Jump to content

Y&R Episode Discussion for the week of July 20


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Well, I'm on record as enjoying Deacon. And I didn't find his scenes with Amber as anything but playful....so far.

But what I was feeling was "poor BDW/SWs". Because all the backstory happened on another show. "April", "Little D", "Jackie and her boy toy"...all of that referenced another show. For a guy like me, who watches both and LOVES cross-overs, it was good. But for the average Y&R viewer??? That's a lot of baggage for the writers to carry.

I'm not understanding why Amber can't tell Daniel about Deacon? They didn't do anything too horrible together, that I recall.

ETA: I don't think Mac would encourage a deception (Cane stays hidden in the hideaway). She's all about forthright honesty. So, this stuff with Cane rings false to me.

I did like how JT seemed to be protecting Colleen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 277
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

April was the singer, wasn't she?

But what was Jackie and her boy toy? Jackie, Nick's mom, wasn't on the show back then, was she? When I see her now and think of her back then, she's like a completely different character.

If Amber were 19 and still trying to discover herself, or if she was really feeling unhappy with Daniel for months- trying to express her true self this whole time and he was holding her back, maybe Deacon prying into her life by blackmailing her for sex would work to a certain extent...

Then again, it just wouldn't.

So I think Deacon must be lying to her. He must've seen how her designs have made her buckloads of cash and wants in on it, so he's lying to her, right? Right?

I mean, who wants to have cheap sex with woman you haven't seen in years?

Oh right, Billy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, April was Amber's dark haired hitherto-unknown twin, the singer.

Jackie--Nick's mom--was Deacon's last lover before he left the show. During this time, Massimo had a paralyzing stroke, and Deacon taunted Mass about how he was gonna f*ck Jackie and Mass couldn't stop it.

Deacon and Amber were nice, but nothing in their backstory explains his driving lust for her now, or why she is hiding her past. Either something happened between them after they both left B&B or something... That said, since Amber and Deacon "share" a son, there is emotionally interesting territory to mine if they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't believe that was the same character. She's a completely different person now, like Taylor. Only traces are left of them.

I think the tawdry element of Deacon and Amber's past was the fact that the baby was supposed to be Rick's and it was actually her cousin, Becky's and Deacon's right? Didn't Amber's baby with Usher die and she switched them? Something to that effect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Amber f*cked both Usher and Rick in the same time frame. She was passing her baby off as Rick's, but was desperately afraid a brown baby would come out and give her away. She needed a white baby to trap those Forrester millions.

So she high-tailed it to mama's, to give birth in her Furnace Creek trailer. Sadly the (white) baby was stillborn. Fortunately, Amber's cousin Becky was nine months pregnant, and she didn't want to keep her baby. So Amber and Tawny took care of that, and passed "little Eric" off as Rick's.

As you know, later Becky wanted the baby back, but when she died tragically of cancer, she gave the child back to cuz Amber. Deacon eventually got the kid, although I don't remember how/why. Last we heard, the child was being raised by Becky's parents. I wonder what is happening now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm pretty sure Deacon knows that backstory. That would frighten Amber into submission, I think. Baby switching is actually pretty wretched in the real world. Not as heinous as burning a fetus, obviously, but unethical nonetheless. ;) I'm sure she doesn't want Daniel to know about that time of her reckless life.

Once Amber came to Genoa City, we had to know that B&B would continue to affect Y&R somehow. If it's Deacon, I'll take it for now. He's hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Daniel's mother is Phyllis, for goodness sake. Also, Daniel is no saint himself. Deacon should have very little power over Amber. Then again, that would require character-driven and not plot-driven writing.

Amber's babyswitch is small potatoes next to the crimes and felonies committed daily by the GC denizens. How creepy is Victor trying to crush Colleen? Ewww...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cane "thought" of everything with the lies to marry Lily, the way Johnny thought of everything to get Gilda to marry him.

Johnny's a con man, lied to get Gilda to marry him, even though they were in love.

Gilda thinks they're in love - finds out Johnny's lying to him.

Johnny narrates the movie, so this wasn't his dialogue to her. This is narration. Gilda couldn't stand knowing why he had lied to her. So she sought him out. (See Lane spoilers/promo.)

Cue forshadowing.

Gilda (Lily) feels like she's been living in a vacuum since her husband abandoned her. Cane thinks he's giving her peace and quiet by not going to the hospital.

Gilda wants Johnny to disappear from her life again, to let her go. But in the movie, she falls apart on him, realizes she'll never be over him. And she can never let him go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love how you answered before I did.

I'm not even describing Amber's decisions as if I sympathize with them. I understand them as elements to move the plot along, nothing further. I just think this is what's driving her to prevent this information from Daniel because I'm giving TPTB the benefit of the doubt that they actually have some sort of dirt on Amber and her past as a pseudo-mother isn't really what she'd keep from Daniel.

Although, again, in real life, if you keep something like a child's existence from your lover, it's pretty unbelievable. Daniel doesn't even know about Little Eric, right? It would be detrimental to their relationship, that she never told Daniel about him. He would feel betrayed and disrespected, which is much worse than her telling him she had some sort of sordid past with Deacon.

So keeping Deacon's connection away from Daniel makes absolute sense to me, if this is what TPTB are working on. It's really the only thing that is solid... in my head LOL.

Otherwise, as it was since the beginning, this s/l sucks monkeyballs LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy