Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Well, knowing Lemay's style -- Jason may have been murdered, but it is unlikely there would have been a trial.  Lemay detested murder trials, although he never seemed to have a problem with murders.  LOL.   How many murders were there in Lemay's original run (1971-79)? Several.  How many murder trials? One -- which lasted less than a week, and the case was dismissed by the judge. So there was very little courtroom drama, and no verdict.  

No idea how Lemay would have handled AW's 25th anniversary. Although he loved mining the past, and bringing it to the present -- big celebrations and special episodes were not really Lemay's thing.  Perhaps he would have given the 25th to his son, Steve, to write.   

But I can assure everyone, Mac's death would have been handled in a completely different way, had Lemay still been head-writer. There likely would have been no storyline (Red Swan, or otherwise) surrounding Mac's passing.  He simply would have died in his sleep or something like that.  And the entire event would have been character-driven, not plot-driven.  We'd have seen Rachel, Liz, Ada, Iris, Jamie etc., reacting to Mac's death.  And believe me -- that would have been more than enough to satisfy the audience, under Lemay's pen.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

P&G/NBC killed Another World beginning with the 90 minute expansion in 1979. Harding Lemay quit the show a few months later. Realizing the 90 minute show wasn't clicking, the next costly decision was the Texas Spinoff.  Texas had no chance going up GH. Moving Another World to 2 pm was the next blow. The show never recovered.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The 90 minute show was Fred Silverman's idea & since he was the Vice President in charge of  programming at NBC Daytime he had considerable pull. (Pete, WOST interview, 2006, Y/T.) Pete fought against it. Paul Rauch, EP, sided with NBC. Pete had already become disenchanted with the expansion to an hour so everything he knew told him 90 minutes would be a disaster. When he was right, he was right in a big way. (Why do I call him Pete? He hated Harding.) Afterward, NBC programmers were asked why they had decided to try the 90 minute show. They were quoted as saying they couldn't think of anything else to try. And, the bad part of this wasn't over yet. The NBC affiliates had long preferred AW as their pet but they HATED the 90 minute show & as far as they knew it had been AW's choice. So, they switched their affections to DAYS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Keeping Another World at 3 pm was the best move after cutting back to 60 minutes. Possibly Another World doesn't lose its audience when it move to 2 pm.  Another World had problems to solve. Without the creation of Texas, Beverlee McKinsey was leaving. The Frame family was moving off the canvas. The Holloway Family wasn't working. 

Maybe bringing back the character of Sharlene Frame in 1980 had endless possibilities. At this point, Josie would be a little girl with the mystery surrounding who the father was. Russ Matthews is on the front burner and creates discourse with his new bride Tracey Dewitt.  Perhaps Sharlene has a connection to Jason Dunlap and ILSA FREDERICKS.  Just a thought...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We know they didn't have enough video to do what they wanted & ended up relying on Eddie & the AWHP for that. I don't know whether he dealt with P&G or NBC. But my point is that it might not have fallen much on his shoulders because of either network or P&G involvement. 

Very likely that there still would have been a Cory anniversary story being planned so he'd have to deal with that but I don't know why that would have been a problem for him. When it came to Cory Publishing Mac was driven & ambitious. Heart attack waiting to happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember SOD had an opinion piece about AW during Swajeski's stint as headwriter and the main thing they thought hindered AW was episode breakdowns.  They gave an example about how two characters would just about be ready to kiss on a Friday while a third character was about to walk into the room.  Then Monday would roll around with no follow up on the cliffhanger.. but then on Tuesday's episode, it would pick up right around the time of the Friday cliffhanger with the before mentioned character about ready to enter the room as the two characters were just about to kiss.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sounds about right. I remember something dramatic would happen on Monday and then it wouldn't be talked about until Thursday of that week. Swajeski was not great at breaking the stories down for the week. Some critics (might even be in the article you're referencing) complaining about this very thing in relation to the Sam/Amanda/Evan storyline as the momentum in that was so bizarre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is misinformation. The AWHP was not even around for the show’s 25th anniversary. The show did consult the AWHP for Victoria Wyndham’s 25th anniversary as Rachel, which occurred nearly a decade later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy