Jump to content

B&B: Who Would You Cut From The Cast?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Honestly, i wouldnt mind at all if B&B started to take the focus off everyone and bring in a slew of new people. Some people of diff race, and sexuality. B&B cant do this as it is becauser the focus is around brooke & Ridge & The Forresters & thats it.

Sure people whould complain, and some people would stop watching. but if done correctly it could work, IMHO, esp if you use someone as an anchor. Say Brooke. have Brooke go out and start her own line all on her own. They could the focus on her employees and her new life if you will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'd cut Nick. Keep Jackie around and make Nick's departure/death somehow connected to Stephanie to give Jackie a motive to come on strong with the fashion house.

I'd also cut either Donna or Katie. I think having one of Brooke's sisters is fine, but we don't need both of them. I wouldn't know which to pick, I like Heather Tom but Katie has been torn to pieces. I'm not that big of a fan of Jennifer Gaeris (sp) but Donna has been more interesting to me than Katie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jack Wagner, Heather Tom, Jennifer Garcias, Texas Battle, Brandon Beemer. I would love to reestablish the Forrester Family with Maggie and Jessica and maybe a sister for Eric played by Morgan Fairchild. I would married off Ridge and Taylor and send them to Forrester's overseas somewhere. Reestablish Spectra with Joan Collins as Sally's cousin or sister to Jackie. bring back CJ and Clarke's other son with Margo. Recast the Logan sisters with the original actors so the can be the right age and not the same age as Bridget and Rick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B has this way of killing potential in actors. Lesli Kaye, Leslie Anne Down, Heather Tom... they all came on to rave reviews. All of them have been close to the chopping block and received reprieves. It is clear that viewers want to see these actors more, but they just languish. Kudos to Bell for recognizing their talents and keeping them on contract, but what waste of legitimate talent.

I agree with those who say that Jack Wagner has passed his prime on B&B. He is a strong actor, but does not seem to share chemistry with any actress. His love stories are all duds. Also, he lacks the glamour of the other characters. Every other actor has something exotic about their look: Moss's square jaw, Gaeris' cheak bones, etc etc... Not that his looks matter but for B&B a soap about glamour and the over the top lifestyle of LA's westside, Wagner seems out of place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nick Marrone. From sailer to fashion, from Brooke to Bridget, Taylor, Felicia, Katie. The Marrones (and the Ramirez family) were Brad Bell's attempt to do the same thing his father did with Y&R in the early eighties, but it didn't work out. The fact that Nick is related to so many people for no reason at all doesn't help things.

Same goes for Jackie, unless she marries Eric.

The logical thing would be for Ridge and Taylor to become the new Eric and Stephanie of the show, but with RM's acting skills it's impossible. Recast Ridge with a real actor or have them remarry and leave for Europe.

Saint Katie OUT

Rick and Bridget OUT

Recast Thomas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Taylor

Ridge

Katie

Donna

Steffy

I'd keep Nick, but have him be the sailor Nick, not the businessman Nick. He was much more likable then. I almost said Rick, because Bell has ruined him like he does most characters, but I like KL and think he could bring something if written better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy