Jump to content

GL: Logan Rant


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Logan Rant in TV Guide:

He talks mostly about how bad the new production model was, the sound being inaudible at times, the zooming in on things like belt buckles, walls and whatnot. Characters talking about nothing alot of the time.

He says they misjudged the loyalty of their audience and their tolerance level for this kind of stuff, either that or they think their audience are idiots. The show should have been trying to lure in viewers with take your breath away, stir your soul storytelling, instead of a new production model.

He says all of this led to a loss of a once great, beloved show, and that it will take a long time to get over that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

ICAM with everything he said.

I am still PISSED that P&G, TeleNext, CBS and mostly EW and JLH/DK did to my fuckin.g show!!!

I'm mad at this ill-thoughtout, horribly executed "production model" that EW did last year. And that P&G let her get away with it. This was my show they treated like a lab experiment.

I'm pissed that GL's "magic number" that caused it's cancelation is now the average rating for other shows, and they're still around. Particularly ATWT, that hit 1.6/1.7 regularly yet they can add expensive vets to their cast. When GL was above 2.0, TPTB had their cast slashed in half!

I'm very, very pissed that the writing suffered for YEARS and EW did nothing about it. ICAM with Logan that if EW would have hired a good writer, we all may not be seeing the end of an institution. She just sat there and watched as they turned Harley into a COMIC BOOK character (among many other horrible stories).

And now they've DK a place on ATWT's writing staff? UGH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know why EW and P&G haven't publicized this more to defend themselves, but the new GL production model came at a very rough time. The team of writers wrote exactly ONE script before the WGA went on strike. So for the first three months of trying to learn the new production model, the producers were also getting scripts written by people who were either written by amateurs or people not associated with the show.

Yes, the production model had major issues at the beginning. BUT IT IMPROVED. And when the strike ended, the writing improved. Why is Logan complaining about an old issue? I guess it's the same reason that Carolyn Hinsey chooses to bash GL by complaining about the Cassie/Josh story (which has been over for a year) and Grady (who has been off the show for over 6 months.) Could it be that Logan and Hinsey are hacks? That's my guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The "new" production model was horrendous at the beginning and yes, I suppose you could say it "improved" to horrible at the end. There were constant problems with sound. EW had all these four-wall sets built and most of them were unusable. Those are facts. EW's consistent reliance on that fucked up so-called "contemporary" music playing in the background sucked what little emotional resonance the scenes had right out of them.

And look how they handled the last week of storytelling. EW and JLH are hacks. Neither one of them should be allowed to come anywhere near a soap opera again IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's another thing I will never understand. She completely abandoned traditional soap opera cues and music for this cheaper, substandard music(with the exception of maybe a few artists).

Could she not have used Siewert? Was he too expensive? They could have picked any random NYU music student to create piano cues for them on the cheap. It would have been something great for him to place on his portfolio.

I will never understand this. Part of what makes a soap opera, well, a soap opera, is the dramatic score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly! And apparently, EW had access to some of the old scores cuz as someone pointed out in the monthly discussion thread, she used Reva and Josh's old music in the finale.

That makes it more puzzling. She had this great music to choose from and still chose that other crap?!?! Mind boggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with Logan. They should have found a way to lure in a new audience by writing out much of the cast and brining in the next generation of Lewis', Coopers', Bauers', Rearden's, and Spaulding's. Anchor the new cast by some vets like Josh, Olivia, Beth, Billy and Alan. Don't try to reinvent the show, but recreate it with fresh faces that a new audience would find appealing and come up with some fresh ideas. Then wait for the audience to grow. EW and DK were total hacks. They did worse to GL then John Conboy and Ellen Weston did to the show in 1 year. JC's mistakes could have been fixed under Wheeler and DK, but they just did whatever they wanted and ruined the show 20 times worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Conboy and Weston did some disastrous stuff, but GL just got really goofy after that. I don't think DK was really cut out for that role as head writer and I don't think EW was a good choice for EP. I think MADD should have brought in a much stronger pair to try to salvage the show the best they could. I don't think DK and EW did the best they could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy