Jump to content

The First Villain and Villainess on every soapopera.....


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Anyone who knows who the first Villain and Villainess/Bitches on every soapopera Past and Present where.

My Guesses

Days, Julie must have been the first Villainess on Days.

Edge Of The Night, Teresa Vetter i have heard was more or less the first female villainess on any soap, Played By Rebecca Sand.

Dark Shadows, Barnabas Collins, Burke Devlin.

ATWT, Susan is the only one i can think of back then.

Theresa Vetter from The Edge Of The Night

http://lavender.fortunecity.com//casino/403/teresa.html

Here is a list of the Top Ten Female Villainesses from The Edge of The Night

http://lavender.fortunecity.com//casino/403/female.html

Anyone knows the first real Villains and Villainesses/Bitches on every soap?......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Burke Devlin wasn't a villain. He was just trying to prove that Roger Collins had framed him for vehicular manslaughter. The first villains on DS were Matthew Morgan (who was the first murderous villain, anyhow, as he murdered Bill Malloy and tried to kill Victoria Winters) and Roger (to a certain extent). The first villainess was Laura Collins, a phoenix who was bent on consuming her son David in flames, put Elizabeth in a coma, and killed Dr. Peter Guthrie.

Ryan's Hope: Delia Reid Ryan was the first villainess. Mobster Nick Szabo was the first villain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I believe the first long term villian on any soap debuted in 1951 - 5 years before EON ever debuted. That was Meg Dale Harper on Love of Life. She was a real bad girl

Also Irene Barron would have been sort of a villianess. She made life a living hell for Joanne Barron in the first few years of Search For Tommorrow.

The first real villians would have been the mobsters that got involved with Meg on Love of Life in 1951 and 1952.

Then there would have been Harry Lane who was a big time villian on The Edge of Night in 1956.

The first really popular villianess was Claire Bannister Steele portrayed by Lesley Woods on Young Doctor Malone in 1958.

But no villianess was more popular than the debut of Lisa Miller on ATWT in 1960. Eileen Fulton became a superstar played the villianess. She is the one who made villians and villianesses popular.

As far as first ones on the 8 current shows and some other big shows:

AMC: Erica Kane and Phoebe Tyler were the first two villians/villianesses of the show

AW: Liz Matthews - a real lady to be reckoned with

ATWT: Lisa Miller Hughes was the first. The first real villian was most likely Michael Shea in the late 60's.

B&B: Stephanie of course

Days: Julie Olson and Kitty Horton

The Doctors: Kurt Van Allen

GH: Phil Brewer

GL: probably the guy that tried to steal Sara McIntyre's money in the late 60's or early 70's. Sorry I forgot his name.

OLTL: Dorian Cramer Lord, Victor Lord

Y&R: Katherine Chancellor & Jill Foster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IA. It's a good list, SteveFrame, but I hesitate labelling Erica and Lisa "villainesses". Anti-heroines? Definitely. Villainesses? I don't know.

Lee Gantry. But I think the argument could be made that Charlotte Waring Bauer, who came before Lee, was GL's first villainess. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They were villianesses in every sense of the word that Rachel or Julie were. They were conniving, ruthless, etc. just like any other villian or villianess of the day. Lisa was so hated by fans that they walk up on her in the streets and spit on her. One lady walked up on her and began hitting her with her purse. She eventually had to hire a body guard to travel with her for a few years.

As to the GL thing, I could not remember when Charlotte Waring came on. For some reason I was thinking in my mind she came after the Gantry guy (thanks for supplying his name).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Most fans rooted for them, though, in spite of themselves (same goes for Julie, although I'm a bit on-the-fence about Rachel). IMO, that's what separates the anti-heroines like Erica and Lisa from the more...garden-variety, arch villainesses, like GL's Annie Dutton, or AMC's Janet Green (the Kate Collins version of her, that is).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If you use that as a guideline then most of the villians today you would have to categorize as anti-heroes and heroines.

Fans today root for Stefano DiMera, Todd Manning, and so many others that are out and out villians.

As I said in my commentary Lisa was the first villianess to make villians popular. After that many of the villians/villianesses became popular with fans, but it didn't change the fact they were villians or villianesses.

And Julie was not all that popular until she began to change in finding love with Doug - that was around 1970. Susan Martin and Laura Spencer Horton were the 2 most popular on Days before that.

Here are definitions of both:

Anti-hero – Not necessarily a villain, an anti-hero is a character with villainous or generally negative behaviour and often advances selfish or ignoble goals but most often fights alongside the "good guys" or is considered a protagonist. The anti-hero may violate the law or the prevailing social standards, but may nevertheless have the audience's sympathy (and may be or become good-hearted). Sometimes, they may be heroes with noble goals but have villain-like or uncouth personal qualities. Often considered "grey" characters due to their moral ambiguity. Although the anti-hero may be the protagonist of the story, they generally show traits which are in contrast to those of the traditional hero, such as cowardice or greed.

A villain is an "evil" character in a story, whether an historical narrative or, especially, a work of fiction. The villain usually is the bad guy, the character who fights against the hero. A female villain is sometimes called a villainess. Random House Unabridged Dictionary defines villain as "a cruelly malicious person who is involved in or devoted to wickedness or crime; scoundrel; or a character in a play, novel, or the like, who constitutes an important evil agency in the plot.

Every definition I found for anti-hero said nothing about being popular with the audience but eliciting audience sympathy. Believe me Rachel, Julie, Erica and Lisa for many years even though popular did not elicit audience sympathy. They liked them but they did not feel sorry for them. It was not until around 1973 that Erica elicited any sympathy from audiences when she got sick after the abortion, but that was short-term. Lisa did not elicit any audience sympathy until she fell for Grant Colman and Joyce made life difficult for her. Julie's sympathy came along when they paired her with Doug and they had to fight to stay together.

I will agree with you that they were not the garden variety villianess but that was more of a credit to the writers who did not make them cardboards villians. They created special characters of them, but in the end I still think they fall into the villian category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If it came off that way I am sorry but I was trying to correct you just state my opinion on it. Sorry about that.

I think all the ones you mentioned have ranged through the years. They all started off as a villians, emerged as anti-heroines/heroes and then finally into heroine - which again was a tribute to great writing.

The sad fact is that the current round of bad writers that AMC has had in the last few years have emerged Erica back into anti-heroine mode when Agnes had pretty much moved her to heroine mode.

Back then writers worked to make distiguishable characters and not archetypes or cardboard characters. You would even see heroes like Bob Hughes have moments of weakness. But today the characters are not like that anymore.

They can't even make up their minds if they want Todd Manning to be rootable or not. One year he is played off as if we are supposed to be sorry for him and feel that he is changing and then the next year all of it is wiped away. It is sickening. They do the same thing with Carly Tenny on ATWT and Kendall & Greenlee on AMC. I say get a plan and stick with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
    • Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect! Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect!
    • Eve was one of those characters that had the "Jessie Brewer"role. They had heavy storyline, they burned through it and now they are there for support and a touchstone in the community (Marland wanted to give Jessie story, but I agree with Monty...she best served in her connecting role, and keeping that damn Amy Vining busy so she keeps her nose out of things) So charcters are important and why they should have kept characters like Bridget around (even as she is more volatiles then Eve) who didnt need a big storyline but could have been behind the bar making connections and expostion, but Rauch wanted JEVA/JEVA/JEVA and DRAMA (which to him meant a lot of yelling and stupidity.)
    • Why do I feel like (or remember possible

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) Mark Dante operated on Jeff? Also, I was under the impression that Jeff shot himself accidentally. In his drunken stupor he saw Rick and Monica together and he thought hevwas shooting at them.
    • A number of errors in the above article. You wonder how with all that research,how  they slipped through. I think they are conflating Women Alone with Lonely Women. I have never read anything of a serial called Women Alone. However,I am prepared to be proven wrong.   It seems Irna actually WAS interested in TV soaps as witnessed by These Are My Children airing in 1949 on NBC in the early days of TV.   I don't believe that was reluctance, rather simply good business sense as radio's dominance began to wane.   Inferring that was somehow connected to Irna who was off that show 10 years prior.   Again inferring that Phillips leaving 6 years prior had some connection to the eventual cancellation.     Again these two events are in fact one. Irna left ATWT only once in 1970 and returned in 72. She was not working on another P&G show at the time. So either she brought the ratings up or they dipped, depending on which above account you believe   Untrue. A World Apart debuted 5 years after she left AW. And AWA aired longer than a few months. Over a year in fact.   I believe Orin Tovrov was the writer. Irna was not involved in the creation of this show. And no mention of Masquerade an Irna serial  which was on air around this time.   TBD finished in 1962. As we see over and over, these inaccuracies are published and accepted as fact.
    • YES! While I objectively found the writing on RH (particularly during its first few years and then again in its final days) to be excellent, so many of the principle characters were unpleasant, and totally turned me off. I could never settle down and become emotionally involved with a group of people who grated on my nerves.
    • Ugh now we get a Emmerdale and Corrie crossover soon. ugh.. How desperate 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy