OLTL: Who Is Rex's Dad? - OLTL is looking to cast a popular soap vet

Is Rex daddy suppose to be a new character or are they recasting someone we already know?

Wow. Everything on here feels like stuff we've known for about two weeks now.

And that Rex's dad spoiler - Man, I really don't have a good feeling about it. I'm getting a "rewrite" vibe from the whole thing - probably a few different times.

I think GL being canceled and not having more prominence could have been due to the timing of the announcement. SOD probably already had the cover and the magazine ready to go and only had time to have the blurb on the top instead of creating a whole new cover. I also wouldn't be surprised if there is only a paragraph or two about the cancellation in the magazine. I'm sure it will get more coverage in upcoming issues. Then again I could be wrong and GL got the shaft by SOD again.

Exactly. It just takes common sense to look at two possible reasons 1) they probably had to rush to put just that blurb on it and add something in the magazine for the week. 2) Money.

Seriously, alone gets my vote, but not to be in Pratt's world when there's so, so many available asswipes uhm I mean "good and strong" men. Sigh.

I know.... Kendall is a prime candidate for some alone time to find herself. This woman has bounced from man to man for YEARS.... and where has it got her? Have her focus on Fusion and her boys...

Yep, while trashing her room, Phyllis finds a lot of stolen goods.

Phyllis is losing it just as fast as Sharon is. I wouldn't be surprised if these two aren't sharing a padded cell by November sweeps

That's a good point, she does trash Sharon's room. It's a trash, find stolen loot, call the cops and run, I guess.

Yep... Phyllis will get out of dodge...... and be there to make sure Nick fully sees how much of a thief Sharon is.

Wow... This storyline is getting so good! LOL Pratt better be careful, because Y&R has my attention fully right now.... and I do have a busy life.. might have to drop a show........

I hope there is some evidence that she stole the books and left Eden holding the bag. Noah will hate her and she totally deserves his disgust. What a hypocrite.

Wow, GL gets canceled and still it doesn't get its own cover, but Steve and Kayla, who have been fired from DAYS for months now do.

I'm not even surprised anymore.

It is indeed ridiculous. Maybe they'll give them a cover for their last week in September.

I doubt it.

I doubt it.

I agree, only 3 soaps will ever get that cover, and you all know which ones.

I agree, only 3 soaps will ever get that cover, and you all know which ones.

Y&R, GH and Days. Am I right????? :P

Y&R, GH and Days. Am I right????? :P

the soaps that sell

I really don't think not having time was the issue.

It's not like they have new photoshoots for the cover every week now. They always use old photos and even screencaps. So they could have used an old photo of Zimmer or someone else and put it on the cover with a bigger headline...

Edited April 8, 200916 yr by Manny

I really don't think not having time was the issue.

It's not like they have new photoshoots for the cover every week now. They always use old photos and even screencaps. So they could have used an old photo of Zimmer or someone else and put it on the cover with a bigger headline...

Time was so not the issue, IMHO.

the fact that nobody watch's GL let alone would buy a magazine with it on the cover is the issue.

I dont blame them. Not at all.

Time was so not the issue, IMHO.

the fact that nobody watch's GL let alone would buy a magazine with it on the cover is the issue.

I dont blame them. Not at all.

Sure. That is the reason why USUALLY they don't put GL and others on the cover.

But I really do think a cancelation should have been on the cover.

Sure. That is the reason why USUALLY they don't put GL and others on the cover.

But I really do think a cancelation should have been on the cover.

But would you risk losing money if you ran a business? esp in this economy? I wouldnt have.

Besides the magz have been a joke for like a decade now.

I was rather shocked to see it get the newline at the top to be honest.

You know, I always agree that TV networks should cancel stuff with low ratings. It's business to them. And that's why I agree that magazines should put stuff on the cover that sell magazines.

But I guess I am just talking as a fan here and not thinking rationally