Jump to content

Star Trek recipe for soaps?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Sorry to be late to the party, but I just have to say this thread has been bothering me since it began. Indeed, when they started trashing Trek and the new Doctor Who I thought..."Damn, I belong on a different planet".

Then, Vee, thank HEAVENS you come along and say what I was thinking, but lacked the eloquence to say!

What a terrific, terrific post!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think you hit on what would revitalize the soaps. The answer is not special effects, or some "reinvention of the wheel" solution. It is to go back to the fundamentals----tell a good story. Give your audience hope. Stop glorifying violence. Show characters growing---not perfect---but bettering themselves in some way.

Star Trek, for all the bells and whistles, was a morality play. It took the issues of the day, threw them into space, and dealt with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sylph, you don't get to me because you never surprise me. In fact, I don't think you surprise anyone. Maybe that's why you're sitting here talking about writing for a living while some of us are doing it. And that's why you fail to understand the lesson of Star Trek, or Doctor Who, or soaps - yes, even the dreaded soaps (remember, this is a soap forum, not an encounter group) have something to teach us.

Maybe if you spent a little less time telling people how they need to feel about soaps and entertainment in order to be smart like you, you'd feel a little less aimless and unfulfilled. At the very least, you'd stop posting off-topic threads all about asking us questions you already think you have the wrong answers to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, it's an insidious trap you've got going when your threads fall apart and you vanish or resort to self-pity every time I appear. It's very simple: As long as you start off-topic threads designed to belittle and demean people for watching soaps, then I'll be around to check you.

But maybe I'll put you on Ignore if you say "please."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They fall apart, I know that the moment I start them, because you enter, the followers salute you, sing songs of praise, and it's done. You kill them every time. I just know it's about to happen.

Ohhhhh... That's it!!!

Never going to happen. The choice is yours: you want to ignore, OK. You don't? Not OK, but acceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't have followers, Sylph. I don't want them. I'm mean to everyone. I called the mods incompetent to their face. But the difference between us is, I don't live to be mean here. I actually talk about soaps on the soap opera board. I don't use the threads as a way to work out my daily manic-depression and misanthropy. Your issues with Y&R, etc. are more about attacking other posters and their "fake-like." Cause ain't nobody can be happy if Sylph ain't happy. And I don't think you've been happy in a long time, darlin'.

You want me to go away, all you have to do is stop hijacking threads to see how many people you can bully and talk down until they break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Everything you do here is off-topic, because it's never really about the soaps. It's about you and testing how badly you can treat people and demean their opinions when you can't do it in the real world. Spend one day, take a deep breath, look through your posting history, and see if you can honestly tell yourself you are not the commonality in these incidents of yours. I'm not even in most of the Y&R threads where you smack people around like two-dollar hoes and they take it for some godforsaken reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Slight redirection of the thread...

I was never a major Trekkie/Trekker. I watched the original show millions of times, and I bought many of the 70s novelizations/short stories (especially the animated series adaptations, Star Trek Log, by Alan Dean Foster). I also was a first-day premiere to see the movies kind of guy (which was not true for anything else, really).

But, by the time TNG came along, I was less interested...I watched when I could, but not religiously. I never saw those TNG movies. I had moved to Europe by the time Voyager and DS9 came along, so I missed their debuts...and wasn't really interested in picking them up when I moved back Stateside. I never saw an episode of Enterprise.

Still, when TNG came along, I remember thinking "You know, why not use the Star Trek universe for a next-generation soap opera? Why not set it on one of the Federation space stations? That would be like a small town. You could build on an established audience, have male-appeal, reinvent the soap opera (at least in context)".

Well, then DS9 came along, and that kind of shot my innovativeness to hell :).

But it did make me wonder why, outside of Dark Shadows/Passions, nobody ever explored grafting the soap format onto a different genre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just for clarification, when you say "soap format" do you mean make a daily production of it? Because I think that's what makes soaps a "bad" bet for any network. It's too cost prohibitive. Otherwise, I think the soapiness has been grafted onto other genres although most frequently sci-fi. For all its mythology, time travel and quantum physics, Lost is really just one romance after another in the bigger context of good vs. evil. Although soaps seems to have drifted away from good vs evil a bit but that's for a different thread. Assuming I'd be allowed to start it.

A wise decision. One I wish that I'd made. Unfortunately, I'll follow Bakula into the jaws of death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're right, I meant the daily format--and I meant grafting melodrama and romance and community and social issues onto something like a "space station" or "futuristic" universe. I personally think the serial is alive and well in primetime and cable...flourishing even...which is why the demise of daytime doesn't worry me much. But moving the soap (daily melodrama) beyond the living rooms and kitchens and hospitals and law offices...into new universes (in it's day...the Western...sci fi) never seems to have been seriously tried, outside of brief experiments at OLTL.

I don't so much mean now, for the economic reasons you indicate. But in the heyday (whenever that was...let's pretend late 70s/early 80s), why did they never migrate/expand to new genres? Luke and Laura and the weather machine showed that there could be an appetite for (bad) sci fi in daytime, and the long run of Edge showed, to a point, that the cop show could flourish there.

Nowadays--I'm with you. With the Big Three shortening primetime seasons to 10-13 episodes, there is no budget to move soaps in this direction. These soaps will coast out their remaining days, and then that daily thing is done for a while.

LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy