Jump to content

OLTL: Discussion for the week July 28th-August 1st


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 162
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The pacing on this show over the past week has been horrible. How the hell could Ron C leave the Mendorra story on a huge cliffhanger with Sarah going over the falls and 4 days later, we STILL havent not returned to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow! Today must have been "stimulating"! Ten (11 counting this one) whole posts! Little or no content. I want to know what you guys think. Come on! This isn't the board to just go to and gush gratuitously. Does anyone really have anything interesting to say about today's OLTL? It's a challenge. I know.

I'll start! And I didn't even watch for reasons I won't go into. I may watch on soapnet later if I catch it.

1) John and Blair: I don't really care about the caliber of their love scenes. These are two beautiful and talented performers who are very experienced in doing love scenes and who are going to look good together. That was a given! No surprises there. I don't even have to watch today's show to know they were probably hot and titillating. But that's not why I watch OLTL. I want to know what the story is? I've seen Blair love scenes before and I've seen John love scenes before. How different are they going to be? Is there a story? Or are they just a plot point to make Todd jealous and spiral even further out of control.

2) I like Addie. I find her relationship with David both skeevy and healthy at the same time. I get that Addie is so totally clued in to who David is, and what he is up to. She's not being a fool. She sees the big picture (because she's been so removed from the myopathy of real living) and she knows whatever she and David have isn't the long term picture. I love that she's so wise and yet so naive.

3) I am really liking the Viki/Charlie story. The former writers would have just stuck Viki/Charlie together and called it a day. But Carlivati is creating this continuing saga that's carefully being developed. I am not sure he knows where he's taking them, and they don't get enough screentime, but anytime they share scenes, I feel like I need to watch. In fact, so much so, they're the only reason I will make an effort to catch soapnet later tonight.

4) Spoilered for spoiler free people:

How do you like my contribution so far? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well for me, not posting boils down to the fact that no news is good news. I've been enjoying every hour of OLTL that I can catch.

Friday's episode, pertaining to Viki/Dorian's scenes, was fantastic. I so love their rapport and Viki/Dorian are the TRUE supercouple at the heart of the show. OLTL wouldn't be OLTL without it. The day Dorian stops living in reaction to Viki is the day the show needs to be canceled. The hell with Mel's advice. Did he not know Dorian at all?!

As for today, it was all very clear, focused scenes.

John/Blair - I like their chemistry, I guess I always have, and part of me wanted them to just stay friends. But this could be interesting. I feel like the actors took extra time to express that this connection was about themselves and each other, and not about Todd. I didn't see DePaiva putting forth that "Oh, I just need to wash that Todd right outta mah hair!" vibe, here. It was more about Blair being done, Blair wanting to take care of herself, look at herself, rediscover herself again, and here John was just appreciating her, understanding her, sympathizing with her, and not judging her for anything she's ever done. Blair brings out the fun side to John, and I liked that John was kind of hungrily wanting Blair to stay the night. He is an emotional cripple, but he seems to acknowledge it most with Blair, through her jokes and her making fun of him. LOVED him defending himself against her attack on his all-black wardrobe. "I have a pair of sweatpants in there!" John said. "What color are they?" Blair wondered. "Navy." Well delivered Easton! You know what I like best about this pairing? It's the first one that happened slowly, over time, organically, and wasn't manufactured like his past relationships with Natalie or Marty. Evangeline was kind of a "WTF" out of nowhere twist when it started, but it still lacked logical basis, and I thought Evangeline character integrity was sacrificed to support her pairing with John. But Blair is MORE Blair with John, not less Blair. Hope that makes sense.

Dorian/David/Addie - I love Pamela Payton-Wright and she sure doesn't have the easiest character to play! I was terrified when she oddly responded "it's raining" that she was going to relapse after David said he was leaving her. But she was firm and strong as ever. I think this was the least-clear of the writing today, though. David waffled, between leaving her, wanting to be with her, and not wanting to have the money taken away from him. If it was intentional, it confused the hell out of me about David's motives and throughline. I have no idea what he's about right now. I can't rave enough about how well Addie's being written, and I believe her miraculous recovery was a story started to pass the time during the writer's strike, and I worried it would be dropped when the strike ended. But it seems to have been spun even MORE into gold, and it's made me want to see Addie as a contract regular (though it seems very unlikely). Addie definitely is more refined and polished than Dorian, more old world charm and more emotional clarity, less "walking open wound" than Dorian is. It's surprising, considering her child-like state for most of her life. A miracle indeed. But it makes perfect sense that her whole purpose now is to live the life she never got to lead while in St. Ann's. I want Addie and David's "love" to become real, but I'll settle for Addie finding true love and everlasting marriage with someone else. Not sure who. Payton-Wright is so damn likeable!

Viki/Charlie - This is one honest-to-goodness, true-to-life, damn great love story for "mature characters". I love that Charlie is a man that's not afraid to cry. He's world weary, he's NOT perfect, he's made mistakes, he's not painted as any kind of hero. Sloan was propped as an army hero. Ben was propped as the heroic "everyman" who needed rescuing from the mob. It was all so gimmicky. Charlie's biggest enemy is himself and his own demons and that has done so well in providing obstacles for their love so far, even if Dorian took advantage of one or two of Charlie's faults. And the romance isn't age-specific. It's just simple, classic, and timeless. It's not trying to be what Viki's later-life love story is "supposed" to be. It's just natural. Kerwin is magic and has made Charlie so good and honest and sympathetic despite his faults. It must be so easy for Slezak to play that love Viki has for him. He's the kind of older man I'd want if I was Viki's age! You just wanna hug him. OLTL has the most diverse "old guard" in daytime, and that's well-developed characters. Dorian, Viki, Charlie, Clint, Nora, Bo, Lindsay, Roxanne. They are all VERY different people who for the most part stay true to their nature. Amazing. We just need an extra guy or two so Roxy and Dorian can get some real lovin'. But I think it really says something about the show if the "mature romances" are so much better developed, performed, and written than the younger love stories of say, Natalie/Jared, Rex/Gigi, and Starr/Cole.

Todd/Marty - I saved this for last because I'm still working on how I feel about these scenes. There's so much said, and EVERYTHING Todd said to Marty was true. And his only lies were by omission. It's the most I've seen St. John really perform in months, and the most sympathetic I've seen Todd. I know it's hard to tell where they are going and what the point is. I think the overall purpose is to reestablish Haskell's Marty, and establish her opposite St. John's Todd, since Haskell's only appearances with him were very short ones (Todd's trial for raping Blair, and the dream where Marty haunted Todd). I doubt this story would have at all been played out if Christina Chambers was brought back as Marty again. It wouldn't have happened and wouldn't have had the same weight anyway. But I think the point is to reestablish the Marty/Todd connection, twisted and imperfect as it is, with Haskell and St. John in the roles. The storm, the close quarters, the retelling of the story that connected the characters. It's all to establish what their relationship is. I imagine so that the audience can get behind whatever years of future story they plan to mine between the two of them, as their mutual grandchild is (hopefully) born and grows up. The fact that Todd is taking advantage of Marty's helplessness now will only respark the hatred and kill any peaceful coexistence that might have come about since the long-ago gang rape.

I hope Marty shoots Todd in the chest when she gets her memory back. I really do. Especially since she IS opening up to him and allowing herself to be vulnerable around him and asking him to stay overnight in her room so she isn't alone. That will dredge up any guilty feelings that a rape victim might feel... she will feel raped again (mind-raped) and she will feel she allowed it to happen. She'll blame herself for having amnesia, she'll hate Todd all over again. I think this is all just to reset the stage for Marty and Todd to be poised as great enemies. And Todd is entirely reponsible, and all the while he thought he was redeeming himself, by helping her, and he just has no idea HOW to do good.

So I'm not giving up hope on this story.

I like that every day I watch an episode, every scene I do still hear a key phrase or interaction that either completely clarifies what makes two characters dynamic, or I feel I've walked away from an episode having seen a new side to one or more characters. The characters still surprise me, and none of the dialogue REALLY feels manipulative or agenda-pushing. I don't think the writers try to hide characters' flaws, they relish in the characters' flaws! The propping and agenda-pushing on daytime is from trying to make the audience feel a way that past history doesn't reinforce. It's contradiction, two-facedness, inconsistent. OLTL is harshly honest about their characters, and that's what I find refreshing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I also wonder if it was considered controversial at the time to show a morally corrupt doctor?(another character troupe for Agnes Nixon, the upstanding male citizen who is hiding secrets back at home) Up until the early 1970s, prime-time would very rarely tell stories about the private lives of doctors, because advertisers tended to shy away from such content. @robbwolff -- so is this wrong that Ruth dated David before marrying Joe?  Dr. David Thornton is a fictional character from the ABC daytime soap opera All My Children, portrayed by Paul Gleason from 1976 to 1978.  He was introduced as a respected physician in Pine Valley, presenting himself as a widower to his colleagues at the hospital. This facade, however, concealed a darker truth: his wife, Edna Thornton, was alive, and he was leading a double life. David’s character is defined by manipulation and secrecy, as he maintained a carefully curated public image while engaging in deceitful and criminal behavior in his personal life. His relationships were marked by control and betrayal, particularly in his marriage to Edna and his romantic entanglements with other women. David’s charm and professional status allowed him to navigate Pine Valley’s social circles, but his actions revealed a calculating and ruthless nature. Career David was a doctor at Pine Valley Hospital, where he was well-regarded by his peers for his medical expertise. His professional life provided him with a veneer of respectability, which he exploited to mask his personal misdeeds. However, his career was not a central focus of his storyline; instead, it served as a backdrop to his personal schemes. His position at the hospital gave him access to resources, such as the drug digitalis, which he later used in his attempt to murder his wife. David’s professional life unraveled as his criminal actions came to light, tarnishing his reputation in the medical community. Personal Relationships and Family David’s family and romantic relationships were fraught with tension and deception, shaping much of his narrative arc: Edna Thornton (Wife): David was married to Edna Thornton, with whom he had a daughter, Dottie. To his colleagues, he claimed Edna was deceased, allowing him to pursue other relationships without suspicion. In reality, David was plotting to kill Edna, motivated by his desire to be free of her and possibly to gain financial or personal freedom. He began poisoning her with digitalis, a heart medication, which caused her to experience heart pains. Edna was unaware of David’s true intentions until after his death, when the truth about his poisoning scheme was revealed. Dottie Thornton (Daughter): David and Edna’s daughter, Dottie Thornton, was a significant character in All My Children. Portrayed by Dawn Marie Boyle (1977–1980) and later Tasia Valenza (1982–1986), Dottie was raised primarily by Edna. David’s neglectful and manipulative behavior extended to his daughter, as he showed little genuine care for her well-being. Dottie’s life was impacted by her father’s actions, particularly after his death, when Edna became a wealthy widow. Dottie later married Thaddeus “Tad” Martin in 1985, though their marriage ended in divorce in 1986, and she suffered the loss of an unborn child with Tad. Ruth Parker (Fiancée, 1976): David was engaged to Ruth Parker in 1976, furthering his pattern of deceit since he was still married to Edna. His engagement to Ruth, who was also involved with Jeff Martin, highlighted David’s willingness to manipulate romantic partners for his own gain. The engagement did not lead to marriage, as David’s true intentions and double life began to surface. Christina “Chris” Karras (Lover, 1978): In 1978, David began a romantic relationship with Dr. Christina “Chris” Karras, a fellow physician. This affair added another layer of complexity to his web of lies, as Chris was unaware of his marriage to Edna and his poisoning scheme. After David’s death, Chris was initially accused of his murder due to their relationship and her access to medical resources. However, Jeff Martin’s investigation cleared her name by proving David’s death was caused by his own actions. Parents: David’s parents are unnamed in the source material, and both are noted as deceased. No further details are provided about their influence on his life or their role in his backstory. Death David Thornton’s death in 1978 was a dramatic and fitting conclusion to his villainous arc, brought about by his own treachery. Intent on killing Edna to escape their marriage, David had been secretly administering digitalis to her, causing her heart issues. In a twist of fate, their daughter, Dottie, innocently switched Edna’s drink with David’s during one of his poisoning attempts. Unaware that the drink was laced with a lethal dose of digitalis, David consumed it and suffered a fatal heart attack. His death was initially investigated as a possible murder, with Chris Karras as the prime suspect due to her relationship with David and her medical knowledge. However, Dr. Jeff Martin conducted a toxicology screen on David’s body, which revealed that the digitalis poisoning was the cause of both Edna’s heart pains and David’s death. This evidence exonerated Chris and exposed David’s plan to kill his wife, cementing his legacy as a tragic and self-destructive figure. Impact and Legacy David Thornton’s storyline, though relatively short-lived (1976–1978), was impactful due to its intensity and the ripple effects on other characters. His death left Edna a wealthy widow, altering her and Dottie’s circumstances and setting the stage for further drama, including Edna’s manipulation by conman Ray Gardner. David’s actions also strained relationships among other Pine Valley residents, particularly through his engagement to Ruth Parker and affair with Chris Karras, which intersected with Jeff Martin’s storyline. His character exemplified the classic soap opera archetype of a charming yet duplicitous villain whose downfall is precipitated by his own hubris. Additional Notes Portrayal: Paul Gleason’s performance as David Thornton brought a compelling intensity to the role, making the character memorable despite his brief tenure. Gleason’s ability to portray both charm and menace suited David’s dual nature as a respected doctor and a scheming husband. Storyline Context: David’s arc occurred during the early years of All My Children, a period when the show focused on intricate personal dramas and moral dilemmas. His poisoning plot and double life were emblematic of the show’s penchant for high-stakes interpersonal conflict. Lack of Additional Family Details: Beyond Edna and Dottie, no other family members (such as siblings or extended relatives) are mentioned in the source material, limiting the scope of his familial connections. Conclusion Dr. David Thornton was a multifaceted antagonist in All My Children, whose life was marked by professional success, personal deception, and a fatal miscalculation. As a doctor, he wielded authority and respect, but his secret plan to murder his wife, Edna, revealed a cold and calculating core. His relationships with Edna, Dottie, Ruth Parker, and Chris Karras were defined by manipulation, and his death by accidental self-poisoning was a poetic end to his schemes. David’s legacy in Pine Valley lived on through Edna’s newfound wealth and Dottie’s subsequent storylines, making him a pivotal figure in the show’s early narrative. His story remains a classic example of soap opera drama, blending betrayal, tragedy, and retribution.
    • The only blonde I see is one of the actual women staring at first & then screaming & running later.  DAYS: Vivian's manservant Ivan is in a long curly red wig. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Y&R: long straight black wig is the actor Peter Barton whose character name I am blanking on.   
    • I very much liked office Cleary and the actress who portrayed her (as you say, Mary Peterson).  A shame her turn didn't evolve into a contract role.   BTW, does anyone know the timeframe/years that Betty Rae served as casting director?  If i understand correctly, she not only led the effort for contract roles, but also for shorter 13- and 26-week roles.  IMO, GL had LOTS of very well-casted, limited roles, too. I'm surprised the actors throughout the soap industry, and especially P&G actors, have not assembled a book or something similar, praising Rae.  Each actor could write a few paragraphs or a page of text describing his or her experience.
    • No. Ruth had an extramarital affair with David while married to Joe.
    • I'm not sure I agree with Bernstein's children on that. Bernstein's life and activism here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Bernstein#Social_activism_and_humanitarian_efforts
    • Thursday & Friday's episodes were excellent. The build-up was most definitely worth the wait (2 months). TMG, I can't give her enough accolades. AM, was also absolutely incredible. I think the fallout is going to have a ripple effect. The little clues that have been dropped,  hopefully, will weave seamlessly to reveal even bigger bombshells for the Dupree's and Martin.
    • Thanks, msn drives me nuts on the one hand but on the other hand their headlines appeal to me. And, I just don't do FoxNews.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy