Jump to content

Scott Hamner Says Y&R Is NOT Doing A Gay Story


Recommended Posts

  • Members

And this is where I find the most fault with this writing regime. The gay story(or the gay stuff) wasn't the problem. It was the way in which it was presented and teased, like some 1980's Steven Carrington taboo. Adam, a core character, uses a gay man for sex so he can keep his secret. Phillip, thought to be dead for 20 years, returns a stick-up-the-ass self-righteous puffed up queen with no remorse about the way he left his wife and family and his own f**king son! That he created. That [!@#$%^&*] works well for Van Hansis, not a man in his mid 40's who has been lying to his family for years.

You have gay people working behind and in front of the scenes of these shows and you mean to tell me that you couldn't have asked any one of them about what their experiences were like coming out? Surely SOMEONE could have provided some insight.

Maria's been given plenty of chances and plenty of time to write for multiple characters in multiple storylines. I've given her the benefit of the doubt plenty of times and she has continued to disappoint.

Not only is this WOMAN a self-hating misogynist, she's also a racist and a homophobe. And if she's not, then I sure as hell can't tell because she puts her name on this sh*t every single day in the credits.

Call a spade a spade. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The general article was talking about gay storylines on Y&R, which Hamner said wouldn't be happening at all, at least not soon.

And if any other gay storyline was planned, why didn't he mention it in the fall previews he gave? There is nothing planned for a gay character on Y&R, no gay storyline, we need to accept that. They used the gay media for attention and the gay element of Rafe and Phillip III for shock, and nothing more.

If Phillip III were getting a boyfriend for example, Hamner would have mentioned that in his fall preview, and he didn't. The fact that Bierdz's six month contract ends during the fall tells me he won't be around much longer. Also, the fact that Rafe is still only a recurring characters, tells me they have no intention of developing him or giving him a life outside of the people he usually interacts with.

As it stands, both Rafe and Phillip III are hardly ever on screen, and there hasn't been anything as little as a hint about those characters getting anything resembling a storyline soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the core daytime audience is still quite conservative, since there have been boycotts and such when gay stories are introduced. Y&R did stop Vikki/Neil when fans spoke out, so I think they are susceptible to fan pressure. I think it's a cycle. They cater to the very conservative, so now soaps are dependent on that audience and can't really do a lot of cutting edge stories without losing it's core. But they can't attract a younger audience as long as they are showing this strange, antiquated version of American society. It's like we are stuck in a conservative version of the 80's or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for the spellcheck. Now if you'll excuse yourself, I'm sure there's a OLTL/Ron Carlivati fanwanking thread that is in DIRE need of your attention.

I'm sure you're sick of the "dick measuring" in the Y&R thread. And since you think you have the biggest one of all, then you are free to leave with your John Holmes tucked in your jockeys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If they ever had any bigger plans for Rafe, with anyone, I don't know if this ever made it to the screen. From the start his character has been so irrelevant. He would vanish for long periods of time, they never built up a relationship with Adam. They deliberately wanted it to be about shocking people and about the act itself, not those involved. On ATWT, they clearly had some plans, as Luke and Noah kissed several times, then obviously caved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would think longtime viewers would be more concerned over Y&R's original intentions for Phillip than newbie Rafe. I'm sure months from now when Thom Bierdz is long-gone from the show and has personally vowed to never return, he'll admit what bogusness really went on behind the scenes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, no, we eschewed the "[RON CARLIVATI/MARIA BELL/ETC] IS A FAILURE AS A [MAN/WOMAN/ANIMAL/MINERAL/VEGETABLE] AND A LOVER" threads for something I like to call "the weekly thread."

So that's where my underwear's been going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll be surprised if Thom criticizes them, unless they have Phillip go straight or become some nut. I don't think he'll ever say anything negative about the story, even if it wasn't what he expected, because he's probably honored they brought him back at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So very true. So many of the Y&R fans that write in to the show make it a point in their first sentence to add that they've been watching since day one. They're not young liberal peeps. And even though Y&R began as an edgy, provocative soap, it is now the stuffiest, conservative dinosaur out of all 8 soaps. I mean, c'mon, Cane goes and marries Chloe because he knocked her up and had to do the noble thing? That's straight up 1950's!

Y&R still has fans that will write in anonymously and "accuse" Y&R of being "nigger-lovers" because they paired up Phyllis with African-American Damon. And not surprisingly, the letter was postmarked from Arkansas...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the conservatism has more to do with those in charge than just the show itself. Sheffer adds a very sexist, bigoted tone to any soap he writes for. Hamner isn't much better. Rauch has little time for strong women or minorities. I know the show has never been a daring soap, but they have never been quite this extremely conservative in a long time. Seeing Chloe try to give custody of Delia to Billy and Chloe because her child needs a mother and father...blech.

Perhaps if they had planned a big gay story, fans would have been angry, but I don't think Y&R ever even made the effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy