Jump to content

CBS: More Cuts To Come?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

In case of ATWT and GL with the yearly renewals this could happen.

B&B and Y&R have longterm deals with the network - with B&B up next (?) year and in store for a serious slashing, I assume, considering current ratings - which CBS of course could try to renegotiate but the Bells are in a more comfy position since it's much harder to find a replacement for a 5 day programme than a primetime series you can replace with a special 60 Minutes or so...

That said; both Bell productions have trimmed their behind the scenes staff in recent months. They did cut all freelancers in sound/camera/editing and even the contracted staff has been slightly cut back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't noticed too many changes in the credits with regard to the camera/sound/editing people at B&B? Am I missing something?

That might have been because of the limited work schedule leading up to their Christmas hiatus and/or that week they had the shortened episodes for the NCAA Tourney. Either that, or maybe Y&R/B&B refuses to credit them and, instead, chooses to credit others that they deem more important to the process(i.e. the recent additions to the credits that include the international marketing and distribution team). But as I've said, I might be missing something.

I can't even imagine what would happen if B&B's budget is further slashed. I mean, they would learn how to survive and deal and look flawless per usual, but I just don't want to even think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You have a show that is widely regarded (if not by you) as the best on daytime. Best writing, best acting, best casting, best production values.

And you want to tamper with it??

Okay, um, why?

You seem to be responding to the efficiencies of the system, without regard to the outcomes. Y&R rocks, and yes that is a fanboy speaking. Maria can have 47 writers if she wishes, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know that whole story of how Julius Caesar once said he'd rather be first in a village than second in Rome? That's what's happening here. Y&R is the best because all the others — suck. (Another problem is that people aren't really offering a 32nd chance to win them over to their shows...) And this is nothing new. Consistency is what made Y&R stay at the top. Not so much the beauty of its stories.

System would be even more efficient if those writers weren't so different among themselves. But that's not the only thing that's not working out: GH people are different, yet as a team — they're great. Y&R does not have a team, it has executioners, people who do stuff for money. (God, that sounded dumb... :rolleyes: But I hope you'll get the point.)

Furthermore, someone has to pay those 47 writers. Meaning — less money for Jess Walton. Or whomever else...

Big teams don't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Let me explain this further, I cannot resist. :DY&R is not the best soap on a planetary basis nor is it the best soap there ever was nor is this the best Y&R has ever been (Rome). It's the best in a little "village" called US daytime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with that. Didn't people criticize LML for having way too many writers on staff? I think the most a soap should have is 8, and I'm being generous. Five should be enough for an hour long program, and that would give you very good consistency. There have been times where I've seen 10-13 credited on ATWT, GL, OLTL in the late 90s, and that was no help to them. I think Y&R has enough writers right now who can spit out another soap. They have like 2 writing teams on staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why would an hourlong show only need five writers? Would said show eliminate the breakdown position and would the headwriter(who, in more cases than not, has an ego anyway) write a script for an episode, on his/her own instructions, rather than having a breakdown writer map the path for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy