Jump to content

Love of Life Discussion Thread


Cat

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Thanks @DRW50! I have come to appreciate the layers of John Hess' writing in the past few years so watching a lot of early "Love of Life" plays out differently for me than it did in years past. I do think there is a sleek simplicity in all of this and a low level of relatable humor that adds to the scenes without breaking the dramatic tension by shifting the mood too far in the opposite direction. 

At first, I thought the obviously budget dictated decision to not show Meg's accident was glaring, but I now consider that it allows one to question what actually happened. Did Meg do this intentionally? Was it completely and accident? 

@Paul Raven You probably already knew, but Claire Labine had watched "Love of Life" in the 1950s when her children were young so she had seen Jean McBride's Meg so she was able to capture the essence of the character. In more recent years, I've noticed some writers seem to know a character's history rather than their personality which often makes decisions made by the characters under new writers have questionable motivations based on lack of true understanding of a character. "Love of Life" fans were lucky that Labine was able to bring the essence of Meg back based on first hand knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 994
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I think one of the issues with modern day soaps and 'good' characters is partly due to casting and partly due to writing.

Van is a good character.. too good to be true.. and that can be a difficult character to write and make interesting.  This is why casting is so important because the performer needs to add personality, humor, and other layers in order to make the audience like and root for the character.

Peggy McKay was pretty good with putting that spirit/humor into Van.\

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For the last two decades, very few shows have worked to really develop the characterization and relationships of new characters. While LOL might have a very black and white mindset for morality, those relationships are much murkier. Evans says he is for Van, not against Meg. That's a clear and important distinction. Also, there was that dynamic between Van, Paul, and Matt. I don't feel like there is a clear good guy or bad guy between the two men. Paul is overstepping by showing up and Matt is clearly peeved. Also, Van is tolerating those men because of her connection to both. Similary, her sisterly love for Meg sometimes causes her to support her sister when she shouldn't, but rarely at the sacrifice of her nephew. 

Nowadays, characters and stories are islands. I think there were some benefits to those tighter 15 minute shows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The nuance in those scenes surprised me. I assume Matt was being phased out and Paul was the man she was meant to be with, but both are decent figures, and you can see her connection with both. It was very refreshing compared to the usual angsty triangles, where later on you'd get a punch-up.

That and the Meg and Evans material, like when she calls him out on being old-fashioned and he admits it, make me see the intelligence in the writing that you mention.

I have been saying for years we need 15 minute shows again and I don't know why we aren't getting any. If Tiktok survives, some company would be a fool not to put up a soap. It's what the short attention span generation, with reports of them only being able to watch short videos and not reading, would need. And it makes sense, as 15 minute soaps can still be artforms. 

The other thing with this show compared to later soaps is that the "good" characters actually are good. In recent decades you have "good" characters committing cold blooded murder and this somehow being framed as righteous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks @DRW50!! I've never seen that one before, and I thought I'd seen all of the 15-minute LOLs out there.

Jean McBride's Meg really is one of the greatest early soap characters. Idk how the 50s audience took her, but I can never see her as "the bad sister" because she comes across so desperate and transparent in so many of her manipulations that you can't help but feel for her and hope that something works out for her at some point.

I love it when a soap builds its conflicts in unexpected ways. Obviously the Meg/Van dynamics are classic, but putting Beanie into the mix, angry at his mom for being the way she is but also resentful toward Aunt Van because, no matter what, even as she steps in to care for him, she never stops defending Meg and encouraging him to forgive her. Labine was a genius to bring Meg and Ben back in the 70s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I liked reading the summaries of 1974 to 1976/7 was that Meg and her two children Ben and Cal were driving the majority of the story.  It's a shame that Cal was phased out eventually because Ben and Cal were kind of like Val and Meg back in the 50s.  Ben seem more like Meg in terms of wanting money/being his own worst enemy while Cal seemed more like her aunt Van with her being more of a good girl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I've been rewatching the 50s episodes in order, just to get as full of an appreciation as I can for this era of the show, and I was curious about the opening title card. Sadly, the hotel in the background (the Savoy-Plaza) was demolished in the early 60s, but after reading about the statue, it makes sense that they chose to use it in the show's opening. It's a statue of Pomona, the Roman goddess of abundant fruitfulness, which I figure was chosen to represent Van's generosity with her friends and family.
screen-shot-2016-12-12-at-8-46-25-am.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Info about the LOL opening is a little murky but that opening shot was changed to a slo mo of a flower opening, possibly when the show went to a half hour.

But that was short lived and a new opening with a starry sky replaced it until the color episodes brought the flower in the window opening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WoST had a clip of the blooming flower opening, but I haven't seen it anywhere since the website shut down, not even a screenshot. I want to say 1957 is when they went from the statue to the flower to the starry sky, but the sky opening might've started in 1958 to coincide with the expansion to 30 minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I love everything I come across LOL. I was even able to find that one book with the story about Vanessa. I need that other book and it makes me sick that I can’t get my hands on it. I nearly was able too but he wasn’t shipping to my adress:( 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure if those are the same episodes or not, but the final week was uploaded by Chandler Hill Harben a number of years ago. I went back a month or two ago as I was trying to remember if there were any he had up that had been taken down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I’ve been enjoying the pace the show has taken recently. Things don’t languish as long as they have and if they are drawing something out, like Gio’s adoption, it’s hasn’t been as excruciating. Also, my nosey nature would appreciate less interaction with posters I have on ignore so I don’t have to click on “options”.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay...I'm just going to call it. Ambyr Michelle is the breakout star of this show with the young set hands down! There is no character like Eva that pulls my heart strings, and she's playing it perfectly. If Eva and Leslie are on, it's a good episode! If written properly, Eva and Kat's rivalry is one that could go on for YEARS. Of course, it's fun to speculate about who is really whom, but I could see them developing as frenemies after some time. They really need a guy to tussle over to amp it up. Tomas is pretty, but the actor has got to loosen up some in his scenes, I think. He is improving though. It would be good to introduce a new young man in that story for a foursome.  Martin and Smitty finally feel like a real couple to me, too. Hopefully, they locked them into four year contracts.
    • I'll be that guy and say I don't think TMG is a fool. This is a popular contract role on a year-round soap opera for a woman of a certain age (to say nothing of a woman of color). If I'm her I pull a Kimberlin Brown and ride this til the wheels fall off.
    • Tbf it's not unusual for a family when they are dealing with some bad news that changes a life to use song to give out hope.Especially black families. I personally had to deal with that very thing this weekend. Partly off putting, but at the same time, I did get the point and it gave me a bit of hope in the moment.      MM is definitely acting. But Smitty is just so passive. It could turn into quiet strength at some point, but for now...passive IMO. 
    • Am I remembering correctly that the Madison's lived in a Spanish revival-style house? I have a vague recollection of the fireplace looking especially Spanish in style. It is unusual that Montecello had so many architectural styles.  Obviously, that might occur IRL.  But, look at other east coast soaps and there is a definitive style that is throughout (because it was styled by a set decorator) regardless of the income of the occupants.
    • @kalbir MSW was a powerhouse for CBS. Angela Lansbury was a superb actress. In 1985, TV viewers were tiring of the primetime soaps and the like. People wanted storytelling and MSW was great at that and had great guest stars. Storytelling -- an amazing and novel concept. CBS Daytime by 1985 was beating ABC so CBS was on the upswing.
    • I'd say just the opposite - conflict means they will find out and then be at odds. For the limited amount of time people on this show have conflict (if they aren't named Nina or Ric, I guess).
    • Totes mcgoats (aka I agree). But, now the character needs to move forward.  Clyde's exit was 12/11/24.  It is May.  She and Chad have been on one date. I don't think they've slept together. And she was only planning on sticking around for a year.
    • That is one of the best insults I've heard in a long time.  I burst out laughing when Kat called Eva that.  LOL Their scenes, of course, were really good.  Colby and Ambyr have so much chemistry.  The only thing I'd change is Kat saying "you're dead to me."  That's a phrase usually said about someone you care about.  I would've preferred something like "You will never be my sister," or something similar to that.  Nice contrast at the end with both mothers/daughters:  Kat comforting/consoling her mother, and Eva being locked out by her mother.  Yeah, I wasn't a big of fan of the singing either, especially after your daughter's life has been destroyed.  What?  LOL And I also agree with those that thought Dana/Leslie's scenes with the Dupree's didn't feel right since Eva is not a Dupree....unless she is.  But as of right now, she's not. 
    • Trisha Mann-Grant, Ambyr Michelle, Sean Freeman are destined for bigger and better things. They need to move on as soon as their initial contracts are done.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy