Jump to content

Search For Tomorrow Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

August 21 1981

Don Chastain, who plays Dr. Max Taper in CBSs’ “Search for Tomorrow, has been named head writer for the soap opera. The daytime drama celebrates its 30th anniversary on Sept. 3. Chastain will continue to portray Dr. Taper occasionally in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, great overview of late 82, dc. That was the time I started watching it, after it switched to NBC. It's a shame that Rusty didn't become a long-range "villain." It's also a bit sad to realize that both Travis and Martin would be gone by October '84. The successive changes in producers and head writers just decimated this family. And losing Sherry Mathis in the summer of '85 was the final nail in the coffin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

Thanks for sharing, it's always nice to hear whenever her voice pops up. Steele had actually taken over as announcer in late '81 when the show was still on CBS, but I have no idea how late into 1982 she was announcing to. One source I have lists her as announcer through 1984(except for Don Pardo doing the infamous live ep) until when Hal Simms of EON fame took over, but I don't think that's accurate. 

 

There use to be the 1-15-82 closing credits up on Youtube somewhere where Steele gave her own ATWT-style Friday spiel at the end of the credits, but I don't know if that video is still up somewhere. 

Edited by soapfan770
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Thanks for posting this. I'd be curious to know when the strike material started and to know at what point Chastain took over before the official announcement. My guess is that will remain a mystery. It's interesting to read some of the syndicated columnists from the time. They share their opinion that Chastain injected humor into the series and the boxing storyline involving Brian Emerson seems well received. I have to chuckle that the same columnists also suggested that the reason Chastain was dumped was because his projections for the show were so out there that they had to fire him. Considering how insane the Sunburst story seems, written by his successors, I cannot imagine how crazy Chastain's planned storylines must have been. 

 

In rereading this thread, I saw Paul you posted about John Burnett being announced as the headwriter in late November 1981 with the intention of his work starting mid-December. Pure speculation, but I think John Burnett might have been scrapped because the show was moving to NBC. In early December, the deal between NBC and P&G was announced. I wonder if they wanted to go with a more known writer than Burnett. Ralph Ellis and Eugenie Hunt are said to take over in December 1981 and they are still there in the early December 1982 episodes I watched today. 

 


Jarrod, I'm curious about what you, and others think, about Rusty. I don't know how I feel about him. It's clear that Ralph Ellis and Eugenie Hunt are trying to craft him as a long term threat to Liza and Travis' happiness as well as making him a major antagonist in the lives of many Hendersonites. The problem I have is it just seem to work, which is odd because Warren Carter works beautifully in this sort of role as sh*t stirrer who also seems to have some of his own emotional angst. I would have to say my biggest gripe with Rusty is the lack of attention that the writers pay to the relationship between Rusty and Travis. There are very few scenes with Travis and Rusty connecting or trying to connect. The Rusty and Liza dynamic fascinates me now that we've gotten to a point where Liza has Rusty's number, she knows she can't change Travis' mind about his father, and she just takes some pleasure in knowing that she and Travis will be stronger if she doesn't give Rusty the power to break her.

 

And Rusty continues to try to break her. In the last few episodes I've watched, the latest stage of Rusty's plan is playing out. He has Ringo trail her in his car to convince her that someone is after her. To make the situation more real for Liza, Rusty misplaces documents that Travis needs for a Sunburst experiment at TI requiring Liza to drive the papers to him. The whole situation is engrossing, but then we finally learn Rusty's motivation from a conversation with Aja. Finally, Rusty admits that he wants Liza away from Travis because of a stipulation in the General's will that Rusty will be the guardian for the stocks that have been set aside for Travis' first born. Of course, there's a deadline for the birth of said child that, if it isn't met, the stocks revert to Travis and Martin. So Rusty wants money and power. Simple and compelling motivation except it is predicated on the idea that this was written when the General believed Rusty was dead. Did the General really not remove a codicil for nearly twenty years before he died? That's a stretch especially given how much attention has been given to things like the dynamic between the General / Martin / Rusty. It would make more sense for Rusty to buy the stocks that Martin has with Rusty trying to make the argument that he is family. Maybe that's where this was heading, who knows. 

 

Those are the credits for the first episode on NBC. The closing announcer refers to the March 30th episode of "Flamingo Road." 

 

By the end of the year, a good number of those actors are out.

 

 

Steele is still doing the voiceovers in December 1982. 

 

 

I  agree that thematically, it really works. I really like the computer generated "Search for Tomorrow" sequence, but I admit it probably is too representative of the era. I'm not a big fan of the live action shot of the bird flying over the water, but I love the concept of the show going from day to night by the episode's end.

 

I have no clue why Tom is listed as 'Trip.' He's back to be listed as Tom when he leaves town in October 1982. Tom relocates to Washington, D.C., with hopes of reuniting with Kathy, who he apparently was seeing. Litrofsky appeared in only one episode I have and it's for his goodbye scenes with Stu and Jenny on the Riverboat.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jarrod, I'm curious about what you, and others think, about Rusty. I don't know how I feel about him. It's clear that Ralph Ellis and Eugenie Hunt are trying to craft him as a long term threat to Liza and Travis' happiness as well as making him a major antagonist in the lives of many Hendersonites. The problem I have is it just seem to work, which is odd because Warren Carter works beautifully in this sort of role as sh*t stirrer who also seems to have some of his own emotional angst. I would have to say my biggest gripe with Rusty is the lack of attention that the writers pay to the relationship between Rusty and Travis. There are very few scenes with Travis and Rusty connecting or trying to connect. The Rusty and Liza dynamic fascinates me now that we've gotten to a point where Liza has Rusty's number, she knows she can't change Travis' mind about his father, and she just takes some pleasure in knowing that she and Travis will be stronger if she doesn't give Rusty the power to break her.

 

And Rusty continues to try to break her. In the last few episodes I've watched, the latest stage of Rusty's plan is playing out. He has Ringo trail her in his car to convince her that someone is after her. To make the situation more real for Liza, Rusty misplaces documents that Travis needs for a Sunburst experiment at TI requiring Liza to drive the papers to him. The whole situation is engrossing, but then we finally learn Rusty's motivation from a conversation with Aja. Finally, Rusty admits that he wants Liza away from Travis because of a stipulation in the General's will that Rusty will be the guardian for the stocks that have been set aside for Travis' first born. Of course, there's a deadline for the birth of said child that, if it isn't met, the stocks revert to Travis and Martin. So Rusty wants money and power. Simple and compelling motivation except it is predicated on the idea that this was written when the General believed Rusty was dead. Did the General really not remove a codicil for nearly twenty years before he died? That's a stretch especially given how much attention has been given to things like the dynamic between the General / Martin / Rusty. It would make more sense for Rusty to buy the stocks that Martin has with Rusty trying to make the argument that he is family. Maybe that's where this was heading, who knows. 

 

My interpretation of Rusty, maybe I'm wrong, is that he was designed to be a heavy in a way that Martin couldn't be. Previous writers had made Martin more of a rascal instead of a villain. So Rusty was another member of the family from that same older generation who did more heinous things than Martin (and as a result had a shorter shelf life).

 

Maybe the writers had planned for Rusty to rape Liza, that might have explained all this build up and extensive scenes between them. I agree there needed to be more Rusty-Travis interaction. But if Rusty had done something truly vile or offensive to Liza, then surely Travis would have had a bigger stake in it and would have had more scenes with Rusty during the aftermath/fallout.

 

Warren Carter worked as a character because he was a younger generation example of a guy trying to climb the rungs of society and make a name for himself. Rusty was already established in his many (nefarious) business enterprises. But Warren was basically just starting out, just starting his life of crime. I think Warren's death was premature. He should have survived Suzy's shooting him and gone back to prison. There was more they could have done if he'd gotten out later on a technicality and stirred up more trouble for Suzy, Cagney, Wendy, Jo and the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Forgive me if this has already been posted...

 

FRESH AIR with Terry Gross interviews Mary Stuart

September 21, 1980

Full Episode 

Link to listen: http://39ea54ff11b298f9bcaa-1b99eba380497722926169d6da8b098e.r2.cf5.rackcdn.com/1980/FA19800921.mp3

Link for info on the show: http://www.worldcat.org/title/fresh-air-with-terry-gross-september-21-1980-interview-with-mary-stuart/oclc/969458580

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Looking at the cast in the final ep....people like Joanna Going,Matthew Ashford,David Forsyth etc  just makes me wish they had been cast as legacy characters like Danny, Bruce, Gary etc

Much easier to keep Jo and Stu in the mix and please newer and long time viewers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

It must have felt so special to have them as 'friends' for 35 years, as many fans did. They both feel so real and easy to invest in in a way that some long-running characters don't. I guess that is mostly down to Larry and Mary. 

 

Watching this I couldn't help wondering how bittersweet it must have been for some of the fans of most of the characters who were getting their happy endings. You had Liza meeting with a Travis double, yet Louann Gideon (RIP) was never the Liza who knew Travis. You had Hogan and her Liza wishing each other well, even though they were never the Liza and Hogan who were that popular. You had Hogan and Sunny briefly interacting as their fans now saw Hogan marrying one last recast Patti and Sunny paired off with a man who, as someone said here pages ago, kind of comes off like her gay best friend. 

 

Still, for the cast they had, it is nice enough.


It must have been surreal for NBC soap viewers to see Patrick Tovatt go in about six months from fisherman Zane to a patriarch with a cod Irish accent. Between Linda Dano, Maeve Maguire, Liz Hubbard, Kathleen Widdoes, Marie Masters, etc. Patrick sure had some leading ladies though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

While SFT was never my best-loved-of-all-time soap opera, I had known Jo and Stu for decades, and saying goodbye to them for the final time was heartbreaking, regardless of how much the show had been decimated over the years. It was barely recognizable at the end, with all these newbies and recasts running around, hogging up screen-time, but the core was always Jo and Stu, and as long as they were utilized in any capacity, I would keep going back to Henderson.

 

I wish the great anniversary show were available on youtube, the one in which Jo prepared one of Marge's recipes and she and Stu spoke about their history together, complete with tons of flashbacks. That was a better tribute to the series than the actual finale. The recast, desorased Patti was a terrible mistake. I would have been more satisfied with SFT's last episode if it had just featured Jo and Stu curled up on a couch discussing the triumphs and tragedies of their lives. The debut ep from 1951 exists, and showing clips from that would have brought everything around, full circle.

 

The finales of all the P&G soaps disappointed me so much. *I* could have done so better better by our old friends, and I'll bet many other devoted viewers could have too.

Edited by vetsoapfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
    • Hotel was The Love Boat on land but a little soapier. I will forever maintain that Hotel was a time slot hit. I don't believe that 1983/84 Hotel was a better show than Knots Landing.
    • The Golden Girls key episodes by ratings September 14, 1985: The Engagement (series premiere), rating 25.0, #1 Season highs February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 February 6, 1988: My Brother, My Father; rating 24.6 November 26, 1988: Sophia's Wedding (Part 2), rating 24.3, #1 September 23, 1989: Sick and Tired (Part 1) (season 5 premiere), rating 23.5 January 12, 1991: Sisters of the Bride, rating 19.3 May 9, 1992: One Flew Out of the Cuckoo's Nest (series finale), rating 18.9 Season lows October 19, 1985: The Triangle, rating 18.6 May 16, 1987: Empty Nests (season 2 finale), rating 17.8 February 20, 1988: And Ma Makes Three, rating 18.0 April 29, 1989: Rites of Spring, rating 18.7 April 28, 1990: All Bets are Off, rating 15.8 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 Ten highest-rated episodes October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 January 3, 1987: The Sisters, rating 27.0 November 22, 1986: Family Affair, rating 26.8 January 10, 1987: The Stan Who Came to Dinner, rating 26.6 January 24, 1987: Before and After, rating 26.4 February 28, 1987: Whose Face is This, Anyway?; rating 25.8 September 27, 1986: End of the Curse (season 2 premiere), rating 25.6 November 15, 1986: Big Daddy's Little Lady, rating 25.3 February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 Ten lowest-rated episodes October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 September 28, 1991: The Case of the Libertine Belle, rating 10.9 October 19, 1991: Where's Charlie?, rating 11.0 February 15, 1992: Ebbtide VI: The Wrath of Stan, rating 11.3 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 December 14, 1991: The Pope's Ring, rating 11.7 April 25, 1992: Home Again, Rose (Part 1); rating 12.3 October 5, 1991: Beauty and the Beast, rating 12.7 November 2, 1991: Dateline: Miami, rating 12.7 December 7, 1991: From Here to the Pharmacy, rating 12.8
    • The timing is strange, though. How far in advance would they normally be on location? The Achille Lauro hijacking was on October 7, 1985. Nancy had arrived in Egypt in the storyline by October 18. But the character of Hawk, Chris' Native American friend from Arizona, had already appeared onscreen by September and brought a letter telling Chris to be in Egypt by October 25th.  Why did they already have the link to Arizona before the reason to cancel the shoot in Egypt?  The dust and the jar it came in were from Egypt though. Nancy bought it there and sent it to Mac as a gift before she came back to the states and followed Chris to Arizona.
    • Actually that is not what happened. Nor is the timing right for it to have been. We learned from a WOST interview with Pete Lemay  in 2006, which can be found on YT, that it was Fred Silverman's idea to do the 90 minute show. I don't know how much you know about him but he had these amazing successes as head of daytime at both ABC & at CBS. Then he came to NBC where basically everything he touched turned NOT TO GOLD but to shite. Some of the most expensive shows ever produced up to that time were huge flops. Although even he, like a broken clock, could be right on occasion. However, as we know, he was not right about the 90 minute show. As a matter of fact, afterward,  NBC programmers, who worked FOR him, were asked why they did it & they were quoted as saying it was because they couldn't think of anything else to try. It was a stupid idea from a man who had reached the point where he was throwing anything at the wall to see if it would stick.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy