Is anyone here especially excited about the film?

Acquired tickets for the preview/trailer? IMAX 3-D tickets have been issued or a 16-minute sneak peek at his film Friday.

As usual, it'll either flop or be a total smash hit and change the face of the film industry with its completely new 3D/live action/animation/motion capture technology.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6AAt-oV3wE

Edited October 24, 200916 yr by Sylph

http://www.apple.com/trailers/fox/avatar/teaserlarge.html

I'm looking forward to it, though with a budget that's reportedly over $300 million, I'm sure it will be a financial flop.

I kind of heard the dialogue is dreadful and the whole story shoddy. Don't know how someone got that because, if I have the right information, the film in its entirety hasn't been shown yet.

I'm, however, really not interested in the story, but rather this new shooting technique and the music.

You think it'll flop? Yeah, I can see it. I think Titanic had a budget of something like $200m or so, but times've changed and many aren't turned on by sci-fi stuff. Plus, a billion other reasons might contribute to that probable flop.

Or... It can be a huge hit. Who knows.

'Avatar' running time set at 2.5 hours

How long is it?

That is the question about James Cameron's "Avatar," the science-fiction epic opening Dec. 18 that has been hotly debated for months, with rampant speculation that it would run over three hours.

In fact, it will be well under that, at least in part to meet limits imposed by Imax technology.

The actual running time will be 150 minutes, which is two and a half hours, according to Bruce Snyder, president of domestic distribution for 20th Century Fox, which is handling the release of the movie. He said that may rise to 156 minutes when all of the credits are added on, but that would be the maximum running time.

That will allow for two showings each evening at theaters, most likely at 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. That would also mean about three daytime showings, beginning at 10 a.m., for a total of five shows a day in each auditorium. Typically a theater operator needs half an hour between shows with the lights up to move people out and get the auditorium cleaned, and then another 20 minutes with the lights down for trailers, in-theater advertising and other promotions and announcements.

"Avatar" will start with midnight screenings and play around the clock at first, but that is expected to be the case only for the first few days, after which it will play a normal pattern of runs.

It is unclear exactly how many theaters "Avatar" will open in, but Snyder estimates it will play in 3D in about 2,500 locations on about 3,500 screens. It will also be available in about 1,500 other locations in 2D, where it could play multiple screens in each theater complex. That would indicate an opening on a minimum of 5,500 screens and possibly significantly more, and that's just in the U.S. It will also open in theaters in countries around the world.

There have been stories circulated that "Avatar" would run over three hours, which is understandable because Cameron movies have run long in the past. His last narrative feature was "Titanic" in 1997, which ran 194 minutes, or three hours and 14 minutes.

Cameron has said that one of the constraints on his decision about running time was the Imax runs. "Avatar" will open day-and-date in 3D in about 180 domestic Imax theaters (which is included in the 2,500 locations) and several dozen more internationally. In those theaters that are not yet converted to digital projection, they are limited to two of the giant platters that hold the film, which caps the length of a movie using the system at 170 minutes, which thus became the maximum length that Cameron was willing to let "Avatar" run. In fact, he came in well under that with his final edit.

Imax has not scheduled another movie into its circuit until the first week of March, in anticipation of a historically long run for "Avatar." Most movies play about three weeks in Imax. If it is as successful as anticipated, "Avatar" is expected to play for about ten weeks. That would break the record for an Imax run set last year by "Dark Knight," which ran for 10 weeks.

Domestic movie theaters are expected to commit to an eight-week initial run for "Avatar," but ultimately that will depend on its performance. If it is disappointing, that could be cut short, and if it becomes as popular as "Titanic" was in its time, it could play even longer. Snyder would not comment on the terms being asked, but Fox is understood to be seeking "premium" terms from exhibitors for what is one of the most highly anticipated movies in years.

Fox has confirmed that the movie cost at least $230 million to make, but there have been reports it is much more than that. Fox is also expected to spend as much as $100 million to advertise, market and promote "Avatar" around the world, and through partnerships with Panasonic (which is using it to launch its new line of 3D TV sets) and licensees like Mattell (toys) and Ubisoft video games, which will pour on millions more in ancillary marketing.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3ied5661580e6e68a15a056eaf4d0a7798?imw=Y

<embed src='http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/player-dest.swf' FlashVars='linkUrl=http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5737218n&releaseURL=http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/player-dest.swf&videoId=50079890&partner=news&vert=News&si=254&autoPlayVid=false&name=cbsPlayer&allowScriptAccess=always&wmode=transparent&embedded=y&scale=noscale&rv=n&salign=tl' allowFullScreen='true' width='425' height='324' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer'></embed><br/><a href='http://www.cbsnews.com'>Watch CBS News Videos Online</a>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnC8KZ2bOik

I can't say I understand the hype around this film. For James Cameron's big return it's certainly ambitious. When I saw the trailer during 2012 I didn't know it was him and just assumed it was so sure-to-flop cheap Sci Fi film that's going to be dumped out. The blue people didn't look that good on the big screen, IMO. I also wasn't impressed with the cast. I had no idea it was this major, big budget event until I read into it. Of course I'm not a big fan of these big budget modern films so I may be completely wrong. Definitely will be interesting to see how it does.

The Leona Lewis song screams of "Cheesy Motion Picture Soundtrack."

The Leona Lewis song screams of "Cheesy Motion Picture Soundtrack."

LMAO! What else did you expect?!

I can't say I understand the hype around this film. For James Cameron's big return it's certainly ambitious. When I saw the trailer during 2012 I didn't know it was him and just assumed it was so sure-to-flop cheap Sci Fi film that's going to be dumped out. The blue people didn't look that good on the big screen, IMO. I also wasn't impressed with the cast. I had no idea it was this major, big budget event until I read into it. Of course I'm not a big fan of these big budget modern films so I may be completely wrong. Definitely will be interesting to see how it does.

Well, no one here cares about plot. There are more clichés than holes in the Swiss cheese.

What will be interesting to see it how it does in box office, the revolutionary 3D filming technology with stereoscopic cameras (so this movie should be seen in 3D cinema), whether the music will be revolutionary too as Horner promised (most likely - not) and so on...

Well, no one here cares about plot. There are more clichés than holes in the Swiss cheese.

What will be interesting to see it how it does in box office, the revolutionary 3D filming technology with stereoscopic cameras (so this movie should be seen in 3D cinema), whether the music will be revolutionary too as Horner promised (most likely - not) and so on...

But if it doesn't do so hot in the box office, will studios be less reluctant to use this 3D Technology for their films?

Stupid question, is this based on the Nickelodeon cartoon of the same name?

Stupid question, is this based on the Nickelodeon cartoon of the same name?

I had some geek friends refer to this cartoon the other day as the sole reason why they wouldn't see avatar.

No, it's not. LOL.