Jump to content

Soaps Original Openings


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I know there have been threads before about the shows main titles/themes,but I thoiught I'd put a different slant on it...

Apart from Days,which has maintained it's original opening(with slight modifications)since it's debut,all the other shows have updated/changed theirs.

Y&R returned to the original music after the 'porno'theme but every other show has moved on.

Do you think this is a good thing?

Should the shows updated every say,5 years or so,to reflect the changes on the show,or should they have stuck with the original titles?

Back in the 70's most of the shows kept the original openings.

AMC from 70-90

AW had the 'concentric rings'from around 66 till 81

ATWT had the spinning globe from 56-81

SFT had the clouds from 51-81(with different music)

Secret Storm had waves crashing throughout 60's and 70's etc

Interestingly,Guiding Light was one show that did change its opening quite regularly.

Are the any original opening titles that you think could still work today(as they were,or with slight updates?)

I think Y&R could still go with the character sketches.

AMC with the book would be fine by me

The openings with character pictures present problems in terms of updates.

Also,with the move towards shorter openings,a quick title card would work eg the spinning globe,title ATWT and a snatch of music

Please post about original themes and your opinions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I remember how much I enjoyed the porn opening on Y&R and OLTL. Just loved 'em.

Which shows me I like it when they switch it up and give us something new. It is a way of updating (putting in present context) a show with a longer history.

Ultimately, I kind of like AMC's continued use of the book/bible...updated, but with a continous through line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't mind ABCD's soaps, for example, updating their opening sequences every now and then, but I do mind the fact that each opening no longer has a sense of originality. It's almost Angela Shapiro's concept of one, ginormous "super-soap" come frighteningly to life!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True. I wonder if the drawings would be easier to update...if they want to be lazy, they can PhotoShop pictures into drawings, but that would just be chintzy.

Amen to that. OLTL got the crap end of the deal, though, big time. It looks like the entire cast is gathered together in a back alley for a breakdancing competition. Remember Starr's old pose? I thought she was going through a trap door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, but, take that (the photo album) away, and it's basically the same as OL's and GH's: actors turning their heads every which way in front of some nondescript background, while incessant, over-synthesized music plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think AMC by FAR did the best in adapting the generic format to fit the theme of the show. They kept a lot of photos integrated, the photo album at the end... the fact that all the photos come to life and float up in the air, that makes me feel that the streaks of color they have over people's shots are meant to imply some kind of flip-animation with multiple photos "flipping" to give life to the image. The torn photos during the flying segments that peel away from or float into the frame... the look is consistent overall and they never really lost their general opening credits imagery.

GH just bucked the order and for the most part used green screen shots, rather than the studio lights background (even some shots with studio lights backgrounds were manufactured through green screen!) and they are so frenetic and seizure-inducing I believe they did it to distract from the fact they have no actual concept in their opening. However, the siren light was incorporated enough to give it some kind of central image tying the opening together. I think THEY have an idea of what the opening represents, but no one in the audience has been able to connect to it.

OLTL's is by far the worst product of the homogenized openings, because they never decided on a concept either. From the start of this format you could BARELY tell what was superimposed over the actor's shots, and over time they have even gotten away from fragmented building shots and have used spinning squares and other nonsense as "spice" for their opening. It just looks like a gigantic mish-mosh amounting to absolutely nothing. Their closing title shot is also the worst, and calls to mind no identifying image for the show. Personally, as I've done on YouTube, OLTL should have tried to go back to its Sun/Clouds imagery and worked that more into the opening. My opening titles combined Sun/Clouds imagery with the cast faces/logo type of 1980s OLTL opening titles. Might not be the choice everyone would make, but at the very least it's a CHOICE.

As for the rest, I think B&B's is oddly restrained for such a campy soap, so I'd like to see something bolder, livelier, than they have right now. I always wanted some campy thing like fashion sketches of the cast that come to life. If done properly, mixing enough artwork and live-action images, it could look fantastic.

I'd like Y&R's, if they updated it.

GL should go back to their lifesavers opening.

ATWT really sold itself short with the last cast-featuring opening they had. Concept was good... didn't like the "farmland" theme song they had going, really, but the look was good.

I know Days, the opening is classic, etc, but I always wanted them to include the cast. For a show built so much on supercouples, and characters with rabid fan bases, they sure never touted them in the opening credits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL! I'm resistant to soaps set in farm towns anyway. Doesn't every viewer want to see soaps in a splashy big city?!

The theme, combined with images of farms and windmills, etc, just comes off as a Little House on the Prairie ripoff to me.

Combined with your images, it takes on a classier tone, stately, majestic. It's a combination thing, not a theme on its own thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy