Jump to content

More Fallout From Last Year's WGA Strike


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Actually, if you go to the Nikki Finke site, and follow the link to the original post (about who went FiCore), you'll see over 100 comments. Most of those comments...largely by writers...are quite understanding of the soap ficores.

Summarizing those opinions: (a) soaps are a dying genre; (B) soap writers are not the huge earners, and (B) the key issues behind the strike (i.e., internet residuals) aren't really a big deal for soaps.

I'm not really expressing an opinion here...I'm clearly ambivalent...but it is fair to say not EVERYONE disagrees with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The funny thing is understand why soap writers had to go fi-core. Daytime is a dying industry and might not be around in a few years. It was different for primetime writers/films where DVD residuals/streaming residuals were key to strike but not key for daytime writers. I admire those who stuck it out. The ones that kept their status were Ron Carlivati, David Kriezman, Jean Passanante and a few others. You cannot fault the others that needed to do this. I mean this is the worst economy in decades with huge levels of unemployment, foreclosure, bankruptcy and repos. Especially since that the WGA was fighting for does not pertain to daytime writers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The people who went on strike and picketed made the decision they felt was best for them. The people who went Fi-Core made the decision that they felt was best for them. Judging someone else for not making the same choice as you did is ridiculous and petty. It's ass backwards... "Here are your two options, but we'll make sure we make you feel like scum if you pick one over the other..."

THEN DON'T PUT THE OPTION ON THE TABLE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You said it yourself. Everybody did what they felt was best and I believe that grown adults should always be given choices but with choices come consequences.

The people on the picket line had to deal with the consequences of that choice and the Fi-Cores have to do the same. It's not about judging people for not making the same decision, its about the fact that the fi-cores didn't risk what other union members did so they aren't entitled to the same benefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's just turning into a damn witch hunt. I love writing and that's first and foremost with me. I'm not a professional writer or a guild member, so I don't necessarily know what choice I would've made if I were in that position and if I were in that position, what factors would be present at that time to influence my decision. But I will say this, if this is not about the art or the work, but about who sided with the popular crowd and who didn't, then I say they all should restrict the Fi-Core writers from receiving any benefits from this latest strike/negotiation and any others in the future, and be done with it. You don't light the fuse and then get mad at the dynamite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am so anti union it's not even funny, and the writers strike is no different to me, so this is sort of bizarre coming from me. Those who went on strike bore financial consequences for a principle, and to garner contract concessions for the future. As is almost always the case, many of those who went on strike will never receive the benefits that came out of those negotiations. The purpose of the strike was to force the corporations to divide the financial pie more equitably among the writers, and while that goal was achieved, the pie shrunk and there are also now fewer people among whom to divide it. Many writers lost their jobs, perhaps permanently, and in fact, many writing positions were eliminated, so there are fewer jobs to vy for.

So while it is correct to say that those writers who went fi-core made a decision that was legal, albeit self serving, in the name of fairness it hardly seems right that they will reap the benefits of the bargaining tool, which they refused to participate and make the sacrifice to earn said benefits. JMO, but something about this is just offensive to my sense of fairness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In a sense I agree. Kick the Fi-Cores out of the guild and be done with it. The stigma of what they did will follow them into future jobs regardless of what the Guild does so they're essentially blacklisted anyway. (I know that if I were a showrunner I wouldn't hire one) and this is turning into quite the administrative mess. Cut them loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At least the fi-core writers were honest about it. What about all the soap writers who walked the picket lines during the day and then went home to finish off their scripts that were due the next day?

Barbara Esensten & James Harmon Brown didn't write AMC by themselves. Garin Wolfe and Michael Conforti didn't write GH by themselves. There were more people writing scripts at OLTL than just Michelle Poteet Lisanti and Jeanne Marie Ford.

I remember one interview with Michelle Patrick where she said that she had been approached by a show on another network that asked her to secretly write for them. She said no. But I'm sure for everyone like her that said no there was another writer who agreed to work in the darkness for a show.

Those people I have a problem with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honest or "in your face". At least those who refused to do their work in the light of day recognized that they were crossing a line, and were trying to avoid the consequences. The fi-core writers thumbed their noses at the strikers. I don't have any respect for either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Christian Streaty wrote her second freelance script today on Days. Surprised they gave the first funeral episode to a newbie.  
    • And the third thing, which I have no cite for, and I may look to see if one is findable, but supposedly she said that the show had too much gay content in it. And, to be fair, that could be someone making a criticism about balance & not be bigotry but when it's added to the other, that's why it bugs people.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      The greatest tv series season finale in history.   
    • Mick Savage was sooo unbearable. And more unbearable was the reaction from the female characters to him - they were acting like he is God's gift to women and sooo irresistible. To a point of unbelievable cringe. 
    • Today was a short one. Only 33 minutes.  The ‘Part One’ graphic at the beginning was pretty interesting though. I didn’t expect them to do something like that.  I like how everything was focused around John and his family and friends. Again, the acting and the dialogue was very well done and well written. And I love that they were able to incorporate Drake’s, “swing for the fences” phrase into the script. It was nice seeing everyone interact with each other, especially characters who don’t often share scenes together. It felt like every character was part of a big family or community. Plus, an outdoor funeral in June makes a lot more sense than an outdoor funeral in December.  But yeah, it’s very, very strange that Will isn’t at the funeral, especially since we know that 

      Please register in order to view this content

      I would much rather he had been there today. And, where’s Anna too? And Jack and Jennifer? What was the point of bringing them all back if they weren’t going to attend the funeral? I expected Steve to want to close down BlackPatch, though I’d rather he just retire and let Paul take it over. But I like that Kayla was there to comfort him. I wonder if he’s going to change his mind at some point.  It was nice seeing Shane again too. Now, he just needs to have more scenes with his son lol but I enjoyed seeing him comfort Marlena. I’m not really sure about his interaction with Cat though? Was it really necessary for this to happen now, at John’s funeral? They could’ve waited a little longer to introduce this story arc.  Btw, was Tate bleeding from his head in his first scene with Arianna? 
    • This is the coldest early June in my life. It's like it's January. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Now this strikes me as funny. I have it up on my acct. The thing is I only have S2. Didn't want either 1 or 3.  Perhaps I should just list all of these that I have up.  Parodies: Dirty Sexy Money, Filthy Rich Incomplete: The Monroes, All That Glitters, Falcon Crest (have all just not all up), Once & Again S2 only Complete: Models Inc, Pasadena, Pacific Palisades, Paper Dolls, Flamingo Road  
    • This is wonderful! Thank you for posting this! I loved the first two seasons and never got to see the final season when they cancelled the DVD release. I've been hoping this popped up on streaming but no luck. Happy I'll finally get to see how it ended!
    • “Gender is who you are, and sexuality is who you want.” — C.N. Lester, “Trans Like Me: A Journey for All of Us” St. Pete bridge lit for Pride

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy