Jump to content

OLTL Promo 9-1: Todd and Marty


Recommended Posts

  • Members

When they're a rapist and his victim, yes. It is tasteless and stupid to want them to be legitimately paired as a real couple. No amount of airy dismissal of me and eyerolling will change the fact that you're defending something morally indefensible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

^^ Oh, come on now. Are we really getting into personal attacks over an (ok, purposely contentious) soap promo? JP -- just like Toups, Marceline and everybody else on this thread -- is just stating his POV, not looking for "attention."

FTR, this is exactly the reaction from fans that RC, Frons and the ABCD marketing dept wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the story is doing exactly what it's intended to do. Promote controversy. I don't believe the fans who are hoping for a romance with Todd and Marty are necessarily former Evangeline fans or former Tea fans. I think SOME are TSJ fans who may also have been Tangeline fans because they have taken Trevor at his word when he says he wants a story separate from TnB, and support him to that end no matter what. I think another faction are chemistry junkies for whom chemistry supersedes any other storyline considerations and they actually see chemistry between SH and TSJ (although I disagree). But I suspect most of the fans in either of these contingencies are not long term viewers of the show, because most of the people who actually experienced the original rape story with Marty and Todd cannot simply disregard that history and treat it as something that happened so long ago that it no longer really matters. The rape story was designed at the time to create that kind of impact for the audience.

So most long term viewers who support the story do so for the "psychological thriller" aspect. How far will they go? What's going to happen when the truth comes out? This is the part that I find interesting, although for me, the performances just aren't working. Todd is sappy and Marty is just bland. So even though I am intrigued by where Carlivati eventually takes this, I am not interested in watching because the execution fails for me on many levels.

As with any storyline, character, pairing, there are fans who are almost entirely agenda driven in their appreciation for or opposition to a particular story. Generally, however, I think we (and I mean "we" as in me too) don't give fans enough credit. Most viewers have many reasons for liking or disliking what they're watching and they probably don't analyze their reasoning and they couldn't pin it down to one particular element even if they did take the time to figure it out. Those of us who have watched the show for years tend to minimize the opinions of the newer viewers as if we are the experts and their opinions are somehow less valid and/or important. That doesn't make them stupid. They just view the show from a very different vantage point that allows them to consider a Todd/Marty romance to be in the same category as Luke and Laura, because they didn't live the horror.

BTW. I openly admit I love attention. Is that a bad thing? :mellow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've got no problem with people having their own opinion, I just wish they'd be able to back it up. Jack, OTOH, seems to want to try to cover every single opinion possible even though he previously said he found the story disgusting. But at the same time he also seems to want to champion the rights of Tarty shippers? What? I think you can't have it both ways, and I call bullshit on that kind of behavior. I think you can paint yourself as a "rugged individualist," if you're so desperate to do that, without looking like you're spinning yourself into oblivion and willing to defend anybody talking about anything. If I were to come to you and say something crazy like, "Wow, I think a story about Matthew and Nora incest would be hot," I'd be saying something that the most sane people would probably be rightfully offended and disgusted by. Now, under freedom of speech of course you can defend to the death my right to say it...but that doesn't mean you have to be so "supportive" as to say, "well, he's not stupid or crazy for feeling that way, he just has his opinion." Come on! Of course I'd be stupid and crazy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But isn't gang rape a disgusting story concept? Child Molestation? Don't those topics fit your scenario as well? As Carlivati stated no one is going to say "Wow! I think a story about a bunch of frat boys holding a woman down and brutally gang raping her is hot!" And it wasn't hot. But most people seem to agree that it was great soap.

As for JP? He's a big boy and can take care of himself. I'll just say I didn't place the same connotation on his remarks that you did and leave it at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thinkt hats exactly what people who enjoy this storyline like. that "psychological thriller" aspect as you put it. Also,a s someone else said, its amazing to see a storyline with "two actors ina box". These two people are isolated from everyone else (well not todd, but the char's together are always alone). Its intersting. Its also a very touchy very complex storyline where many people ahve diff views on it. I love this story in theory. If i cared about marty AT ALL i would care about the storyline. but i dont. that doesnt eman i dont think its a great soap story.

Wow. Im kinda shocked someone spins this much time thinking about me. And just to be clear im not trying to paint ymself as anything. i am simply saying that name calling and bashing people just because they like a storyline you dont is just stupid. its called disagreeing. to take it to a name calling level is so 4th grade.

as for the story, it is disgusting. no doubt about it. its also facinating. ans just so you know, if you or anyone did post anything and was name called and bashed just because people dont agree i would defend you. because thats just stupid to bash someone ona personal level because of a freakin soap opera.

everyone has the right to feel whatever and however they feel about anything. and im sorry if people disagree with that, but esp in terms of a damn tv show they should not be personally bashed and called names just because you disagree with them.

thank you. i loved our discussion tonight and look forward to more discussions, debates, and disagreements without name calling and personal bashing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unfreakingbelievable

There's a poll on the hotsheet about Todd/Marty:

Would you be open to a Todd/Marty romance?

No

Yes

I'm unsure, but willing to see how the story plays out

They usually ask this kind of stuff to gauge audience reaction.

:angry:

The results:

No 71.4%

Yes 16.3%

Unsure, but willing to see how the story plays out 12.2%

At least the results aren't as high with the "yes" as I thought they'd be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy