Jump to content

OLTL: Discussion for the week August 4th-8th


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 242
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I wonder if they tried to pull a Trevor St. John (re: Todd's execution) with Justus/Sarah, what with leaking the "fired" rumor, and then saying last week "it'll be some time before we see her again".

Doesn't pack the same punch, do it? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I get the sense that the rumored Langston connection to

is what Clint will use on Dorian. The editing with them today seemed to indicate that. I'm all for that story.

Antonio and Talia got me. She's such a badass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Talia is one of my favorite characters on the show. Thankfully they haven't written her as a victim, and her character has been allowed to blossom over time. I hope they explore the Talia/Carlo relationship more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Was HEaven Can Wait the Al/Michael mess a few years ago based on the movie of the title with Warren BEatty? Wasn't that Fall? Or am I dense and you jsut mean Vicki :huh:

Also, Anna Karenina is in my top 3 novels of all time... I don't really see the Mendorra connection, or again am I confusing the stories...

I do agree with your point, I can watch and enjoy it. I start to get uncomfortable though when things affect the "real" OLTL back in Llanview. Many people said that OLTL went too far in their 80s time travel story when, during the writer's strike back then, the scabs took over and they made it so that it no longer could just be CLint's dream, when Vicki time traveled to save him. Already the current version has done the same, what with David losing his reflection, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My sentiments, exactly. I liked the 1968 stuff the first day or two. It was fun. I enjoyed it. I liked it a lot. But two weeks later? No thanks. It's just stupid and unnecessary, IMO, and I also hate the fact that all of the "real" storylines seemed to just take a back seat so that all of the 1968/Mendorra stuff could take center stage. I'm far more interested in the Starr/Cole mess (and I use the term in a good way) than in the Mendorra [!@#$%^&*].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ITA, the anniversary has been an enormous clusterfu**. The show is starting to remind me of the early days of Wheeler/Kreizman on GL because they started out with alot of viewer support because they got rid of some unpopular newbies, SORAS'd some core family's kids, and focused more on long-term characters. But it soon became clear that while they knew and understood the show's past, they didn't necessarily respect it like the viewers did and started mangling it rather quickly.

I'm sorry but when you have to start comparing your HW to Jim Reilly in order to assess his work, the train has run off the track. Jim Reilly began the slow, agonizing death of soaps by filling DOOL with worthless dreck and when it actually garnered some ratings, every other show became obsessed with trying to match or top the insanity he created. It worked for a very short time but 12-17 year olds have short attention spans and when all the demons were exorcised, vampires slayed, and clones destroyed, the only people left watching were honest to goodness soap fans who couldn't believe that their shows had sunk to such pathetic depths just to get some attention and some are only now starting to right themselves.

While I enjoyed the events surrounding the big BE shareholders meeting, Dorian's takeover, and Nash's death, this show has gone downhill so fast since that it's mind-boggling. It's funny because I began watching again as a refugee of what was, at that time, the godawful GL and now GL seems to suddenly be on the cusp of a major creative upswing while OLTL is plunging into the toilet at warp speed. In fact, OLTL is very closely resembling GL at some of it's lowest points in recent memory. The Mendorra mess is so similar to the San Cristobel debacle that's it's eerie, right down to the dastardly Thom Christopher character threatening to assassinate innocent American citizens. As fond as my memories of Tina and Carlo both are, the Mendorra story is a mess and a half. Both of these characters used to be much more intelligent and shrewd.

The '68 garbage is not only reminiscent of the Reva time travelling by jumping through paintings story, it's worse. At least the Reva story had a point: to show that Josh & Reva wered fate to be together. And Josh & Reva were legacy characters and the characters standing in for those around them in the past fit into the story in a certain way. What's the point of this? To show us that Rex & Gigi and Natalie & Jared all belong together? Who cares? The first two are dull as dishwater newbies who are being played two horrible actors while the second two characters are reprehensible criminals who defrauded the Buchanan's costing them the business Asa created and killed Nash. Why should I care? Rex as Bo? Puhleeze. Jared as Clint? Ugh. Natalie as Maria? Not even close. And why is that atrocious Fifi/Mimi/Gigi/whatever-the heck-Farah-Fath's-latest abominable-character-is-called still around at all?

I'm not even gonna get into the insulting and offensive Todd's mind-raping of Marty and the inevitable rapist/victim romance that is clearly imminent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Right, because one man is responsible for destroying an entire genre. Come on. And soaps were way ridiculous before Jim Reilly ever started writing. Jim Reilly was successull for FIVE STRAIGHT YEARS leading up to DAYS highest ratings in the 90's. When DAYS was sitting in what, 7th, 8th, place in 1992, Jim Reilly went out and brought in new viewers (I being one of them).

When Buried Alive happened, did those viewers with "short attention span" leave? No. When Masion Blanche happened, or when Sami raped Austin and got pregnent, or when The Possession happened, or when Aremid happened or when Lady in a Cage happened, or when Susan Banks arrived and held Kristen/Marlena in a Secret Room, did those viewers with "short attention span" leave? No. It's not his fault other people in the industry didn't understand his method of madness. Jim Reilly had more entertaining stories in those 5 years than DAYS has had in the last 10 years.

I think it's one of the best storylines in daytime. Mind-raping is totally awesome to watch. More bad guys should do it more often...like Stefano Dimera...I hope he mind-rapes Marlena for putting him in a coma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

      Why didn't Steve respect Monica and Jeff's decision?  I get he's Jeff's father, and that's how it came out, but I don't like the ethics of the story.
    • Question: Jon-Michael Reed's review of 1977 is up in the retro soap section.  It includes a fleeting reference to comedic scenes between Jeanne Cooper and Julianna McCarthy regarding “Kay's would-be beau, Ralph the Plumber”.  Could someone please fill me in will more details? I forgot that Kay and Liz were friendly before Jill stole Kay's husband.  And the thought of Liz playing a comedic scene blows my mind, because I only recall her being dour both in demeanor and wardrobe.  
    • I said on Twitter on Friday when Leslie mentioned Chicago that perhaps she might be related to one of Anita's bandmates. Since we hardly know anything about Leslie's childhood background. In addition, Leslie said she grew up listening to The Articulettes….
    • There was a scene in the past week or two with Leslie looking at some papers and mementos, which included an invitation or souvenir from Alan's memorial service or funeral -- it was dated as November 2024. Me just guessing but it seems to me that Martin's nightmares about the accident are from something longer ago than November.
    • ah thanks! do you know who the third one was in the blonde? the fifth one i know ive seen before in the brown wig but i forgot, and then ive never seen the psychic one before lol
    • I felt for Ted early on but as the story unfolded it has changed my opinion on him. To know he was cheating while his wife was struggling to give him a baby is a lot to deal with. Plus, this happened ages ago and still he's paying Leslie off and threatening her to leave town.  What really caused me to lose him in this episode was how even though he was busted, he still refused to take responsibility and come clean and the way he talked to Martin and Eva was terrible. To tell Smitty he better get Martin away from him when that is his SON who he used to cover up his affair? That is true dog behavior. Ted seems upset he got caught but I'm not seeing the remorse I would need to want Nicole to forgive him. I'm curious how I'll feel after Ted gets to talk to Nicole but I need him to fix it with the rest of the family as well.
    • I'm sorry. I well remember Jake doing Doris but I have no independent memory of the story around it.  Krystle with a K Lake, sure, both Tony the Tuna stories & NOT.  And, Jake also impersonated a woman named Bunny Eberhardt but he didn't know she was a woman so there was no drag. This weekend I re-watched Kevin & Mac, GH, and my strong impression is exactly what it was when I watched it in real time: They did not let them look very pretty. Of course, I think the best ever drag on GH was Alexis posing as the Q butler.  In a different use of drag at AW one Halloween, Jensen Buchanan went as Charlie Chaplin & Judi Evans went as, I think, a male gypsy.   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm not sure who wanted them to dump REUNION & instead do a "Dallas-like daytime show" but it seems that it def came from NBC to AW through Rauch, so, yes, it absolutely could have been his (cough-another-stupid?) decision!!!! I've just begun the new Lisanti book so maybe I will find out. (I waited for the kindle version to come out.) I would apologize for being so critical & so sarcastic, too, but, well, I'm not actually sorry!  Silverman was NOT a friend to AW.  And, I believe the critique is on point & deserved! I wanted to explain why I think the timing is off for the 90 minute show to be a reaction to the GH Luke & Laura story & its hype. Because, for sure, networks & production companies did react to it! The first 90 minute show was Monday, March 5, 1979.  And, there was some unknown amount of time ahead of that with people arguing about it & then, planning it.  The Luke & Laura wedding was mid-November 1981.  They were on the run from Frank Smith & stayed overnight in Wyndham's Dept. Store early August 1980. 
    • terrible at using forums and inserting photos, but jake in another world had a drag persona named doris, anyone know the episode or year? http://www.anotherworldhomepage.com/ffad19.jpg
    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy