Jump to content

Bill Bell's DOOL: 1966-1973


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

For some reason, I was thinking about this thread yesterday.

While having never seen Bill Bell's Days, it occurred to me that he had never been very good at portraying romance on Y&R (80s GH and NBC soaps having ruined me forever, of course). Y&R, by contrast, was rather stilted and formal in its approach to romantic relationships.

Which is why reading about Days here -- with its emphasis on affairs of the heart -- is so interesting.

Bell must have been a genius at portraying angst. It wasn't the romance itself, it was the pain of separation or forbidden love that most likely drove his writing (and therefore the success of early Days).

This is no surprise, given that Bell was an ad-man during the golden age of advertising (40s and 50s). Advertising at that time was hugely influenced by advanced theories of psychoanalysis which were brought to the US from emigrés fleeing warring Europe. Psychoanalysis gave backstory to people's deepest fears and strongest desires. This in turn gave advertisers the vocabulary to target those same fears and desires.

That's maybe why Bell was also so good at seeing what worked and jettisoning what didn't. "Listen to your customer -- they are always right!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are right.

All of Bell's stories were about the forbidden.

Bill & Laura loved one another when they shouldn't have.

Eric loved Susan even though he was married to her brother Greg.

Julie and Doug loved one another even though she was married; and then he reversed it by having Julie free and Doug married.

It was always about the longing to be together.

Fans of today's Days would not have been happy with Bell's Days at all. They want their couples together. Bell's couples were hardly ever together. They always were longing to be together.

Out of the 14 years that Bill & Laura were a couple, they were only happily married for about 2 years of it. It took them forever to get together and then once they were together Bill had the affair with Kate and they separated.

Same with Doug & Julie. It took them 6 years to marry and after that they were attacked on every corner. Julie's rape. Julie getting burned and pushing Doug away. Julie marrying Lee.

It is stuff that was a ratings grabber back then, but today the fans would be so up in arms over it and calling for the writer's heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't have an exact list of storylines but to me the Bell years can basically be summed up in a few couples:

Marie & Tommy/Mark - Marie falls for her brother Tommy who has had plastic surgery. Can't deal with it and runs off to join the monastery.

Bill/Laura/Mickey - brother rapes his brother's wife and teh fallout from it. It all leads to Mickey finally learning the truth even after Bill and Laura have fought to keep him from finding out that Bill is Mike's father and not Mickey. Mickey gets amnesia and believes he is Marty Hansen and meets and falls in love with Maggie. Sidenote story Mike has a hard time dealign with everything and even fears he might be homosexual and sleeps with Mickey's secretary Linda to prove his manhood.

Julie/Susan/David/Doug/Addie - Julie & Susan were rivals. Julie wanted David but he was only in love with Julie. Julie seduces him and gets pregnant. She gives the child up for adoption and eventually marries the adoptive father, Scott Banning, to get close to the child. Julie meets Doug who Susan has hired to swindle Julie. Julie falls in love with Doug but can't be with him because she is married to Scott Banning. By the time Julie is free, Doug has fallen in love with Addie, Julie's mother and married her. Julie wants to fight her mother for Doug but can't because Addie is diagnosed with leukemia. Somewhere in the process of all this Susan killed David while temporarily insane and goes on trial for it.

Susan/Greg/Eric - Susan after she is cleared of murder charges by Mickey with Bill and Tom's help, falls in love with Greg Peters. But Greg's brother Eric also falls in love with Susan and just like Bill did with Laura, he raped her and she got pregnant with his child.

Everybody else on the show durring these times pretty much supported these basic stories. These were the basic storylines that went on for years. they each had subplots here and there such as Maggie's surgery to cure her paralysis; David's (Julie's son not the father) return to town; and so on - but they all were part of the bigger storyline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It wasn't for me. Soaps of that day all generally followed the same formula. It was the angst that drew you in everyday and made the little payoffs when they came so much more enjoyable and blissful.

You waited with baited breath for the first time your couple kissed, the first time they held hands was a big deal, and the first time they made love was so special. And the weddings were spectacular events. I mean promos were made out of a couple finally kissing.

And you weren't spoiled by it either in the mags or by day ahead previews. It was a surprise for you and you couldn't wait to tune in each day to see if today was the day it was going to finally happen. You escaped into the program, and all the aspects of why they couldn't be together now were discussed and their actions were examined along with their motives. You knew why they did the things they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And thank God for that. I'm glad Y&R doesn't have the problems in as grand of a scale that DAYS has with fanbases dictating storylines and boycotting the show because their favourite couple isn't getting the storyline they want.

DAYS can almost single-handedly trace their current problems back to those couple fanbases they created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I love that stuff!! I hated when things are rushed. I like it when things are slow and you make a big deal of the key moments. It's one of the things I love about Reilly and I sense that he learned that from Bill Bell. I wish I could've seen Bill Bell's stuff. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Same here. I miss the almost-kisses, the longing, the delayed gratification. LOL, the extended foreplay!

JER took it to a whole other level (and I hated when they had long flashbacks to the previous day's episode). But the essence of soaps -- building something up, taking your time, attention to detail, juggling other stories at the same time -- that's what attracted me to Daytime in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But that is just never going to happen again. I have yet to study marceline's thesis that nostalgia has killed the soaps, but even right now — I completely agree with her.

If you wanted to tell such a story today, the audience would go crazy, it just wouldn't be possible. I mean, nowadays primetime has a lot of (bad) influence of soaps: how on Earth are you going to tell a slow, angst storyline developing over 2 years or more when you have a show like Heroes having 5 A stories and God will know how many B and C stories.

Maybe I am wrong, but I have this feeling that people want high adrenaline, fast paced storytelling from daytime, too. With 250 episodes a year that just isn't possible without burning the show from top to bottom. And everywhere around daytime - ashes. Ashes, ashes everywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess they want them "BAM! together" also because they have already seen the never-ending circling around. It's just getting old, sadly. Everyone has done it. We know how it's going to end and we don't want to watch it.

I also forgot an important thing about act breaks: nowadays most shows are transitioning from four-act structure into five-act (some even flirt with six acts!). That is just insane, it means that six times during a show there has to be a mini-cliffhanger! Networks want more commercial breaks and, I forgot which writer said it, they want longer opening sequences to hook viewers. And those openings have become another act. Go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to diss Marceline's thesis (which I would love to hear more about). But nostalgia is everywhere, too -- some prefer the term retro -- and IMO it actually powers shows all over Primetime. What is Desperate Housewives if not a deceptively slow-burning retroesque soap that visually cites the 50s and 60s at every turn?

Ugly Betty gives off the impression that SLs are moving at a lightening pace -- when in fact they are treading water in arguably the most delightful telenovela-esque manner.

The Hills -- uber (un)reality soap that GL and B&B seem bent on copying? Nothing happens. Lauren plays with her hair, fits in the pretence of work around sunbathing and incessant talking about her boyfriend. The choice of background music clues you in to her mood since she can barely, like, verbalize it herself.

The audience "not allowing" a soap to tell a certain story? I don't buy this. Fanbases have attempted to bring down shows and dominate proceedings, but few -- if any -- have ever succeeded. And the idea that TPTB listen to their audience in order to do their bidding is hilarious! TPTB do what they want, they may use "the fans" as an excuse to turf out somebody behind-the-scenes for political reasons, but if they want to push a story, they WILL do it and spin it their way. Guza's GH being a massive case in point.

I think people are definitely more used to fast-paced shows (and movies. And X-box etc) and have shorter attention spans. But not all.

The diversity of shows -- and networks -- available to the general public is astounding, though. Not all are fast-paced, flashy, CSI-franchised music videos. There is a balanced televisual diet out there: different genres, different approaches, drama, comedy, dramedy, documentary, reality shows, talk shows, political discussion, movies, sports, etc., etc. People dip in and out depending on their mood. They can't have hyper-pace all of the time. TV is used for winding down and touching base as well as immediate thrill and recharge.

Honestly, I don't think soaps would be able to drag out a love story without a kiss for, say, two years. But they are canny at drawing stuff out and filling the waiting space with other details, stories, distractions. Audiences ate it up then; I still think they could now. Especially if the soaps decided to return to a half-hour format. Less pressure on the writers, cast and audience to deliver immediate action and immediate (diminished) pay-off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One thing is to hint at retro, quite different to tell stories at a lethargic pace. Even though you may have an impression that a show is copying something from the 50s or 60s, all you have to do is to sit down, count the acts, the A and B stories, number of scenes etc. Pay close attention to all those all-important details. At the same time, I know that audiences actually hate shows like Lost because the whole mammoth edifice of mystery is built in front of them and they have no patience and motive to get into it all. Even J. J. Abrams who invented the show and invented the hatch doesn't know what's going on on that show. He said it himself when talking about his new TV project Fringe.

I don't watch The Hills regularly, occasionally I check it for the decor or something, but I hate it. Reality shows, even though they are scripted, are a different animal from soaps.

And Betty is just a show that could be and in my eyes only saved by the divine America. It suffers from catastrophic cast malfunctions, starting with Vanessa and Eric, that just clog the screen when a much better actors could be in those roles. It also suffers from the fact that Silvio Jake 2.0 Horta developed it.

I am not saying they wouldn't allow it — I'm saying they would be extremely unsatisfied with the lethargic pace, the ratings would drop and everybody would scream "We want a new HW!" Fans have never had a direct influence on the show, but just take a look at DOOL and its infamous fanbases: hey haven't destroyed it by not allowing a HW to write, they destroyed it by wanting too many different things at the same time, giving the honchos a wrong idea of what that show is supposed to be etc.

I wish you were right! But I think you're not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the biggest reason soap fans get impatient is because they already know what is going to happen so they are really wanting to get through what they know is going to happen to something they don't know.

I mean with all the previews and the spoilers and stuff - everything is just that spoiled. So they want that to happen and get over with. They want there to be more to the actual show than what they read or saw in previews was going to happen. They just don't realize it.

Cat makes some excellent points in her last post about some of the primetime shows. Shows like Big Brother wouldn't be successful if people didn't still want some kind of angst and surprise. There is no way that a show like Big Brother can spoil everything. I mean people pay for the live feeds so they can sit there and watch 24 hours a day - just waiting and hoping something will happen.

Look at a show like Lost. If that is not proof that a daytime show with the right kind of writing and lack of spoilers can pull off the old type of show then nothing is.

Lost still gets decent ratings after what 3 or 4 seasons now. They are still on that damn island and we are still waiting to find out all the secrets and know if they will ever get off that damn island.

I just did an editorial about this very subject for my SoapsWEB site.

THere has got to be yearning and angst on the screen for viewers to build yearning and angst for the show. That is just not there anymore - both in front of the camera and for the viewers off screen too.

**************************

REad more about it:

Check out my latest editorial - finally got around to doing another:

Where Did the Yearning & Angst Go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • To me, that made no difference. The point stands whether Eva wants to be a Dupree or not. Anita was 110% on top of things. Also it's a logical inference that Eva might be interested in having a place in her supposedly real family. Frankly though I wonder if Eva knows how to feel ... yet. She could really be confused.
    • Does Jack ever dress in drag during that early '00s period where he was trying to get Jennifer back...or does he just fake being gay around then?
    • Here you go, by special request! https://www.instagram.com/p/DJlXDnWJImW/ DAYS 9-26-90 Matt Ashford as Jack Deveraux in drag
    • Concluding 1976... Raymond Schafer arrives in Springfield and begins an extensive probe into Malcolm’s death, puzzling Ed, who wonders why most of Schafer’s question sessions keep turning back to Rita’s involvement with Malcolm. Ed assures the man that Rita’s only connection with Malcolm was as his nurse; he is unaware that Schafer knows a great deal more about Rita than he does. Just to protect Rita, Ed has Mike check on Schafer’s credentials, and learns that he’s a  well-respected criminal attorney. The waitress at the restaurant where Malcolm suffered his stroke tells Schafer that the woman who was with him reacted very professionally to the sudden emergency, as if she were a nurse. Realizing that her little sister has fallen hard for Tim, Rita warns him that she’s very vulnerable and innocent, but Tim tells Rita her advice isn’t necessary. But Tim then receives a plum job offer to be chief neurological resident at a prestigious Philadelphia hospital and can’t pass up the opportunity. Evie is crushed by the news and spends the next several days at home crying. Joe Werner, fully recovered, has accepted a post as a medical aide in a destitute village in India and leaves alone, with Sarah to follow him later. Justin asks Sarah to consider a partnership with him in private practice, but she explains that she thrives on the hospital atmosphere. When a call comes from India that Joe has had another massive attack, Sarah leaves on the next available flight and arrives only moments before he dies. The painful news is relayed back to Cedars at once. Sara returns from India a heartbroken woman, but the day-to-day involvement of raising T.J. and of her career seem to be her salvation. Justin shows a surprisingly compassionate and understanding side to Sara, but, ironically, Justin’s ex-wife, Jackie, arrives in Springfield with her diabetic father, who is suffering from a heart attack. In the process of consulting with Justin on her father’s condition, Jackie comes face to face with Sara for the first time since their college days. Evie’s heartbreak at Tim’s departure turns to fury and hatred when she inadvertently discovers a letter which Tim wrote to Rita just after he left. In it he concedes that Rita was right about Evie’s vulnerability where he was concerned but reminds Rita that he badly hurt her in the same way she feared Evie would suffer. Evie is now sure that Rita somehow forced Tim to leave town and is livid at the idea that Tim was Rita’s lover. She insists she’s cutting off her relationship with Rita and will pay her back for any help she’s received in the past. Ben and Hope’s wedding plans are off, as Ben, while still insisting he’s innocent, won’t explain why the robbery evidence points to him. Hope feels his unwillingness to tell her the truth makes marriage to him impossible, but confides to Ann that she is miserable without him. Ben has echoed these sentiments to Mike but won’t confide in him, either as Hope’s father or as an attorney.   Holly is trying very hard to build a life without Ed, but since she sees him virtually every day at work,she’s unable to put him out of her mind. She accepts a date with a member of the hospital administration staff but is unable to avoid making comparisons between Ed and this young man and winds up alone, sadly holding Ed’s picture and recalling how much she loves him. Believing that the hospital board’s conclusions on Grainger’s death have settled the question once and for all, Rita has regained her self-confidence, and her romance with Ed is growing daily. They admit their love for each other, and Ed confides that he intentionally  held back with Rita for fear of making another mistake. Rita then tells Ed she has never married because for her marriage must be forever. Rita’s mother realizes that Rita is truly in love when she confides in her that she doesn’t understand why she’s been so lucky in having him love her and how she wants to be the very best person she can be for him. Ed proposes marriage to Rita and gives her time to think about it before answering. Rita painfully realizes that her past could, if it rose again against her, make a life with Ed a lost dream. But Raymond Shaefer has been quietly but efficiently carrying on his investigation and has learned that Grainger argued with Rita at her apartment. He presents the evidence he’s compiled to District Attorney Eric Van Gelder, who decides the case warrants further investigation. Rita goes to Ed’s office to tell him she loves him but can’t marry him, that she doesn’t deserve him and “can’t do it to him.” As she turns from a confused Ed to leave, she finds the district attorney and a police officer outside Ed’s door, waiting to arrest her. Ed, insisting that a serious mistake has been made, calls Mike to help her as Rita, shocked and humiliated, is taken under arrest through the hallways of the hospital in which she works. Mike manages Rita’s release on bail only after she has had to submit to the degrading booking procedure. Mike sees her alone at her apartment, explaining he can help her only if she tells him the whole truth. Rita equivocates until Mike mentions Texas, indicating to Rita that he knows at least some of the story. Van Gelder has, in fact, let Mike see the bulk of evidence in the case against Rita, to convince him her arrest wasn’t a capricious whim. Rita explains to Mike that Malcolm believed she intentionally vilified him to his father, to do him out of his rightful inheritance, and then wanted his father dead to collect her money. Mike expresses his appreciation of Rita’s honesty, promising to help her. But Rita’s tormented dreams confirm that she hasn’t yet told all the truth, and after Peggy visits, expressing firm support, Rita tells Roger she has to reveal his part in the story. Roger painfully tells Rita about his being Christina’s father to show her that if Ed knew, it would end Rita’s chances with him forever. Rita, who was ready to tell Ed the whole story, now realizes how risky that would be. Adding to Rita’s pain is her forced leave of absence from the hospital until she’s cleared and the embarrassment of seeing her name in the headlines.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • Yes, but the stories are all pretty awful Seeing Victor rehashing his hatred of the Abbotts  when he married one of them and has a daughter that is half Abbott as well as walking around with Traci's daughter's heart keeping him alive makes him look worse than he already is. And I remember he and Jack chatting amicably in the past few years. Victor interfering in Kyle/Claire is just repeat of Billy/Victoria. Sharon, Nick,Phyllis etc are around but again the stories are lacking.
    • I think Kevin's 1996 Emmy was fair enough. He barely appeared for his second. I don't think anyone else on the list is that deserving but I might have gone with Moore as he did try with the whole Keesha AIDS story. @alwaysAMC Thanks to slick jones' cast list I was able to see that Nikki Rene played Tina. Not much on her, as you mentioned. Tap and a few Broadway listings (it doesn't help that a younger actress with a similar name is in a lot of roles). Nikki Rene: Credits, Bio, News & More | Broadway World https://onceonthisisland.fandom.com/wiki/Nikki_Rene Nikki Rene - IMDb
    • Thank you. That does ring a bell. I remember Theresa and Julian's drunk, giggly fake wedding (with Julian asking "Whassup?" to the minister). Was Bruce tricking the pair as a prank, or did somebody put him up to it? I especially liked Katherine recalling how dashing young Alistair was when he'd pick up Rachel for dates, and how she wished she could be her sister, then feeling guilty once Rachel had her boating accident ...
    • And Kevin Mambo beat Shemar Moore for those two Emmys. I chalk up the wins to the voters not wanting Jonathan Jackson to eventually end up with a five peat (he won 1995, 1998, 1999). These were the 1996 and 1997 Younger Actor races. 1996: Nathan Fillion, Jonathan Jackson, Kevin Mambo (winner), Shemar Moore, Joshua Morrow 1997: Steve Burton, Jonathan Jackson, Kevin Mambo (winner), Shemar Moore, Joshua Morrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy