Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Impeachment would be a waste of time and would bring the Senate to screeching halt. It's more important to kept getting these other Biden judges confirmed. There's no way to "fix" SCOTUS. There just isn't. It took decades of corruption and manipulation to get to this point. The focus should be on November. That's it. Impeachment would be a self-inflicted wound.

Edited by marceline
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3458

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

May 19, 2024:  Biden gives the commencement speech at Morehouse College.(men's historically Black college/university)
He talks about racism, about a two-state solution for Palestine, and about hope.  Worth watching the whole speech.
Transcript here:
https://www.c-span.org/video/transcript/?id=60321

(at one point he says "I've been vice president to the first Black president and become my close friend and president to the first woman vice president.  Wh- - I have no doubt that a Morehouse man will be president one day, just after an AKA from Howard. (referring to Kamala Harris being part of the AKA sorority at Howard University).
 

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree.  At one point, the interest rates on my graduate loans were TWICE that of a mortgage on a new house.  That should not be a reality in any country, let alone this one.

I'm not someone who believes all student debt should be wiped out.  If you take out a loan, I believe, you have to do your best to repay it.  But I do think something needs to be done about lowering interest rates so that college graduates and others aren't stuck paying off loans into their so-called "twilight years."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, in principle, one should take out a loan in good faith that repayments will be made but the student loan system hasn’t been working in good faith for the last 30 years. I can remember being told by financial aid and registrars offices that student loan debt was “good debt”. Oh really…how sway?

Please register in order to view this content

 The terms of “good debt” shouldn’t function in a way that is as or more ruthless than loan sharks do. When I read this article, I thought back to how hard it was for low-income students to graduate on time. Not for academic reasons but financial. I was able to graduate on time for undergrad but for graduate school, I had to take time off for financial reasons only to discover that the  it elite university I attended lost (yes, I said LOST) my scholarship! That made me graduate late into a less than ideal economy. 
I also thought about the fact that in undergrad, the school actually allowed credit card companies to come on campus and set up tables trying to sign up students for credit cards.  So you take a situation where you have students, most of whom have had little to no financial education, some of whom are low-income, some who are the first in their families to go to college and luring them in with freebies. Most of us were not profligate spenders but if you have vulnerable students who have work study jobs that only pay the bottom of the wage scale needing books  you’re setting most up for financial pressures. Honestly, I don’t really care if these folks see a dime. Any time I get mail seeking alumni contributions, guess where I put that letter?

If anyone is really interested in actually fixing the problem, they may want to pay more attention to the obscenely high tuition fees and how much of that goes to university presidents and professors who are hardly on campus and leave their adjuncts to do all the work. I once had a professor, the head of my department (in a rotating chair of the department position) give me the number to contact him at his summer home if I needed to contact him (a second home, as it turned out, the school was helping to pay mortgage on). 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recent Posts

    • Terrific ideas -- but would Mike and Nancy's great-grandson bear the last name Dallas?  Yuck.  Any way we could make him a Karr?    And in a similar vein, how could Bill and Martha's granddaughter bear the name Marceau?   I love the idea of continuing the Karr, Marceau, Hillyer, and Drake legacies, but if the new characters do not use the familiar last names, the effort to connect them to the past is rather fruitless.  Just my personal observation.   
    • And they gave him a whole commercial and everything! Happy to see that star keeps growing.
    • But the REAL question...   ...May Sweeps...OR SLEEPS...???

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It's doubly a shame because one thing Long excelled at was using backstory to enhance the present story. I think that's one reason why Josh and Reva took off the way they did--the early stuff is really good. (Unfortunately, they ruined it by overusing the characters). Imagine if Roger returned to get involved with Alex, and her brother and ex, who used to be dire enemies, came together to oppose him. Instead, Mike was nowhere to be seen and Alan was written out for years. Yes, casting would have been an issue, but when you think about what they wound up with for 15 years...  
    • I've never been so annoyed to be running late. lol   EVERYONE looks so pretty.   Happy to see Andre and Eva interacting, Mona being there, and happy to see Nicole play matchmaker for Dani. Fingers crossed that FOINE doctor from Nicole's last event pops up.   @kalbir Andre looking like a snack in that tux.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Lmao!!!! 
    • Also gotta feel sorry for Mona, realizing today that she’s only known Leslie for a few months; she’s going to blame herself for all of this.
    • The way this show handled Nikolas' shooting Hayden, Austin's murder, the long slow delay to getting rid of Cyrus, etc. we're likely to have it revealed in a year when Nina is 3 weeks away from leaving and has had minimal airtime.
    • Interesting. I love my Roku.  No, I don't know. Who? I mean Disney def does. I would think a number of parties have stocks.
    • Is he still spamming demands that they hire the campy chick from The Haves and Have Nots? Or whichever show it was. I don't think it's an either/or. I happen to think Dana, Dani, Eva, Nicole, Kat, etc. are all great. Certain folks aren't going to be some posters' favorites and that's fair enough. But I would argue most of those characters above (and several others) have caught on with a lot of the online audience. I've even warmed up to Martin!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy