Jump to content

Fringe: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well I watched ep 2 of Fringe tonight and I'm even more confused about the show now...

My main complaint/confusion was it felt an uneasy mix to me--half of it was a graphic serial killer type story that I felt like we'd already seen too much of on TV (Criminal Minds and the like has so many shots of women being tortured to death already that I really didn't need to see it on another show), and then that was mixed with the more mythology/continuing storyline aspect--and the way the two stories met (ie the killer was doing the killings for slightly supernatural reasons) felt forced to me.

I admit my view could be partly coloured that I caught the episode with a friend who found the scenes of women being picked up for sex and then paralyzed and cut into a bit much to handle on a 9pm network show--but I felt basically the same way (it's funny to be nostalgic of stuff like X Files but it just didn't feel as exploitive from what I remember, in similar stories--while being scarier). It also is weird--now that Abrams has said admitted that the show takes place in a sort of bizarro world I find the tone of the whole thing all the harder to grasp. On one hand you had the scenes in the big business "evil corporation" which I enjoyed, and the character interaction which I also, mostly, enjoyed (yes even Josh Jackson singing Row Row Row Your Boat) and then on the other you had the serial killer scenes which were largely filmed the way they'd be on a "realistic" cop show, which was tied into the freaky X Files rapid aging thing. I don't think it all balanced out at all. Maybe if the cop type scenes had a bit more of the Alias camp/fun factor going for them that Abrams did so well there--here they're very dark and maybe too bleak I felt--which doens't go ell with having a big bossy villainess with a robotic arm (I love her though).

Already I get a sense that Abrams and all are working hard to live up to their word of making the mythology and serial aspects not too pervasive so that newbies can still enjoye the episodes--but again the balance didn't work for me in this episode--I still had to explain all the weird comments about her old partner, the corporation, etc to my friend who missed the pilot and, frankly, I found them the mor einteresting aspect of the show. Since we didn't have enough time with the serial killer story the end where his plight was almost meant to be bathed in pathos jus came off very poor and a big "who cares" (so his father made him do all those sexual killings, for YEARS, out of love and he NEVER wanted to? ok....) Again that part of the story probably woulda bugged me less if it had been fleshed out more (though on the other hand, as I said I don't have much patience to watch another show focusing on the torture killings of female victims no matter how complex the story is).

I think the show might have to decide quickly what fanbase it wants to please and stick to that direction more. I did find the final *flash* shot (were those three clones of the Josh Jackson character? Something else?) compelling despite myself... Anyway it was just episode two, I still like some of the characters, and some more of the actors and a lot of the style so am sticking with it...

E

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One thing I'm wondering is if every oddity they come across is going to be something that, wonder of wonders, miracle of miracles, Dr. Bishop once experimented with. Granted, it's only the second show but I think it would be a cop-out if they used that approach in every show.

I'm not sure if the last scene was of clones of Peter or someone else....if it was meant to tie into that episode or if it was a preview of next week before the preview, you know, like how they used to do at the end of Quantum Leap when Sam leaped into the next life and went "Oh, boy!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought it was connected with the Dr talking about the medical history of his son? And yeah to have the second episode again be connected to him struck me as a bit forced... I sound so down on it--the serial killer story--which felt to me typical, uneedingly graphic and then wasn't even really explained or focused enough to make it interesting really put me off--but I liked enough about the show that I'm definetly gonna keep watching... for now.

I do kinda wonder if JJ Abrams is shooting himself in the foot trying this new "less mythology, more episode of the week" technique, when from Felicity, Alias to Lost that's always been his *appeal* (even if he is right that sometimes it truns people off how complex it gets). We'll see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm hanging in there for now, too, but so far, the "set up" has been too convenient...Dr. Bishop being so familiar and involved with both anomalies, the big corporation with a boss who likes the FBI agent and gives her whatever she asks for. It's like they have too many built-in answers and "way outs."

I guess we'll see how the episodic approach goes. Of the shows you mentioned, I only had watched Lost and I gave that up after Season 2, not really because of the mythology, moreso a combination of long hiatus, new characters, not really having much of an attachment to regular characters anyway, etc. And in that show's case, if you do miss something, it affects your being able to pick up on later shows so it makes a return that much less inviting. Basically, I just stopped being interested. Maybe the fact that this show seems less serialized may help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well as I said earlier the very whole basic setup of the whole thing--that Josh Jackson HAS to be there because his father can only be released from the mental asylum, or even INTERVIEWED by the FBI with his permission and presence makes SO little sense, I can't even think about it. (why would an all powerful government, who locked him up, not eb allowed to interview him to find out about a deadly plague killing hundreds of people in the pilot??) But i guess that's partly what Abrams means when he says the show takes place in a completely fictional wacky world--still half the show is done so "real world" that it's hard, for me anyway, to change my mind back and forth. (if that makes any sense). Alias--and this show really feels like Alias meets X Files to me--was completely wacky--and kinda lost me near the end, but it introduced all the silly rimbaldi, etc, stuff over many episodes and always had a more fun/camp style to it anyway that made that all easier to swallow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I'm so happy that the House lead in help Fringe's ratings. :)

I thought it was very cool how they extracted the memory from the eyeball. LOL

I don't think the last scene had anything to with Peter. I think he was just a teaser for next week's episode.

I like that the show is 50 minutes long with only 10 minutes of commercials, while most primetime shows are like 42 minutes long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah will that last longer? I noticed the commercial breaks were VERY short (I usually know I have enough time to make tea or a drink during commercials and this time I'd have to rush back cuz I'd hear it starting lol) I still don't think it was a teaser :P

The memory eyeball thing I found stupid just cuz it's been overused SOO much--though crediting it to Verne was a first for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Caught up with ep 3 of Fringe... I won't post one of my long rambly reviews cuz there's not much to say, and I don't feel like it ;D But... I liked it much more than last week's. While maybe too similar to the pilot's "pattern plot", the "pattern plot" this week was more interesting than last week's and felt WAY more integrated with the characters and continuing story elements to me. A few quibbles--it looks like every case IS going to be tied into the professor some how which seems silly... Some of the humour just came off as kinda dumb to me (the clueless students knocking and interupting a potentially gory scene, etc). And this is prob my fault but I'm already confused--we got a name (John someone) for the body in the weird chamber at the end, in the "Evil Corporations" place (this is the room we had a quick flash to last week)--but I still don't remember names and wasn't sure if we were meant to recognize that name or not (was it her dead original partner?). Oh well, it wouldn't be the first time a pretty obvious clue completely misses me by on a JJ Abrams show (this was the first ep so far that he didn't help write too...)

ALso I appreciate that for some reason, so far, Fox is letting the episodes run to around 50 minutes--VERY quick commercial breaks. I wonder if sponsors are paying more, if this will last, or what that's about--I can't think of any other current network tv show with that priviledge.

E

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Yes, John Scott (Mark Valley) is the FBI agent, and Agent Dunham's boyfriend from the pilot.

Dollhouse is going to have less commercials too.

Hmm.....so Massive Dynamics is keeping an eye on Agent Dunham. I wonder why they want her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy