Jump to content

December 5-9, 2005


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

good point dimples, well I guess perople relize that Days is about to revisted the same storyline that played out 10 years ago and then don't want to watch it plus you have Jack dead for like the 100th time. I guess the return of Christie Clarke didn't help them. I wonder will it go up when Carrie and Austin reunite and the last week od december, that when Days really starts to rise.

Congrats to the ABC and CBS soaps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

DAYS didn't promote Clark's return at all... Certainly not on the scale that GH promoted the return of Springfield. DAYS promoted Wayne Northrop's return much more.

But still, in any case, DAYS has nothing really exciting going on, it's just day to day dialogue. Carrie wasn't even on the entire week, (nor was there much to indicate that the show was going to repeat the triangle again), she returned Friday and wasn't even on Monday!! All they did was have business talk. The dramatic Jack stuff was the week before. This week was predominantly about Claire. Still... nothing big. DAYS is lucky it didn't actually drop...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Last week was mostly the Claire drama. Lots of Kate talking to herself about Shawn. Lots of Sami, Austin, and Lucas. Carrie was around, but not on much, I don't think. Shawn, Mimi and Nicole were around here and there. Jennifer, Bo, Hope, Frankie were on a little bit. Friday was the day Jack popped up at the end of the show, I think. I don't think Alex, Marlena, and John were on one day last week.

Got that right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days actually hung onto its numbers-had everyone else not had big events going on then they would have been at like #5 in the ratings. That is pretty good considering that last week was good but not the type of thing that people other then regular viewers would tune in for. Days will definitely go up this week and probably the next 3 weeks at least for the holidays. They always do for all soaps starting this week. The first week of December is traditionally a week where soaps drop or just stand pat since people are out shopping and doing other things. This year was different since alot of the soaps had highly publicized events. Plus, there was a snow storm in some parts of the country and there may have been more people snowed in who watch ABC and CBS or something.

Just the fact that Days held on is good-I thought they would drop. Now I know for the next couple weeks they will go up and depending on the stories maybe hit the high 3's. I am very confident in my show-Days is rockin and I am sure the next few weeks will be reflecting that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days hitting the high 3's? I doubt it. B&B hasnt done it yet and it has had explosive events. For Days to hit the high 3's it would have to overtake B&B in the ratings or B&B would have to hit the 4's. Anything is possible but I dont see it. Unless they get Stefano back as their secrect weapon or surprise.

But you sure are confident, I will give you that. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The week before Christmas and the week in between Christmas and New Years are usually high high weeks for all soaps. OLTL, DAYS, AMC, ATWT all have a good chance to at least hitting the 3.0 mark or close to it in the next couple of weeks....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow lol you really do hate GL :lol: I am indifferent to it because I do not watch it but the general concensus around various boards seems to be that it isn't exactly all it could be right now....

I just hear about the incest stuff and go YUCK :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow to those ratings, especially Friday! :o I know ATWT had a good cliffhanger that day leading into this week, which has been outstanding and Y&R had that beautiful wedding episode with musical guest Chris Botti. 4.7 (YR) is amazing these days! Poor ATWT just can't break that 2.8 ceiling they have though. And not getting my hopes up for them getting into the 3's next week because for some reason every time ATWT is at it's best the ratings don't reflect it lol. But it would be nice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Your use of the word "apparently" would need to include a source. Just your use of the word doesn't make it true or valid. Where would you get the idea that something has happened if you hadn't already received an indication from somewhere else, specifically a valid source (including Tabyana herself)? By using the word "apparently," you are implying this was mentioned somewhere, either in a publication or similar.
    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy