Jump to content

Guiding Light-ways to survive


Recommended Posts

  • Members

How expensive do you think Guiding Light would be to produce, if it kept its current production model, dropped the cast to about 14 contract players, and made it a once a week show that aired on Lifetime or Soapnet? Do you think it would work? Would fans deal with GL only being on once a week?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

They could slash the budget to $.50/wk (if they haven't already), drop the cast to 3 contract players and an extra who plays all the other parts like that dude on "Captain Kangaroo," and air it as an interstitial show between reruns of "RuPaul's Drag Race" on LOGO, and I still don't think fans would accept it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Frankly, MikeGoldy, I don't think GL would succeed in any format on any other network (and I apologize for being flippant in my previous answer). I mean, sure, another network - Lifetime, SN, the Hallmark Channel - could give it a try, but...

1) The success rate of daytime (TV) soaps switching networks is slim-to-nil; and

2) Viewing habits, I believe, are very ingrained, and hard to change. It'd be hard to watch GL once a week on SN, let's say, after watching it for so long every afternoon on CBS.

Plus, I cannot think of any network that would look at the current state of GL, a long-running institution that has struggled for over a decade to reclaim and hold onto its' share of the viewing audience, and see buying it as an attractive proposition. I know *I* would look at it as a network exec and wonder to myself, "What could I do to boost this show and make them a profit-turner for my network, that CBS hasn't tried three times already?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unfortunately it doesn't look like Lifetime is interested. I got an email today - the same email that many others have gotten from Lifetime saying that they have no plans to add daytime serials to their lineup.

Soapnet is probably GL's only hope, other than P&G/Telenext footing the whole bill and doing an internet type of a very very watered down version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What did you expect them to say? Hey, thanks for writing us, we are in negotiations and hope to bring Guiding Light to you someday soon?! :lol:

It's a form response from the head of viewer relations. It's business 101. I wouldn't read too much into the response. Who really knows if GL will find a home after that network that shall not be named. We know that talks are taking place. I have faith and will continue to put forth every effort to let them know that we want to see GL continue. I think GL is a much more viable show than that network gave them credit for being. But only time will tell.

In the meantime, I will continue to be in awe of the actors on this show, JLH's writing, and all things Otalia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here is a scenario where GL has a slim - and I do mean slim - chance of surviving well into the future:

1) GL is moved to a network that is available in the majority of households in this country. If you think GL could make a new home for itself on some obscure channel you can access only if/when you subscribe to an expensive digital cable tier, think again.

2) When GL is on, it's on at the same time (...more or less...) on the new network that it was on the old. I realize many fans watch GL at 10 am; however, for most of the U.S., I believe, it's 2 or 3 pm, depending on the time zone.

3) GL's quality, at least in terms of its producing and writing, is improved dramatically. IOW, changes must be made at the top.

4) GL's budget with the new network has to be, at the very least, comparable to what it is now. As it is, the budget is already threadbare. Anything less, IMO, would be beyond embarrassing, and downright insulting.

5) GL cannot afford now to be nostalgic, or to do "more of the same". GL, at its' new home, must be different. I'm not talking production values here. I'm talking about truly rebuilding this show from the inside out. What will keep this show alive on the new network that adheres to its core values, but at the same time, is fresh and unique and unlike anything we might've seen in the past?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Geez, some of the responders here are pretty flippant.

I wouldn't go so far as to expect Lifetime to have said that they are in negotiations, but they could have left the door opened a little bit by saying something like they are always looking at programming options instead of saying outright that they will not be adding daytime serials. I take that as an outright no way will it be happening on Lifetime. It's not Business 101 to close off your options the way Lifetime did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, the only practical way to continue GL is to pull a Loving/The City thing. If a cable net is interested, TPTB should end the show in a big celebratory event, but then keep around several key characters and follow them. Of course, they'd pick all of the wrong characters, but it's worth a shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it's impossible for GL to find a way to survive. But I sincerely doubt it would produce five eppys/week. I could see it moving to cable and being an "arc" show like Army Wives. It would require changes in the cast. But I think the writing would improve if freed from pointless plots like coughanythingDAISYcough and given more leeway on cable.

The standards on cable are different. I just read an article where USA was thrilled to average 3 million viewers in primetime. (making them the most watched cable network and surpassing the CW). Given those realities, you'd think some network would covet those GL viewers and try to find some way.

The way tv is going, it'll be nothing but reruns and crappy reality shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wasn't trying to be flippant. I was just responding to the person who said it doesn't look like Lifetime is interested b/c of the response received from Sydney Plant. We know that PGP/Telenext has been in talks with Lifetime so I would like for people to keep up their efforts and not get discouraged because of that response.

The following is the exact response:

Thank you for your e-mail and your suggestion to Lifetime. We have no plans to add daytime serials to our programming line-up.

We hope you’ll enjoy our current schedule, which includes shows such as Reba, Desperate Housewives and Wife Swap.

Best regards,

Sydney Plant

Lifetime Networks

I e-mailed them and listed two shows that I currently watch on there, neither of which was listed in their response. No matter what you say, if it relates to GL, you get this response... listing the exact same three shows to watch on their schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Congratulations to Carlos Alcaraz on his second win at the French Open!

      Please register in order to view this content

        If the standard of play in the women's final yesterday wasn't of the highest caliber, that is not something you could say about today's final. It was absolutely fantastic tennis. 
    • When Barbara's letter was read (partly in Barbara's voice), there was commenting upthread that Barbara's voice is similar to the voice of Naomi's unhoused client June.  It did sound like her.  June is played by Jasmine Burke.  Per closing credits, Barbara was voiced by Sherita Bolden.  Still possible that they are connected. From our discussion on the May thread:  Looks and/or voices similar between June, Haley, and Tracy.   Tracy looks like Debbi Morgan. LOL so June might be connected to Haley, Tracy, or Barbara; and/or Samantha&Tyrell. I love that we don't know!
    • In the 1987 episodes, Mary has wonderful conversations with MJ and Cheryl. This is a realistic family with believable dynamics. Mary's ambivalence towards Vince is played nicely. Denise Alexander is so good here. I don't know what happened that the writers or producers just decided to chuck it all away. I don't FF these scenes. The show had a strong family that could have had years of storyline and they did nothing with them. I really don't get it. 
    • I can't speak for Sonni, but I thought Annie came off as neurotic from very early on. That's just how Cynthia Watros plays her parts, and the writing went along. I don't think Claire was mentally ill - they claimed she had a brain tumor, didn't they? I am never sure just why they made the effort given that she was leaving anyway. 
    • @DeeVee Claire is a perfect example. So many women came to Springfield as competent, smart, and talented professionals. Then they’d attract a so-called “good guy,” get dumped, and spiral into complete chaos. What always strikes me is how clearly it plays like a male fantasy—yet it was written and sold to a female audience.  I'm not a content expert, but I don't think cis gendered women fantasize about losing control of their mental faculties in response to an orgasm. Similar to Holly's story, it seems repulsive, because I don't believe women fantasize about becoming more vulnerable and appealing to men after they've been assaulted.
    • I just watched some parts of an episode of GL where Roger has just been shot by Holly. Rita then admits to Hillary that Roger raped her. Kasdorf is such a fantastic actress. I wish there were more of her work available. 
    • -- Alex Alegria has almost a full sleeve tattoo on one arm and a large tatt on one pec. I see no indication that the show is covering up his ink,
    • Didn't Carrie2 even seduce a minor? Ick. Oh, yeah, and she even tried to seduce Alan, but this was his post-prison era when he was trying to prove to everyone he had changed. It's funny that of all people he didn't go for it. Wait. Josh had an affair with Vanessa? Or she just thought he did? I know people always say "it's just a soap" but the way mental illness is portrayed on soaps (and that goes for pretty much all of them) has always been not great, especially PPD. They practically turned Claire into The Joker. She also was trying to seduce men. (I notice that now Mary Ryan Munisteri is listed as co HW with Ryder in the 1986 episodes, Claire has calmed down a lot. Never thought her GL career was very good but seems like she tried to course correct that a bit).
    • sss Ms. Tunie is a goddess. I feel all the anger, pride, sadness, arrogance, dignity, fear, love, and other emotions in everything she does as Anita.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy