Jump to content

Coronation Street: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Carl, here's my requested thoughts.

I'm still not watching every episode, but there are definite positive changes that have taken place over the last few months. I love that they're committed to playing every beat to a story, and not just letting (most) things slide, or fizzle out, and moving quickly on to the next big plot. But, this is also part of the reason why I'm still not liking the show - they're still playing out the same storylines from last year, the very same ones that were part of the problem.

Day-to-day eps now feel and look much better, not messy or disjointed; Storylines flow naturally along - the one thing that EE sadly suck at.

There is still a certain dullness about a lot of characters, and a lack of varying archetypes, too. I'm hoping that now the horrendous Nick/Leanne/Peter/Carla quad is over, that all those characters can move into new stories that develop their positive qualities (I'd love to see the back of Nick for good, but unfortunately, that's not going to happen). David & Kylie are actually a good pairing, and I like that they're going to be filming in London for some special Easter episodes that will include returnees Jamie, Violet and Todd (3 characters I liked). I also liked James (Ken's grandson), and will happy to see him return that will hopefully conclude his very rushed story from last year.

But, there are a load of characters that have no direction, like Sophie & Sian - as a couple, they're never developed, Mary (who is really pointless), Julie, Tyrone, Kirk, Izzy & Gary, Chris & Maria (who has taken over Michelle's story w/ Frank), Tracy still doesn't serve much of a point, and Becky has been ruined.

Owen's a bit more tolerable since he's shown how manipulative and scheming he can be. I like Xin from what I've seen; it's nice seeing Tina interact with a female friend.

The farcical John plot still continues plodding along, now with Fiz at the deception helm. *Yawn* Why can't they just put this story out of its misery?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will be happy to see Todd again but his return story sounds...odd, from the spoilers. Collinson seems to like to try wacky comedy but I don't know if it's ever worked (I am still confused as to why they had Sally get together with her daughter's pornographer).

It will be nice to see Violet again, to make up for her exit story.

I was wondering what you thought of the world's most lackadaisal attempted rape. Why they would give this story to Maria I don't know, as Samia Smith can't do terror or drama (she is much better at breezy comedy and one-liners, or was, when the show gave her that). They apparently planned to do this story with Michelle but that also makes no sense to me because why would you give this type of story to a pregnant actress who lost a baby a few years ago? The whole story is so rushed and as with a lot of the show now I think it lacks energy.

I don't think Peter/Leanne will last long. The show choosing to reunite them the very same week they split up and have them deal with none of their issues seems telling. I just don't know what the options are. Carla/Peter probably, but I have never believed she loves him and it just seems like a lot of melodrama lifted from a 1943 women's picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't see it. But I've read similar thoughts to your own. I think they had this story in mind for Michelle before they found out she was pregnant. But, Kym Marsh took early maternity leave, so they handed it all over to Maria. If KM hadn't, they probably would've discussed it with her, and went from there; I don't see how that's a problem though, considering many actors have to act out scenes that may be too close to home in some way - just look at B&B giving Hunter Tylo the grieving mother story after her own son had died! Maria was the only logical solution, whether she's right for the part or not. I also think this shows how Michelle isn't needed, as they have Maria to play out Michelle-esque stories/scenes. So, why keep her Michelle on? Now that makes no sense to me.

I thought it was weird that they reunited them in the same ep. I don't see any chemistry in Peter/Carla, and I don't buy any of that relationship, especially the love angle.

I don't know why they didn't use Dr. Oliver as Sally's love interest, as she didn't necessarily have to be his patient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that it would have been better if the show hadn't given Kym Marsh any dramatic material during her pregnancy. (Frankly I wouldn't give her any dramatic material ever, since she can't act, but that's something else entirely).

I'm not entirely sure whether this story would have worked for anyone, but it makes no sense to me with Michelle or with Maria. It seems even more bizarre with Maria because they casually trashed many years of friendship between Maria and Audrey.

This seems like generic woman in peril, with a large dollop of "she was asking for it," which is sad. I still don't understand why Collinson has such a need to degrade female characters. But at the very least give the story to someone who can act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder if they are even going to use the doctor.

I think they wanted everyone to be shocked and amused that Sally was dating her daughter's pornographer, but I thought it made Sally look like a terrible mother and also made a joke of any idea that she was somehow "stronger" without Kevin. Strong doesn't = being with a man who lied to you and tried to get your daughter to get a boob job.

They always seem to want us to laugh at Rosie whether it's actually funny or not. Half the time they just have her yell her lines. The only one at this point in the family I find believable is Sophie, mostly because she's the only one they haven't turned into a ha ha shoutfest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

Chris Fountain sucks in his stomach for a photoshoot.

Please register in order to view this content

Meanwhile, Helen Flanagan is taking a break for 3 months but getting her own webseries as Rosie tries to become the new Katie Price (so sick of that story).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's bad marketing. He's attractive to a different group now. He's cuddly - there's nothing wrong with that. He's just not this ripped guy they keep selling him as, and he's also not any type of "jack the lad" heartbreaker either. The fact that Corrie is

tells me they are going to fail him as they have failed every single new character they have created in the last two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Probably, yes. Emmerdale at least had a few promising new characters. Corrie has had none. What baffles me is that when I see some fans at DS talk about new characters they're almost rattled off like a list, oh, just wait until _____ and ______ and ______ comes along. That kind of underscores how thin and ultimately irrelevant most of the new characters are. I'm still surprised sometimes at just how lethargically written most of their stories are and what transparent plot devices they are. The show did not even try to make any effort with the wretched Kylie or Xin, or the sleep-inducing "villains" Owen and Frank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Because you are posting these things like they are true facts.  And they aren't. But whatever, Donna, you will just keep doing you.   Most people actually are trying to talk about GH in this thread.  Not random twitter/facebook/internet rumors you bring here.  I am just wasting my time even responding.    
    • This is a common theme with long running actors and preposterous storylines. Firstly they may relish the chance to play something different after years as that charcter. Secondly, no matter how dumb the plot it keeps them frontburner and valued to the show and the audience. Thirdly, as VW stated in the end they don't have the power to dictate story and too much complaining can backfire and set them up in a negative light. Not a good position to be in with your employers. So they just buckle up and give it their all or act out the script till it's over.
    • Your use of the word "apparently" would need to include a source. Just your use of the word doesn't make it true or valid. Where would you get the idea that something has happened if you hadn't already received an indication from somewhere else, specifically a valid source (including Tabyana herself)? By using the word "apparently," you are implying this was mentioned somewhere, either in a publication or similar.
    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy