Jump to content

2008 BRITISH Soap Awards Montage


DaytimeFan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Good question. Thinking about it, I can't actually remember what was going on when I last watched!

I stopped watching because things started to become stale. Characters were changing like the wind - the King brothers all switched personalities with each other (Good-guy Carl became Mr. Nasty; Middle bro Jimmy turned into Mr. Nice, while Evil Mathew took on Jimmy's role - all without any proper reasoning) - storylines were unrealistic (Jonny forgiving cheating Paul 5 minutes after he 'fessed up), dull, or non-existent for some; new characters were bland and boring (Ross Kirk, Lexi Nicholls), while decent characters (Rosemary) were being pushed out the door due to having "run their course".

TPTB had a dispute with Linda Thorson (Rosemary) about the direction of her character - she wasn't happy that she was being written in an out-of-character way - and decided to terminate her contract. Linda has been quite vocal about this. Saying that, I've just remembered the last episode I saw, which was Rosemary's funeral, where Mathew sadistically dug up her body with a JCB and crushed it in front of Grayson! Her exit was abrupt and the character was killed off screen, via suicide (something I believed she would never do). I thought it was all in bad taste and I stopped watching. I read a couple of months back that they've also axed Jonny, one of the few decent gay characters in Emmerdale, who had a lot of storyline potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think you've made me realise some of what I hate about the show and for the record, I had no idea that they did that tacky grave stuff. I remember the producer putting a spin on Rosemary's exit at the time and how it was "storyline dictated" but it just stank because I don't see more than five minutes a week and I knew very well that the character wouldn't top herself. My parents love the show but they didn't actually understand that Rosemary had even left until the suicide rubbish came through.

At least in the past with ludicrous stories such as Steph going mad there was a through line for the characters. Their actions made some kind of sense other than arbitrary flip flopping. Now I don't know who's good or bad or whatever and that's not because characters are written in complex shades of grey, God knows. They just don't make any sense. Not to mention that nothing ever seems to happen that isn't marred by panto-esque humour.

The only thing I will maintain is that the episode dealing with the death of Laurel's baby is in the top 5 soap episodes I've ever seen. I have never, ever been as moved by an episode as I was for that.

Enjoyed the bushfire promo btw. Susan Bower's being a little too overtly symbolic about clearing the dead wood but it's exciting stuff. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think I'm drawn to Emmerdale because it's not a typical British soap in that it's about richer people than the traditional working-class soap and because it has these awful over-the-top storylines. I would just like to see how the Brits represent the wealthy in TV. Why is that such a tabboo? And wasn't there a Wales-based soap about the rich and famous? Which was awful, BTW.

Was this show ever good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh Emmerdale used to be great back in the 90s when it was about the wealthy Tates. The difference is that it combined camp stories played absolutely straight with genuine humour instead of the strange panto thing they've got going on now.

Kim Tate is one of my favourite soap characters ever. She bashed her wheelchair bound stepson over the head, left him for dead and took off in a helicopter with her baby son (whom she'd previously sold to his real father for £1 million). Not to mention her "coming back from the dead" and scaring her ex-husband Frank into dying of a heart attack. She checked under his nose with a compact to see if he was breathing and then used it to touch up her makeup.

Not sure about the Welsh soap but I'd be interested to find out more. I know Howard's Way did wealth in the 80s and was dreadful. Revelations was about a wealthy family which I enjoyed. Then obviously there was Footballers' Wives. Other than that, Emmerdale is really the only British soap to consistently showcase wealth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, how much I love JamesF's posts! The only problem is that I have to squeeze them out of him with my incessant questions! :P

So now there's no soap that does these campy, over-the-top stories? At least, not well?

Oh, I hate Footballers' Wives, and I'm sure you do to. The delirious flood of narrative, terrible stories, cr*ppy dialogue, inexistent acting, Amber going to see the witch doctor to hex Tanya!! :lol: :lol:

And I made a mistake, it's not Welsh, it's Cornish - Echo Beach, which you also hated if I remember correctly. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Thanks Ben and Danni.

So Tanya buried Max alive!! :o You know I'll need to see what hapens next! LOL So please, keep them coming! :D Is there a youtube channel where I can watch new episodes?

I really like stories that last for a very long time......stories where things lead to something else and that you can trace back the root of the story to a year or two ago. That's awesome storytelling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, the chick who was running the show from 2005-2007, was Kathleen Beedles. Anita Turner took over the role of Exec Producer sometime this year, and really, her stories aren't any better... maybe worse. The Bland & the Boring are still around harvesting up airtime. The ratings over recent months have also reflected this; the show now fluctuates between 5.8 and 7.0. It's not good, but then ITV1 really don't seem to care.

Ooh question: The Nets over here take the audience share over the ratings on most occasions. If the rating figures are low, but the show garners a high audience share, then the programme is classed a hit. Is that the same in the US? Do you have audience shares, as I don't think Toups posts any when he adds the weekly ratings?

Because I'm not watching, I missed that episode. Apparently though, people weren't happy with the baby switch revelation afterwards - as it tainted the cot death story - even though it had been planned for a year. Was the baby switch element really needed?

The bushfire eps are awesome. Friday's was really suspenseful, with Karl and Susan, lost, running away from the fire. I'm pretty pleased with her work so far. Did you read the interview she did for NeighboursFans.com? The only element about her, is that she doesn't seem to be interested in learning about Paul's history, while at the same time, stating that continuity is of the utmost importance - major contradiction! I thought it was testament to a writers credibility to actually take the time to learn about the show, and all it's characters.

That's exactly why I loved Emmerale - because of it managed to combine the ultra rich, with the mega poor. Somewhere recently, the lines have become blurred, and the rich no longer have their trademark characteristics, and the poor are just, well, dirty. Lady Tara and the Tate's wouldn't be seen dead fighting over garbage contracts - the term rubbish plot, was taken a little too seriously with that one!

I wouldn't say it's a taboo, more of a combination of culture, and trashiness. Culture wise, this is one of the claring differences between the UK and US - in the latter, you guys love to look up and strive to have the success and power that comes from having money; while over here, the UK has always been about celebrating the working class. The trashiness angle comes from shows like Footballers' Wive$, and the recent drama, Rock Rivals, where the rich are always portrayed as OTT, trashy and psychotic. This type of portrayal has dented anyone else from taking on the challenge of portraying them in a realistic, non-trashy way. That and the fact that American's do it better.

I use to love Emmerdale when I was at school. It was the show that no one dared admit they watched. Like, James said, Kim Tate was awesome. From the cottage fire that claimed her lover, Dave, to her faking her death, and employing Kim clones to trick Frank (how very Days of Our Lives :D ), and scaring him into a heart attack, to whacking wheel chair-bound step-son Chris over the head with a paper weight and fleeing in a chopper, were all classic moments.

Lady Tara Oakwell was another awesome bitch, who liked to get down and dirty (in every way possible); The Charity/Chris/Zoe triangle and Chris' murder were gripping and shocking (Charity bedding both brother *and* sister); Zoe's lesbianism, and decent into schizophrenia were all well handled and acted, who had one the most memorable exits when she blew up Home Farm. Psycho Graham was also great - He transformed Rachel into his murdered wife, and then pushed her over a cliff, who then seduced her best friend Kathy, nearly killing her by driving over said cliff! Even the whole Bernice/Carlos/Nicola triangle was good (I remember it was very similar to a story from either B&B, Days or Beach at the time - I forget which soap), Louse's stalker who turned out to be her boyfriend Ray; and the infamous plane crash of '93, all had something that the show has now lost.

Ah, the memories.

Footballers' Wive$ was horrible. There was never any follow up to the season cliffhangers, and characters vanished without any explanation. The acting and stories was worse than Passions - applying fake tan to a baby just so it could look "darker", so the baby switch could be revealed! Purleeez! :rolleyes:

Echo Beach was a disaster. The show didn't no whether it was a satire, or a serious drama. I think it was supposed to be about the middle class, more than anything else.

I would say Hollyoaks is the closest you'll get to the campy OTT-ness. I don't watch it, but from what I've heard, a certain character is going to fake his death, and switch identities with a dead corpse that they stumble upon. Oh, and I think they're doing the first case of Dissociative Identity Disorder (but don't quote me on that!).

Night And Day was always outlandish, and campy and fun. It's such a shame that ITV never gave it a decent chance.

There doesn't seem to be anyone uploading regular episodes. Maybe it has something to do with BBC's iPlayer, where recent eps are uploaded. I'll keep an eye out for anymore recent stuff surrounding that story.

I love stories that last for ages and spin out into different directions. The only problem that can arise from this kind of storytelling, is the payoff might not live up to the expectations that the storyline has set.

:lol:

I couldn't help but laugh at that. It's like you were asking: 'What the hell are you doing here?' So random. So Sylph. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @Toups Tyler Topits listed in alpha order with the breakdown writers 5/12 Monday episode. O'Connor still listed as both breakdown and script writer. Kreizman wrote today's script.
    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy