Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3459

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

I've heard people mention Mike Espy in the Mississippi Senate race. I've also heard some talk about the Alaska Senate race but I can't say. 

 

State legislative races can sometimes be most important in the long run. For instance, here's one for Michigan. (not asking you to donate to them, just giving as a reference)

 

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/bluewavemi2020

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

McConnell played Trump on this issue, as another relief bill is something he likely never wanted to do. He goaded Trump into a big meltdown canning any relief, and now we are in "no takesies backsies" mode. He knows many are stupid enough to blame Biden for this if he is elected, and he knows he has enough money and vote rigging to have a good chance of keeping the Senate in GOP hands, especially with vulnerable senators like Thom Tillis now using the "we need to be a check on a Biden administration" card that  senators successfully used in 2016. The cruelest continue to skate and the rest of us will just continue to suffer. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

North Carolina and South Carolina Senate races are getting the most media attention. Iowa is starting to as well with the Democrat pulling ahead in the polling. 

 

Three others that are flying under the radar and the media are ignoring, but I would keep an eye on are Alaska, Montana, and Kansas senate races. They've all had a couple of polls come out in recent weeks after months of no polling. The Democrat (or independent in the case of the Alaska challenger) are all either polling ahead or slightly behind. I think there is a decent possibility that at least 1 surprises the media and goes Democrat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am just curious. How exactly does any of this help these senators. This isn't 2016 and we are in the midst of a pandemic and people are hurting. I mean I get why McConnell has been pushing it aside - GOP donors don't want it unless it has that liability clause. So I get why McConnell has been unwilling to bring anything up for a vote because he thinks the donations for vulnerable senate races will dry up but they are already in the red in terms of campaign funding and frankly I don't see at the end of the day how not voting on or passing a relief package helps any of them at the voting booth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

McConnell does not want to pass anything with the help of Democrats as he would look weak and set a bad precedent for himself, and a majority of Republicans in the Senate are too hardline to pass more relief than the very slimmed-down, meaningless aid they passed not long ago. And, as you mention, the liability clause. The vulnerable senators are basically SOL, with McConnell just pushing the blame onto Pelosi (or Trump) and playing the "we need checks on a Biden White House" card to help him keep the Senate. Sadly, there's a very strong chance this could work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
    • Brandon Tartikoff saved NBC primetime. Brandon Stoddard got ABC Tuesday to rebound and put an end to the Aaron Spelling hit factory.
    • Awwwww Brad. I know I shouldn't, but I feel bad for him 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And yeah, agreed that Dante having animosity towards Gio is very forced and contrived. And it also has me concerned that it means the reveal won't be happening anytime soon.
    • God, I love that woman. Another amazing interview!!
    • We can only guestimate based on other characters. Chelsea was said to be 23 in the first episodee and based on Marttin wanting to run for President in the next election, he's about 30/31. Eva and and Kat are somewhere between that  so Id say closer to 25 or 26
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy