Jump to content

Confessions of an ex-soap writer


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

You need to research it a bit.

Anyway... Primetime shows — perhaps the majority, not all — have a nice practice. In the writers’ room everyone plots. All the writers contribute to all episodes. So once the whole team outlines the episode, the show runner picks a writer who gets the notes and the basic plot and goes to type out his script.

:)

Kubla, do you know how did that whole pitching process when Lorraine was there worked? I'm referring to that story Johnson & Beldner and another writer, I'm forgetting which one, proposed to her? Did they just make a suggestion or did they also write the synopsis for the story or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry to butt in, but did you both mean to be this dismissive?

When I look at the title of this board it is "Soap Opera Network" not "Soap Opera Aspiring Writers Network". So OF COURSE there are many of us who haven't got a CLUE about the process.

Rather than peer over top the spectacles and send folks to the library, what about educatin' the dumb folk?

Back to lurkdom on this issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, I honestly didn't mean it like that.

If I was mean, alphanguy, I apologize. :)

The problem, Mark, is that so little info gets out of this offices and soaps, it's more guarded than Fort Knox, and every head writer has his/her own way of doing things so it is difficult to generalise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which was not a smart decision, if you ask me. Especially when, in the long run, it made not a difference in Iris' attitude toward Mac.

Meanwhile, I'm surprised no one has nominated Mr. Hiltbrand as soaps' potential new messiah. I thought by now we'd see "David Hiltbrand should HW [enter show name here]!" posts all over the place. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it was meant to make a change in Iris' attitude but to make her more of a fighter and to explore more of her character. It also strengthened her feeling of being unloved by all the men in her life. And it made her long even more for Mac's love in the light of she was the only daughter in his life and now she was competing for him with Amanda. Add to that now Amanda was his blood and she was not. It made her fight even harder to make Mac love her and notice her.

It was an excellent set up.

Beverlee McKinsey was really great all throughout her tenure on AW but from 1978 to 1980 she was remarkable. Lemay gave her some of the greatest material to work with those years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally meant to be dismissive. It wasn't a dismissal due to someone's lack of knowledge regarding the process -- it was a dismissal to someone's lack of knowledge about the process AND dogging a show that I enjoy while citing their favorite show as being so wonderful for using a process they don't even use. If the poster knew about the process and actually researched it (listening to their favorite show's former HW Kay Alden's lecture two years ago, for example), then they would know that Y&R's writing process works virtually identical to the way AMC's does. Head writer writes the long term, breakdown writers write the outlines and script writers write the dialogue. As far as "educatin' the dumb folk" rather than sending them to the library, I'd be more than happy to if I was asked to do so. Otherwise, I'm not responsible for educating someone who dives into a conversation with misinformation and a jab at a show they don't watch. They weren't asking for education at all. It was just yet another attempt at being divisive.

But thanks for asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know one actor who said that he thought it would be better if the writers could be physically closer to where the show gets done. He acknowledged that it isn't necessarily feasible but that level of collaboration would probably result in a better product or at least a better creative process. IMO, there's something good that happens when everyone is in the same place that you can't duplicate using other forms of communication. But this is the 21st century, so break out the Blackberrys and hope for the best.

And please don't smack me around for not knowing how the whole BTS thing works. I don't claim to. I just thought I'd throw that out there. Just consider me the little girl rocking and weeping in the corner while Uncle Sylph, Mark and R Sinclair fight with each other at the family barbecue.

*sings to herself* Yes Jesus loves me...Yes Jesus loves me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just saw this now!

There totally is. But in certain ways, it might be cheaper for them not to have the room. Not to say anything about the fact that you can sit in your cottage somewhere in the Godforsaken hills, type your script and after you finish, just hit: Send! (For me, that's exactly the problem.)

:lol:

Don't worry, marceline, very few people can claim that they know exactly how things work, and in detail, at any givetime. Head writers change, bring with them tiny adjustments so it's all in a state of flux. But the basics, I think, remain constant.

I would, however, like to know whether any of today's HWs writes story projections...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, All My Children does use a different process from other shows.

Not trying to cross R Sinclair's path or anything - but their process is different now. The script writer receives a summary of what's in their episode, and has a day or two to make their own outline, breaking down all the scenes, and then only four or five days to write a script (as opposed to the seven other soaps get). So there's definitely a time crunch AMC has, and a double-duty they're forced to do, that other shows aren't under.

I'm not saying it's better or worse - but I do think you need somebody experienced in both breakdowns and scripts, like a Michelle Patrick or an Addie Walsh. Whereas most shows give breakdown writers three or four days to write a breakdown, and script writers a week to write a show, AMC needs somebody to do the whole process in six or seven days. So there's definitely a lot less time for exploration and concentration. You have to just get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The woman who was the co-chair of Latinas for Trump is now complaining about his targeting immigrants that she thought were "safe." I also read a puff piece from yet another "insider" journalist who lives to normalize fascists - this one with a tech bro who was venting off the record because he thought voting for Trump was cool and would show up the Democrats and maybe we'd get Greenland, but now he's getting upset.  These people still support Trump, and Republicans, they just want to make sure they get credit for being respectable. And they will get it.
    • I really do wish someone could. Just a few characters in very simple backdrops, with very real problems that are just a little larger than life, like the '50s and '60s. All the characters having a level of dignity or respect. And their inner lives are what dominate the story, even if there are outside forces at play.
    • It's a lesson to never be loyal because once your use is up, you're shown the door. MSW was the only bright spot for CBS for awhile, and once they were back on top... they promptly sabotaged the show as a repayment for all that the show had done for the network.  
    • The show made a mistake in not bringing in more McKinnon kids, specifically bringing back Ben. Kathleen was leaving, and while I like you am very fond of Sally Spencer as MJ, that didn't seem to be a common view. They also decimated the character in a truly sick storyline. So that just left Cheryl. 
    • Between Gwen and Cat, the show often seems to side with those who cause lots of cruelty to Jack and Jennifer. I am half-surprised that the show hasn't brought Peter Blake back for more of the same.  I don't really know if there is a purpose for them in Salem now, but I do feel a sense of stability and rightness when Melissa Reeves is back in the role of Jennifer and back in the Horton house, in spite of...well, a lot of offcamera stuff we all know perfectly well. 
    • I like to call her an FC-reject character

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m sensing you’re not really a John Black fan from your posts. This has been some of the best soap Days has done in many years but you seem completely opposed to it lol.
    • The John Black character has been a part of my life for decades. I like heroes being honored, however imperfect they may be.  I'm glad they are giving him a long farewell and tribute.
    • Annie Dutton was anything, but sane when she was introduced.  She was very tortured and looked like she was on the verge of tears when she was first introduced.   While people, and writers, made it seem as though Annie lost her mind because of Josh.. I truly think that Annie had a lot of untreated mental issues that didn't manifest until her marriage to Josh. Sonni was also anything, but strong when she was first introduced either.   Claire in 1983 was a complete 180 from the Claire that we got in 1986... and I do agree that her character was degraded.
    • I remember seeing him briefly when Rick went to confront her about her blackmailing him. (I briefly forgot that Rick's sleeping with Claire at this time was a retcon - or her lying that she slept with him, whatever that story was). I wonder if he interacted with Kurt given that Mark Lewis later took his ATWT role. I tried to watch some of the full episode and it was all so alien and uninvolving. Roxy having a meltdown on that construction site for Mindy and Kurt's house that never gets built. Ed with Ross and Vanessa dealing with custody issues. Even Ross and Vanessa seemed flat, with Vanessa seeming oddly meek.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy