Jump to content

OLTL Ups the Dramatic Stakes, But Do They Dare Fire Slezak?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

IMO OLTL right now has lost it spark but I have faith RC can bring that spark back. Every HW goes thorugh this process but I agree with most of you guys.

Alderson (Starr) is overrated. She sucks. From her annoying voice to her over the top crying...:rolleyes:

I love Farah Faith and I was glad when he was giving a SL for Gigi. I also want to see Erika featured more. The woman has won 6 Emmys! SHE IS OLTL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Sorry, jinx, I see what you were saying. You're right, they've had the kids in danger stories on Agnes shows. I think beyond that point, what some may find distasteful is that these stories seem like they're all about plot device and sensationalism. Cole's drug addiction happened at the speed of light. So did the relationship between Starr and Schuyler.

Why can't these stories be told in a more leisurely manner, with less focus on these big shock value moments? I think that's what makes OLTL so difficult to process sometimes, because they never take the time to both build a story and explore the consequences of a story. Either things dawdle for months or years and then suddenly end, or things happen out of nowhere. It's frustrating because some of OLTL is so well written and so beautifully acted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They're on cable, at shows like Damages, Leverage, Dexter and True Blood. Those are the new soaps.

As for Slezak, if this rumor comes to pass, it will freak out the online audience but the offliners won't realize she's actually gone for a while. Besides they can pay four newbies with her salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well frankly, I don't want the soaps to revert back to the socially conscious stories right now - not until they work on cleaning up some of the stuff that is wrong with soaps.

It is not that they can't do them justice because they could if they tried, but my question is how in the hell can you take it seriously when you have a serious socially relevant story in the midst of a return from the dead or some outlandish [!@#$%^&*] that can't ever happen.

Back when Agnes Nixon and others sought to raise the standards of soaps by rising them above the common dribble that inhabited soaps and tried to give them a conscious and respectability those stories worked. But they don't now. Soaps have no respect for themselves anymore so how in the world can they even try.

What amazes me is the cry for better stories and dealing with the fallout in a proper way but yet those same fans will cry for Dixie's death to be undone on AMC or any number of things.

It just doesn't make sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am of the opinion that soaps should not do socially conscious stories at all. TPTB and the audience have the attention spans of gnats. There is no tolerance for stories to play out in a meaningful or realistic way because everyone gets bored. Perhaps it is because these topics are covered by Oprah so we have heard it all before.

Dexter is my favorite television show, but it is the acting along with the writing that make it fascinating to watch. Michael C. Hall is a talent. I don't hold it against soaps for having some bad actors. It is hard to have a cast chock full of very talented people, but TPTB can do better in the casting dept. and they can use their cast more wisely when telling stories.

About Slezak, I want to believe that it is all rumor and that she is safe, but who saw the Martha Bryne and Don Diamont firing coming? More likely ABC will continue to phase out Vicki to avoid the uproar of that firing Slezak would cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hard to believe, but I was about to rise to your defense. :P I recall that you were raving about the show when characters and performers you really admired and enjoyed were being featured.

I'm really not a Viki fan (much prefer Dorian) but when I hear the title of the show ONE LIFE TO LIVE, I think Viki is the "ONE" life. Unfortunately the show no longer treats Viki as it's center where other stories are an outgrowth of that center, and unless it does, I don't think it matters if she's on the show or not. Right now, her family is rarely featured. The reason I've watched the show for all these years is primarily because of the Buchanans, Lords and Cramers. Kevin's gone. Joey's gone. Jessica and Natalie are featured minimally in a second (or third) tier story. Cassie's gone. Kelly's gone. Adriana is gone. The remaining Cramer's all have stories but they're fractured and not connected with each other. Although, I think these stories are well written and capably performed, I'm not terribly entertained because I'm just not very interested in the Morascos, Thornhearts, McBain, or Montez's.

I hope it's cyclical, not strategic. I hope it's not a deliberate attempt to phase out the core families I've become invested in over the years. It wouldn't be the first time. The Buchanan's didn't start out as a core family. There are no Wolek's anymore. The show survived. But Viki was always the anchor and in some way the other characters tied back to her. No more. They need to change the name of the show. The Many Lives of Llanview or something. It's not the show I've been watching for so long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually she stated that while this was done in the past, the fact that doing two of these storylines at the same time is something new and that doing these types of storylines with no balance of anything lighter and or romantic maybe a turn off for some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You see I don't think RC writes for the actors per se, he writes for the characters, which what I think writers should do.

A prime example of this is the character of Alexandra Spaulding on Guiding Light and how differently they've written that character with each of their portrayers.

I don't think the stories are all that bad either, just the execution and yes the weakness of the actors carrying the stories. I'm sure if we had some strong actors in the whole Rex/Stacy/Gigi mess, alot more people would be enjoying the story than they are now with FF and CH. (I'm on the fence with JPL)

I don't want to believe that Viki is leaving OLTL. I truly don't believe RC would be a major fan of that (just as he wasn't of Tina's sudden exit), but then again we do have Frons and Valentini at the helm so with them who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Where daytime comes into play is viewers have a more strong reaction to a social issue when it happens to someone they feel like they know.

Like when Courtney on ATWT had bulimia. There wasn't a storyline where suddenly she started purging and then the next thing you know, she's in the hospital and the story is done. Her feelings of insecurity were slowly built up over a year and she began binging and purging.

The teens on OLTL are involved in such constant melodrama, they aren't relateable, they become a joke. The pacing of the stories lets the show down over and over. I feel like some of the stories, such as the aftermath of the Tarty sex and the motivations and pacing for the David/Buchanan storylines, are almost textbook examples of how not to pace a storyline.

I don't care if OLTL tells social issue stories, I just want them to learn how to tell a story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love socially conscious stories but I don't think all soaps should do them. What I really wish is that the genre was healthy enough to support a variety of soaps. I wish there could be shows for those who like camp, topical drama, supernatural, teen drama, etc... There should be shows for Carlivatians, Malonians, Nixonians and Bellians. Unfortunately, one of the sad things about soaps is that they're all the same and all equally played out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree 5000% will all of this regarding OLTL.

As for YR, I think I kind of admire the suits for giving their long time (many, much older) audience members something entertaining. This story won't go on forever, and I don't enjoy it, but I don't mind it.

ANDREA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Marlena,

As always I appreciate your take on things, even as I respectfully disagree on a few points.

I don't think that the idea of someone living with a disability is nearly as hopeless or tragic as anyone, let alone a child, facing the possibility of dying from a terminal illness. That said, paralysis stories on soaps are usually bigger downers than terminal illness stories for me, because typically characters who are dying suddenly have big epiphanies about things that they (and usually all of their loved ones, who line up for deathbed advice) should have done years ago. Whereas characters faced with being paralyzed/blind/deaf typically act even dumber than they did previously, pushing away the people who love them because they think they are unlovable and a burden because of their disabilities. I'm actually surprised that

On another note, I personally would not put David and Dorian's infamous oral sex scene in the same category as any of the antics of this mind-boggling Stacey character. I read your initial reaction to the blow job scene and ultimately I disagreed, but I did not respond at the time because it seemed to me like such a throwaway scene that it wasn't worth arguing its merits with anyone. But it seems like you're still angry about it, so I am going to put my two cents in, not that I expect to change your mind but hear me out: I think a woman (let alone a woman of Dorian's age) being shown to have a pleasurable and empowering sex life with a gorgeous man she has been involved with and cared for (on and off) for almost fifteen years is a positive (and all too rare) thing on soaps these days. And yes, she was using sex to manipulate David, in part, but I think a lot of people use sex to manipulate their partner, at one time or another, to varying degrees. Dorian's motives in doing so with David were clearly established, rooted in a lot of on-screen history with him and with the Buchanans, and ultimately very human. Also I believe Robin Strasser, who has been playing Dorian since before I was born, has said in print that it was actually her idea. I'll trust her judgment.

Whereas I don't know what Stacey's motivation is, and what is more I don't care, and I doubt the actress knows or cares either. And the fact that we are being introduced to Stacey (ad nauseum) through this aspect of her personality makes it all very ugly to me. I would gladly take Dorian and David in a risque love scene any day. That said, I can't imagine that anyone directly involved in any aspect of putting this show out on a day-to-day basis actually relishes bringing Stacey to life for us. It's pretty clear to me that her instant frontburner status has been dictated by someone very far removed from the writing/production (and probably from reality). Was the actress so popular on GL to merit this fanfare? Did she even leave of her own volition after a full contract, or was she replaced with the acclaimed actress who has been playing Lizzie for years? I have not watched GL regularly in over a decade but I don't remember her lasting very long…

Finally, while I bet the highers up at ABC would sadly be all too happy

All of that notwithstanding…I can't say I'm watching regularly these days. I did see Friday's show, and a stabbing and a two-car crash was too much. It's clearly desperation. And despite what I said about the differences that I see between disabilities and terminal illness,

But a part of me hopes this breakneck pace works and that the 12-17 year olds they are targeting tune in. There are still more moments on this show that I like than on any other soap on the air these days, so the rumors that Carlivati is in the line of fire do not sit well with me. I don't think anybody is going to be able to do any better in the current climate at ABC, but I firmly believe a writer who doesn't care can and will do a lot more damage. In a few weeks, if I can tune into OLTL and see the characters I love doing interesting things, then I'm happy to just not watch Stacey and the serial killer and whatever else is happening in the mean time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Yeah, right, they've got Cam playing Love2Hate Drew in extremis & they're not gonna play that hand out?!!!  I figure they use the prison beat-down for a redemptive phase but only when they think they've wrung every possible drop out of this absolutely odious every day villain they've created!
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Respectfully agree to disagree. We had 4 episodes with original flashbacks integrated well into contemporary scenes that were sweet, romantic, that resonated, that hit all the possible nostalgic chords & that shows me the writing team not only cares for these 2 characters but that they were really excited about writing for them. And, we also have the quote from Korte/VanEtten beginning of the year-ish that they considered Lucky & Liz a foundational couple for the canvas.  I thought Lucky's saying he didn't think he'd stay once she turned down his marriage proposal to be good character motivation. I also thought the idea of some summer travels with Aiden supports character integrity.  Going by his exit interviews, what's left is people & logistics/scheduling, etc. & there's no way a writing team can anticipate an actor taking an out in their contract ahead of time. They have to deal with it, in the moment, when it comes up & likely it's going to make a bit of a mess to whatever they have sketched out in the long story thrust. 
    • I had a driver taking me to Infusion the other day & we were talking about soaps. She was out of touch but had been a CBS fan, from TPIR, all day till Oprah. Telling her about BTG. What network? CBS. When: 2pm. Is it between ATWT & GL? Oh, girl, you are so behind. So, she was appalled when I briefly brought her up to date BUT she remained interested in hearing more about BTG, so that was a plus.  Last weekend I got a haircut so it is the way I like it, short & spiky but of course it's purple. Recently, I was waiting for my ride outside the Infusion Center & a woman comes up to me, about my age, short spiky hair but all white. She raves about my purple hair & says she is a pancreatic cancer survivor & purple is that color (which I knew) and she is thinking going purple but doesn't know where to start. So I tell her about Splat, no bleach req'd, easy, etc. & she's getting excited & my driver pulled up, & stuck her head out & said, Donna? & she had purple hair, too! I felt like we were in a purple vortex. It was both lovely & surreal.      
    • We saw Hope, with Bo, where she revealed John's death to him & he immediately wanted to leave for Salem & we saw the two of them talk to a doc or an admin about whether he would be allowed to be discharged yet.  Someone, maybe Will, talked to Sami on the phone and at the airport Sydney had taken a fall, sounded like she was on a moving sidewalk, and had at least 2 breaks & was scheduled for some kind of orthopedic surgery.  Since it is clear that Sweeney cannot or will not be available, again I say  it is time to recast.  Wasn't Carrie lock-step with Belle the whole time? In general I thought all of the eulogies were both good & appropriate. Yes, Paul touched me like no other. Loved Abe. I still miss previous Little Rachel but for the first time new Little Rachel also moved me. And, amazingly, I am caught up again. Whoopeee!  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • In true TV tradition Dani kept her bra on during sex. Couldn't we have been treated to Andre in his underwear , rather than trousers on already? I took Hayley's reaction as teasing. Surely she wouldn't think for a moment Bill was fooling around with Ashley? I agree that Dupree staircase looks a little basic.Wish for something grander. And in the living room there was a lamp in front of the door. Huh? Is that a closet? Would you have built in storage in a living room in a house of that size? Chelsea has millions of followers?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16N2KPYDxR/ During the livestream tribute to #DrakeHogestyn we discussed the taping of #JohnBlack funeral scenes on Days of our Lives beautifully stated by his TV children Eric Martsolf Martha Madison
    • 1976 Pt 2 A young woman named Tina calls Norman’s hospital room, claiming she’s in town and is broke and upset about his condition. He firmly tells her to stay away, but she sneaks into his room later, upsetting him. He tells her she’s ruining his plan, but she can’t see why— after all, he’s told her he loves her, and they will soon be married. Norman becomes irate and starts yelling, claiming all his problems are because of Sandy. Meanwhile, Bob, who had left the floor station for Norman’s room, discovered he’d forgotten his stethoscope and returned to his office for it. Nurses passing Norman’s room heard loud shouting from within but assumed everything was under control, as Dr. Hughes was in there. When Bob finally returns, he finds Norman alone. Tina has slipped out, and Norman has had another heart attack. All emergency methods fail, and Norman dies. Bob takes it hard; he was his doctor and couldn’t save him. John Dixon, long resentful and bitter at Bob’s successes in his career, subtly manages to force a hearing into Norman’s death. The floor nurses report that Bob went to Norman’s room and an argument followed; then Bob called for help when Norman went into heart failure. Bob’s report is contradictory that he went for his stethoscope and found Garrison already stricken. Bob, assuming that this is only a routine death, has already left on a short vacation, untroubled and unsuspecting, so his written report must stand. He returns to find that the situation has escalated into a full-fledged investigation. Learning that the argument is the bone. of contention, Sandy comes forward and claims that she was in Norman’s room, arguing with him. Bob refuses to let her perjure herself, which John manages to use as credence in Norman’s contention that Bob and Sandy were having an affair. ‘Bob is angry when, after a week, the hospital board hands him an official reprimand; thinking this is virtually an accusation of guilt, Bob refuses to accept it. His first reaction is his resignation, but upon thinking it through, he decides he’s going to fight this. He withdraws his hasty resignation and begins to work with Tom to reconstruct the events of the day Norman died. Nurse Connolly finally admits that someone could have entered Norman’s room unseen, but Floor Nurse Holland is firmly convinced no one did. Carol Stallings is upset to learn that the business tactics of her husband, Jay, while legal, are not as ethical and moral as she would have hoped. Chris Hughes has asked Tom to take over Jay’s legal affairs for the firm. Tom decides the opportunity is too good to refuse, even though he personally doesn’t like Jay - and knows Jay resents him, as he and Carol were at. one time married. Tom soon finds that some of Jay’s proposed new dealings are somewhat illegal, in the gray area, and tells him he advises against them. It is a  lawyer’s function to protect clients from making this kind of mistake, he explains. Kim Dixon has recovered physically from the injuries she sustained when she was hit on the head during a tornado, but her amnesia continues. She has been told that she was about to divorce John and marry Dan, but cannot seem to feel any emotions toward Dan now. In fact, she has noticed that most of the people around her seem to dislike John, and she is therefore feeling sympathetic toward him. John manages to usé Kim’s uncertainty to widen the gap between her and Dan, and finally convinces Kim to let him move back home. Dan is very badly hurt upon learning of this. Kim explains to Bob that she feels uncomfortable with Dan—she senses that he expects more of her than she can deal with now—while John has been thoughtful and understanding of her. Susan Stewart, Dan’s ex-wife, has stopped drinking, and tries to help Dan through this painful time by taking the holiday season responsibilities for Emily and Betsy upon herself to relieve Dan of the burden. (Emily is Dan and Susan’s daughter; Betsy believes she is Dan’s orphaned niece but is in reality his daughter by the late Elizabeth Stewart.) Dan’s misery at Kim’s apparent rejection has finally  convinced him to accept a medical-mission assignment in Bolivia. Kim, meanwhile, has been having momentary flashes of memory, but none are long enough so that she can understand what she’s remembering. On the night Dan is leaving for Bolivia, however, she has a coherent recollection and remembers the letter she wrote to Dan saying she wanted to be with him for the rest of their lives. Learning that he is leaving immediately, Kim leaves three messages on his answering machine. But Susan, who still wants Dan back, overhears Kim on the phone and goes to Dan’s office, where she removes the tape. Susan later tells Kim that Dan got the messages but they weren’t important enough to handle before leaving for South America. Susan then suggests to Kim that she gracefully end it by writing to Dan saying it’s all over, and to press Kim further shé suggests that Kim has been ungrateful to John for the constant care and concern he’s shows her during the past weeks. I believe the Dan going to Bolivia story was when John Reilly left. When Dan returned, it was again John Colenback. So the Kim/Dan story had been initiated with Reilly/Hays.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy