Jump to content

November 17-21, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I both agree and disagree with this. Because I am contrary like that. :D

Writers cannot write happy couples, because they are boring. Agreed. That doesn't mean they can't write couples who are deeply in love with one another and committed, but have angst and conflict. It's more challenging to keep them together and find other ways to create that drama, but if any part of soap story-telling were easy, we would love all the soaps and everybody would be watching them. It's harder to write long term couples. The easy solution to shake things up and keep things interesting is introduce an interloper that tears them apart, and then tell the long road to finding their way back together again. But as TnB and Josh and Reva, and many many others have proven -- that gets boring and predictable too. Mac and Rachel Corey are an example of one couple that I think was done very well for many years.

And certainly you can't keep every couple (or perhaps any couple) together permanently, if for no other reason than at some point personnel issues get in the way. If Thorsten Kaye leaves AMC, should we kill off Kendall too, or keep her on the show and reduce her role to that of mother, best friend and daughter? Fans are mad that Cady McClain was let go, but should Tad Martin be written out? As a fan of the characters more than of the performers, I agree that characters shouldn't be confined to a "pairing" just because fans of that pairing won't accept something different. TPTB shouldn't cave in to those demands. But the other side of that coin, and a glaring problem with OLTL and ABC soaps in general is that they have almost NO couples that represent that minority that realistically exists irl, that is together and in a committed relationship and are not in danger of breaking up. If realism is what you think they should be going for, they shouldn't ignore that bit of reality either.

I've always said that fans who want their faves to fall in love, get married, have babies and live happily ever after are really looking for a fairy tale, not a soap opera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You just reminded me of why I hate fan wars!!! But I also think it has to do with the unclear vision these shows have period. They seem more interested in getting couples on the top 10 couples in SOD, than presenting clear characters that we can grow with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Who hasn't? it isn't until you re-watch the videos and realize the network has been making fools out of all involved, that you bury it in the sand.

Looking at what's happened in the last year- I can only think of a few stories that have been told in completion. How is one suppose to invest in anything happening when the majority of longterm stories are dropped midway. (I'm not counting the stories that take place over a couple of weeks.) Although I'm no longer a fan- I can imagine that's why OLTL does deserve kudos for completing much of what they've started- whether or not they're good could be argued. Young and the Restless is doing a much better job with that as of late, as they have the cast, history, characters to make all things worthwhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another problem with soaps is they've driven away what was the bulk of their core audience for YEARS: Women.

You don't write a storyline like Marty begging her gang rapist to screw her, and not expect to drive away viewers, especially female viewers. It's stuff like is why soaps will NEVER evolve, especially when you get RC acting surprised that people would be offended :rolleyes:

Sure I know times have changed and alot of men watch too

Not feeling the Pratt love either, IMO he's very overrated, so far the ONLY thing he seems to have done right is how he's writing Erica & Adam. The Annie storyline had potential but fell flat when it was reduced to her going crazy cause Ryan didnt wub her anymore. Of course it's about Ryan, another big problem with AMC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The regular viewer cares about Luke. He comes from an established family in Oakdale. I doubt the regulary viewer would give two [!@#$%^&*] about what happens to Noah. If Luke found someone knew who made him happy the regular viewer would be all for it.

As you say it's that fanbase that would be pissed. I hope LUke loses his virginity to anyone besides Noah. Of course it must be a male. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I even think...if written PROPERLY (which it won't be)...Luke COULD lose his virginity to Brian.

I realize that is stretching things, and I'm not advocating for this. But I want to agree with you. The rooting value is with Luke. As long as Luke is loved and cared for...that's really all we care about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As I have said over and over again this is NOT THE FIRST TIME that women viewers have been offended at something seen on a soap opera. Women have been offended often throughout the years. In fact both men and women viewers have been offended.

I will say that there is a totally different generation of viewers who watch today and that is where the difference is. I guess you could say the former viewers would have to be more open minded. Even with illegal abortions and mixed race stories that were highly offensive to the times those viewers did not give up - they gave the shows another chance. Both the Pat Matthews abortion and the Carla Bernudi black/white romance came within the very first year of the soaps AW and OLTL and both soaps survived for many years after offending a large portion of their small audiences.

Again it goes back to the new generation where as I have talked about here we get mad over firings and threaten or do leave; we get mad over our favorite couple not being together; we get offended over a story and leave.

I am not saying that anyone should suspend their beliefs over anything and stick with a show if it totally offends you. All I am saying is we need to give things a chance. That is something we just do not do often enough anymore.

I get so amazed right now in so many of the discussions about Days the discussion is so often not about what can be done to help Days but who is the most important cast member to the show. And in the end it is not going to amount to a hill of beans who was most important to the show.

If fans do not band together and try to come up with what is best for the shows and not what is best for them and their faves then it ain't going to matter at all. Because there ain't going to be anymore Jarlena, Bope, Zendall, Liaison, JaSam, LuSam, etc. Because they are going to all be gone to the great soap heaven in the sky never to be seen or heard from again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So True! Live and learn.

I do think Carlivati does follow through much better than some of his predecessors. I don't think they do long term stories anymore. Everything has to fit in that 13 week cycle they use as their boundary. And they're too quick to switch horses in mid-stream in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy