Jump to content

B&B: Week of September 1, 2008


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I am watching Friday's honey bear scenes right now.

First of all, Pam bopping Donna on the head and Donna slumping in the doorway = something out of the silent movie era.

And dousing her with honey? I love Pam!

When Owen tried to distract the bear and Pam suddenly appeared? She ran out the door and Owen gave her a look like "Oh. Hey." :lol:

Jennifer Gareis may look like she's had more botox than hot dinners but I still can't helping liking ditzy Donna. What's her motive for shtupping Owen, though? A thank you for distracting the bear?

God. All this dialogue is so bad. KKL and RM look especially embarrassed about having to utter this drivel. No wonder Steffy and Marcus got the hell out of there.

Ridge: At least now...

Brooke: Oh, God.

Ridge: We know the truth.

Brooke: Donna's gonna be okay, thanks to Owen.

Oh, man. Ronn Moss is the world's worst soap actor, hands down. At least Drake Hogestyn has an eyebrow that helps out and sexual chemistry with other actors. Moss is just a mullet-wearing void of suckitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The past week was one of the most laughable things I've seen in soap history. How far B&B has fallen since Storm's death. How did it get this low? Hopefully with this story wrapped up they move onto something more exciting. It just doesn't feel like B&B anymore. It's an odd show to watch. They have the right cast in place and are wasting them. Still can't believe Jennifer Gareis got Owen over Felicia when she already has a love interest. B&B always does this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ummmmmmm...just teasing!!..........did you also like DOOL and Passions? LOL.

For me, honestly, Friday was fine. It met the test of "entertaining". It was also wildly over the top...which is not out of character for B&B...but every time it happens, it seems (to me) to drift further and further from Bill Bell's vision.

In another thread (DOOL 1969-1973), Steve Frame beautifully evokes the "forbidden love" or "love denied" theme of classic Bell. I personally feel that was a theme of his Y&R too. Think how briefly Nikki and Victor were happy.

Now, on B&B, I see it almost as the opposite...people GIVING IN all the time...and ruining their lives by doing so.

Snark has a beautiful critique of the current Katie storyline. He really does speak (for me) to the squandered opportunity. Instead of feeling enlightened by the show, most of the time I just feel silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to comment on yesterday's show - Jennifer G was the best I've ever seen her. The blue moonlight over her and her talking about feeling safe for the first time in a long time really made me appreciate her as an actress. B&B is working for me now...but that could change easily when the move the focus back to Katie and Nick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As to Snakrs GREAT blog entry--he said

"Why did B&B even bother to bring up such serious and thorny issues, only to swerve back into well-trod territory? Why create an opportunity for such spectacular drama if you can't execute it with anything more than clichéd dialogue and deus ex machina epiphanies?"

hasn't B&B always had a bit of a rep for doing this? i've never been a steady watcher so prob shouldnt' comment, but I know in Wagget's '1997 Soap Encyclopeda he mentions a few times they try for pretyt dark and taboo subjects in soaps only to then swerve into cliches tha tmake them almost insulting (one was a male sexual abuse story that I think involved tennis and the sound fo jangling keys lol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In the early days, given that it was a new soap finding its feet, I found the tone relatively consistent. It was a darker, Y&R-edged show.

I assume Bradley Bell came on in the early 90s because that's when the show began to suffer from ADD and veer wildly in tone. In the late 90s, it really got accentuated. It felt that TPTB were not taking the show seriously as a soap. Merely as an exercise. And as a viewer, I cannot tell you how dispiriting it is for me to see no follow-through in the SLs, no evolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Going from memory, Tracy Ann (last name missing...I didn't sleep well) was SW.

I know Deveney (blanking on last name...I wanna say "Dixon", but that was a psycho on the show's early years) was director of BOTH B&B AND Y&R yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Maybe it’s me, and the fact that RC isn’t at the helm, but since Cwikly and Ford have taken over I’ve noticed the show doing a lot of things differently directing wise, and since the storyline of John’s demise began, the show has been using different scores, and dare I say better ones than this time last year. It’s interesting and I wonder if the any of it is Noel Maxam’s influence before being promoted.
    • I think Nicole is about to figure out what's going on between Andre and Dani.
    • @Efulton thank you. I don't know how I missed it or didn't recall it.  I'll blame amnesia . Anyway @Errol Could the newer thread be merged to the existing? Thanks in advance.
    • I just finished watching and I have to admit, not once did I find myself wondering who wasn't there. Quick question for anyone who followed this better than I did: was it only Andrew who rescued Cat and John from Clyde, or was Shane involved too? The reactions during their scenes today felt a little off to me. I know it was meant to be vague, but I didn't find it strange that they already knew each other.  
    • Yeah, financially, Luna is in better shape than Deacon and Sheila.   -- Scott Clifton must have decided to chew the scenery in every scene of this "Liam is Dying" storyline. Yikes.  
    • If J.R. wasn't busy with Ewing Oil, he'd be a heckuva soap recapper. He was SO gleeful at recapping Jenna-Bobby-Pam when the trio and Mark encountered each other at the Oil Baron's Ball. That being said, Lucy, presumably Sue Ellen and maybe Ray should all know this story, or at least part of it. Lucy was definitely at Southfork during Jenna and Bobby's relationship, and I believe Sue Ellen was about to marry J.R. around the time Jenna jilted Bobby. (Ray might not have given a damn.)
    • Broadcasting Magazine (May 5, 1980) : Future US-Next TV : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive On page 48 there's an interview with Lee Rich about Lorimar's fortunes.
    • Broadcasting Magazine (May 5, 1980) : Future US-Next TV : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive From a May 1980 Broadcasting issue: Meredith Broadcasting in association with Alan Sloan Inc has committed itself to produce series of five half hours in soap opera form, "designed for youngers 11-14 and their parents." Programs, yet untitled, "will deal with problems teen-agers face in their relationships with peers and parents," with script topics reviewed in advance by teachers, psychologists and others. First episode is to air on Meredith's five TV's in September and ground broadcaster also anticipates syndication. If successful, idea is to go to full-fledged series. 
    • Broadcasting Magazine (May 5, 1980) : Future US-Next TV : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Looking at an old Broadcast issue with a fall schedule preview. Their description of the show: Lorimar Productions turns its cameras "below the surface of a small, traditional, thriving college town still large controlled by its founders, the Millingtons." Plot elements include "nurtured dreams, closely-held desires, closeted shame and vital truths about friends and family." Lee Rich, Michael Filerman and David Jacobs are executive producers of the Roundelay production, in association with Lorimar.  They also mention the show in a small section about advertising's point of view.  Advertising agency reaction to the new fall line-ups announced by ABC and CBS last week varied. But upfront, some agency types were apprehensive that their advertisers might be turned off by some of the new "titillating" entries. "I'm concerned about the amount of permissiveness," said one executive, with CBS' Secrets of Midland Heights commonly mentioned as one possible offender.
    • I just saw this. Thanks for sharing. The classic Y&R thread may enjoy your posts. It was in very poor taste for Andy Cohen to blindside MTS with that type of question, but I'm not surprised as he's an awful person.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy