Jump to content

DAYS: "The Early Years" tribute now available


Recommended Posts

  • Members

The early years of "Days of Our Lives" have now been documented online for the first time. Complete yearly episode rankings are now available for 1965, 1966, 1967, 1972, 1973, and 1974. Partial episode rankings are now available for 1968, 1971 and 1975. More years will be released in the future. Also, photo galleries of almost every actor who appeared in at least five episodes during those years are now posted. Plus, check out some early promotional "Days" photos from 1965-1975 and enjoy a trip down memory lane with a complete "Days" wedding album from 1965-1979. All that and more at http://www.jason47.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Amazing historical reference. The pictures were incredible. I learned so much...like the fact that Carla Borelli and Brooke Bundy both worked on Days before Texas and GH respectively.

thank you so much for all you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved Carla as Mary. She was very far different from Reena - even Reena on AW before Texas.

Brooke Bundy was wonderful as Rebecca. I always felt that someone down the line would bring back her son to the show since he is Hope's only sibling.

ETA:

I realized this morning while lying in bed that Dougie is Hope's only sibling by Doug. Steven and Julie are her siblings by her mother Addie. What an idiot to not remember that. That was a stupid mistake for me. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never knew Jed Allan was on Days as far back as 71.Most sources list him as joining in 74/75.

He was on once in 71 and 8 times in 72,which leads me to believe he was recurring and then Bill Bell decided to make him a regular.

Also John Lupton as Tommy was on only a few times in 72.It seems Bill Bell had no interest in developing Tommy as a character after it was revealed who he was.

Looking at 1967,Tom,Alice,Mickey,Bill,Susan and Laura all had over 100 appearnces for the year,then Marie at 94.There is a huge dropoff to the 7th ranked character of David with 52.Those characters must have really carried the story that year.

Interesting that Tom and Alice had big numbers although they were not the lead players.Those were the days when older characters were given a point of view and visibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WEll see it never was weird to me. I know it is to those who didn't watch back then, but I watched it. So it never felt icky to me because I watched Doug's marriage to Addie. At first I hated them together but then they actually fell in love. It was heart breaking.

William J. Bell had such a way of writing that he even made you care for the alternate couple.

As much as I loved Doug & Julie and Bill & Laura, I equally loved Doug & Addie, Bill & Susan, and Mickey & Laura. They were all great couples.

And what else was so unique is that in all the relationships they did not include one person you could really hate. Most triangles today have the main couple being separated by an interloper that is conniving or you automatically hate. IN these stories there was not one.

You felt for all the interlopers in those stories: Don Craig, Mark Anderson, Scott Banning, Susan Martin, Addie Olson - they were all good characters and equally likable.

Boy do I miss those Days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well Pat Falken Smith and even Ann Marcus kept it going pretty good into the late 70's. Their triangles were still good and you did feel for the "third" party but none of the them really turned out to be great long term characters esp. the ones in the Don/Marlena romance.

Some of their best stuff I would say was the Neil/Greg/Amanda triangle in which Neil was supposed to be the "third" wheel but ended up being the best character even though early on he was often really bad with some of the things he did.

And they had a great young romance story with DAvid, Trish, Valerie, Michael, and Margot. There was not one character in that was "bad" - all were sympathetic. Of course you did have bad girl Brooke thrown in there but she was quickly escorted out of that story more into the Bob - Mary story.

The only thing they did was to speed things up a little more than with Bell. Their couples didn't have to wait 10 years to get together, but they kept the tradition that they didn't stay together happily. Of course some of them never got together but more so due to writer changes.

I guess that is one of the most frustrating things about the latter 70's is that people who loved David/Valerie, Mike/Trish, Don/Marlena, and Chris/Mary never got any fulfillment with the relationships. Only one of them married and they were quickly broken up and even though you waited for them to get back together later writers just didn't let it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought her second stint was okay. I didn't enjoy it nearly - even in the same ball park as her first stint. I know some on here feel it was great, but I still see her 2nd stint as the root of what lead Days down the path that took it far away from what it was and the show that was created by Corday, Chase and Phillips.

She had some good things, but it seemed just like while she was away working for Gloria Monty that she forgot everything William J. Bell taught her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy