Members Dr Neil Curtis Posted April 7, 2009 Members Share Posted April 7, 2009 Is Rex daddy suppose to be a new character or are they recasting someone we already know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members brimike Posted April 7, 2009 Members Share Posted April 7, 2009 Wow. Everything on here feels like stuff we've known for about two weeks now. And that Rex's dad spoiler - Man, I really don't have a good feeling about it. I'm getting a "rewrite" vibe from the whole thing - probably a few different times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jcar03 Posted April 7, 2009 Members Share Posted April 7, 2009 Exactly. It just takes common sense to look at two possible reasons 1) they probably had to rush to put just that blurb on it and add something in the magazine for the week. 2) Money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Adam Posted April 8, 2009 Members Share Posted April 8, 2009 I know.... Kendall is a prime candidate for some alone time to find herself. This woman has bounced from man to man for YEARS.... and where has it got her? Have her focus on Fusion and her boys... Phyllis is losing it just as fast as Sharon is. I wouldn't be surprised if these two aren't sharing a padded cell by November sweeps Yep... Phyllis will get out of dodge...... and be there to make sure Nick fully sees how much of a thief Sharon is. Wow... This storyline is getting so good! LOL Pratt better be careful, because Y&R has my attention fully right now.... and I do have a busy life.. might have to drop a show........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BadZoe Posted April 8, 2009 Members Share Posted April 8, 2009 I hope there is some evidence that she stole the books and left Eden holding the bag. Noah will hate her and she totally deserves his disgust. What a hypocrite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members CSF Posted April 8, 2009 Members Share Posted April 8, 2009 I'm not even surprised anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members CSF Posted April 8, 2009 Members Share Posted April 8, 2009 I doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted April 8, 2009 Members Share Posted April 8, 2009 I agree, only 3 soaps will ever get that cover, and you all know which ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members CSF Posted April 8, 2009 Members Share Posted April 8, 2009 Y&R, GH and Days. Am I right????? :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JackPeyton Posted April 8, 2009 Members Share Posted April 8, 2009 the soaps that sell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Manny Posted April 8, 2009 Members Share Posted April 8, 2009 I really don't think not having time was the issue. It's not like they have new photoshoots for the cover every week now. They always use old photos and even screencaps. So they could have used an old photo of Zimmer or someone else and put it on the cover with a bigger headline... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JackPeyton Posted April 8, 2009 Members Share Posted April 8, 2009 Time was so not the issue, IMHO. the fact that nobody watch's GL let alone would buy a magazine with it on the cover is the issue. I dont blame them. Not at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Manny Posted April 8, 2009 Members Share Posted April 8, 2009 Sure. That is the reason why USUALLY they don't put GL and others on the cover. But I really do think a cancelation should have been on the cover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JackPeyton Posted April 8, 2009 Members Share Posted April 8, 2009 But would you risk losing money if you ran a business? esp in this economy? I wouldnt have. Besides the magz have been a joke for like a decade now. I was rather shocked to see it get the newline at the top to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Manny Posted April 8, 2009 Members Share Posted April 8, 2009 You know, I always agree that TV networks should cancel stuff with low ratings. It's business to them. And that's why I agree that magazines should put stuff on the cover that sell magazines. But I guess I am just talking as a fan here and not thinking rationally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.