Jump to content

All: Why do most soaps suck monkeyba----?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

That's such an odd manifestation of "ego" though. Seriously. You'd think it would be about succeeding instead of about setting a path that leads you directly over the edge of the cliff, and simply refusing to divert because you'd be forced to admit you were . . . wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

We all see that, rhinohide. But there seems to be a lot of it going around in daytime right now. Hire your friends, instead of what's good for the show. Deliver whatever your budget can handle, even if it's crap, just to stay on the air one day longer. And refuse to learn from the mistakes of others. All three seem to be the order of the day, which is a shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So would I -- though I thought AD lost its way at the end of Season 2/first half of Season 3 and stopped being funny. However, that's a topic for another thread. What I'm saying is, B&B seems to be trying to do a parody of a soap. A comedy show. Except Bradley Bell is no Mitchell Hurwitz. And these parody soaps do not work (Not just Passions -- Ugly Betty, Dirty Sexy Money? I'm looking at you). I like my camp served straight. And for it to be served straight, it needs some grounding. B&B seems to be written and produced on a day-by-day basis with every kind of dumbness thrown at it in a desparate bid to see what sticks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It seems to me that soaps or the networks themselves are trying too hard to outdo each other. The competition these days seem to be who can do a baby switch better than the other. In 2003, the competition was whether or not a soap could do a serial killer SL better than the other. Maybe it wasn't the quality that counted, but garnering ratings were a strong factor. I suspect that by the end of the year, soaps might start competing in who can do a coming out story. [!@#$%^&*] the quality, it's all about shock value, and capturing ratings and revenue, they've completely forgotten about quality, and character, and the rest that made soaps great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But can we date this to the possession?? Or did it start with the Left Handed Boy and the Ice Princess? Or when Roger Thorpe plunged to his death?

I mean, these things have been around for a long time, haven't they? I think the thing that has changed is their ubiquity and frequency. Now Guza blows something up EVERY sweeps. And apparently Y&R is going for heightened drama too right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it did begin back during Roger Thorpe/Ice Princess - but then I feel like the shows got back on track in the mid-80's and by the end of the 80's, they started to find their own identities again. Then the one-two punch of OJ/The Possession changed all the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Regarding B&B: It is indeed obvious that Brad Bell is just completely and severely burned out. He's done. He did everything that he could do, he made up every possible story he could make up and now he just does not have anymore in him. Cue the incessant love triangles, the musical beds... people wonder why he always breaks Brooke and Ridge up or destroys popular couples just like that. Well, because breaking them up will at least provide him with two more weeks of story, which he would otherwise not have. It's so sad....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy