called Monica. And, yes, I do realize that is not equal to having her onscreen but, like you said & of course a recast is unthinkable. 
    • I would love to have Monica on screen. Leslie Charleson has died. She played the role for 46 years. Monica should pass as well. No one is going to accept a long-term recast for Monica, no matter how great  the actress they could get.
    • Coming into June...   It just occurred to me that seeing Carter/Hope engaged that there was something missing. Oh, yeah! DAPHNE. I missed a few episodes, but she left, right? So is Ridge going to be the spoiler for Carter/Hope now? I felt that Daphne/Carter/Hope had more legs to it. But I guess we will see.   I did enjoy that show circling back around to Luna/Will/Electra. Katie was spitting nothing, but truth. Same for Sheila. And it's good to see Luna vs Electra, and they gave off more adversary chemistry this time around versus when they were at Deacon's.    I was happy to see Liam reduced to C plot.
    • To bring over from the May Sweeps Thread from @Chris B   I know the fashions have gotten mixed reviews but I actually like what the new costume designer is putting the cast in. It feels more modern and the more tacky pieces I feel make sense for rich people. They're buying for the brand and the price and we often see celebs in things like this. Especially for a character like Nikki, I feel the more over the top (and tacky), the more realistic it is.   I agree. While it has been hit and miss no question, I have found it fascinating to watch what the costume designer is attempting to do with the various characters and their clothes. Some have been overdue. Some have been fascinating. But (outside of Billy) not boring to watch. I definitely find it more modern as well.   My growing issue has been it's not good that the best reason to watch Y&R as of late has been to see what people are wearing rather than the writing. It feels like a red flag.
    • Haha. The fact that I stopped regularly viewing at the same time and know what you are talking about is chef's kiss.    I'm slowly bingewatching Nurse's Ball Week. But it's slow for me because a lot of the same tics and writing flaws for me that made me throw up my hands is still evident *cough*CVE*cough* Thankfully, there are some things I like also and from a glance in the GH May Thread, it seem like it had a good Sweeps with good fallout. And do I even need to mention Nina finally slapping the taste out of Carly's mouth? See? Regardless of her flaws, I do enjoy Korte-headed episodes over CVE-headed episodes because they always seem to have more emotional resonance to long-time fans.
    • And that charity does still get mentioned from time to time. I want to say the last time was some time this year, too. 
    • Oh, no. Vernon has definitely had his moments.   Choose silence anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy