Jump to content

ATWT: Discussion for the week of June 9 - 13


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I don't think Ali's over the top in wanting Chris fired. Chris has proven he thinks nothing of using his influence to deep-six Ali. He got her reassigned on nothing more than a whim. While I love the family dynamics of the story...I wish the story had progressed a little slower. Chris has turned overnight, and a longer string of incidents would really give some depth to the issue. Basing it on her dismissal from the nursing program is weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No one wants to discuss today's show? Eh...don't really blame you. I missed some of it due to a news conference, but what I did see was okay, but seemed like an episode of the Twilight Zone. I saw Carly (who looks gorgeous just out of bed in the morning, btw, so much so it's criminal..) let Holden grab her ass for as long as he wanted. I missed the pukeworthy faux-accidents, but thanks to the all-inclusive previews from last week, I saw the gist of them anyway...nothing Pissy does is ever subtle, is it? Apparently, Holden has never been around anyone as hot as Carly (who pays attention to him anyway) in a month of Sundays. And don't get me started on the slo-mo fade out kiss "cliffhanger". Besides the fact Holden looked like FatherTime, considering he's fathered half of Oakdale, his lines are really, really lame. Next he'll be gazing at his horse and complimenting Carly's shiny coat and mane. :rolleyes:

The one moment of Paul showing compassion and concern for another human being, and Sophie uses it to nail him to the wall. There's some kind of poetic justice there, and frankly, he deserves it about ten times over for the way he's treated every woman in his life. Sophie suddenly gets a rewrite, looks like a crack whore and shows mad skillz for manipulating and "holding all the cards". Yeah...whatever. If someone got to stick it to Paul...why, oh why, couldn't it have been Rosanna? And seriously, Meg on a mission to save her man...*snort*

Jack/Janet...boy, if Janet thinks Katie on a tear is frightening and territorial, you'd think crossing the threshold at Carly's house would have sent out Level Orange Alerts in her manipulative little brain. And I really don't get WTF she thought she was doing. Or why she didn't realize Parker was Jack's son. I could have sworn she met them together once, but I could be wrong. She knew Jack was Brad's brother, she knew Parker was Lib's "cousin"...but she didn't put the two together?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The previews for next week look really good. Especially the Noah and Luke stuff. Luke is right. So far he's the one who's been pushing for them to be together. Its time for Noah to take some steps and fight for him. If they are truly meant to be together.

Loved the Sophie/Meg and Paul/Sophie scenes. She looked really vulnerable in both (Sophie that is).

Holden + Carly = Interesting. I'll give them that. IF not for the kids I'd be ALL for it.

Parker + Liberty = :wub:

Sseriously though my heart was breaking for poor Parker.

Janet is hilarious. Julie Pinson is fabulous in this role and the character is full of life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seriously that is so many kinds of nasty that it's sickening. WTF are Pissant and company smoking, I bet they found McTavish's and B&E's crackpipes ::barf::

I guess since viewers didn't drink the "Katie is love" kool-aid and accept Carly being thrown under a bus for the fluffball, they're going a different route.

This is the kind of ish AMC does :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Has anyone ever posted January and February 1974? I can't find them in the 'Look Back to 75' thread. Thanks.
    • Did January and February 1974 DSN ever get posted? I can't seem to find it in this thread.
    • I agree. Especially after SilkPress got back to her apartment and started to mock Nicole. Her dislike for Nicole and seeing her as a threat to her getting Teddy Bear is growing worse. So I could see her pulling a kidnapping on Nicole at some point. If anything she was going there to poke the bear and got pressed (pun unintended) when the bear gathered her.   Completely understandable. 
    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy