Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

IA about the grouping.

I don't think the title is a big deal because I've seen titles that refer to Americans when the story is not about all Americans. I don't think people generally think any reference to a group in a title is all encompassing. The main issue, for me, is that this seems to happen quite a bit at Fox News. It may be that not everyone is guilty of it but from different references that I've seen to specific individuals employed by that station, it's no longer shocking for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

(1) CNN and MSNBC are truly fair and balanced not liberal or just Democratic, not like a lot of the GOP lie and say anything but conservative news sources are Liberal!

(2) neo-conservative------is a far,far right conservative, in other words very,very conservative, and almost fanatically religious.

Yes that's why Faux News has has higher ratings, because its the GOP mouthpiece where the GOP can tune in without much Democratic slant in the reporting.

CNN polls are scientific. Moreso than Faux News, who are NOT honest whatsoever----they should know most of their viewers are neo-cons just like themselves and that's who's gonna respond to their damned polls. Why would they want polls to make their candidates McCain/Palin look bad? I told you what a neo-conservative above, but I am pretty certain you already knew that and were just being snide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

First of all, I agree that FOX News is biased in favor of the Republicans.

However, you are completely delusional, Mulder, if you believe that MSNBC is a non-biased network: that entire network is centered around Keith Olberman and his far left opinions.

And, while I know that all liberals hate Bill O'Reilly with a passion, he's got one huge plus that Olberman does not have: O'Reilly frequently features guests on his show who disagree with him. By contrast, Olberman never invites guests on his show who disagree with him.

And, I'll give FOX News another plus over MSNBC as well: that network has never had biased folks like O'Reilly and Sean Hannity anchor election night coverage. On the other hand, MSNBC used to frequently have Olberman and Chris Matthews (who is another die-hard Obama supporter) anchor their network's official election night coverage. In fact, because the entire credibility of NBC News has taken such a huge hit, executives recently made the decision to ban Olberman and Matthews from anchoring on future election nights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to agree that MSNBC is as biased as Fox. CNN generally is pretty unbiased. I don't like the partisan hacks arguing all the time, but at least I can generally tell who the news person is. You know, on a tangent, Lou Dobbs annoys me to no end. He just blusters. He's equal opportunity when he blusters, but he does bluster. He's just become a joke with his daily righteous (or self-righteous) outrage.

As far as Faux having one thing on MSNBC in that it doesn't have its columnist anchoring the news, I disagree. Last night Greta, who should be handing out bumper stickers for McCain/Palin, was anchoring the post debate coverage. Frank Luntz was interviewing uncommitted voters. Also, what is that network doing giving the Obama interview to Bill O'Reilly? I don't know that he welcomes people with an opposite opinion. He just yells at them and doesn't let them have a word in edgewise. No, in my opinion, MSNBC and Fox are equally as bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

CM a Obama supporter.

Is this the same CM who said Obama was an elitist because he wore sunglasses? Yeah, that sounds like support.

Oh, and Fox News, is this the same network where Neil Cavuto recently said that selling mortgages to minorities was crazy, and thereason why we were in this financial mess?

Mulder maybe a bit passionate, but his point is taken. When I no longer hear the conservative ass-kissing on FN that I hear, and the outright lies and racist, sexist, homophobic BS that many on that network spew, then I'll start watching it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As an outsider I watched the debate and I do belive that Obama won the debate.

McCain at one stage pretty much said that the republicans were alousy Govt. He said that Iran had a lousy economy, because they had a lousy Govt and considing the Economy in the US at the moment I really wonder what he was saying.

While he was speaking I kept on thinking OMG that is Bush speaking.

There a lot of biased people that work in the media and in all honesty I think that they should leave the bias at the front door when they are at work. If they are a political reporter or such they should give equal time to all parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't consider a lot of what goes on on Fox, MSNBC, CNN as news reporting. Usually when I watch, I know that the show is biased or slanted to the hosts opinion. I have issues with news reporters who let their biases show. That was the issue with Matthews and Olberman during the convention. I also don't agree with the "liberal media" stuff. I don't see it. Sometimes things get reported that we don't like or don't agree with. I don't think it means it is necessarily untrue. I believe reporters take pride in their work and give us their best efforts. But since we are human, mistakes can be made.

Remember these shows on MSNBC, Fox etc, are commentaries. I see them as entertainment value. These people express opinions that have no greater value than our own. We just don't make our living by expressing ours. Everyone of us who come to this board express our opinions and research the facts just like they do.

Ultimately, we make up our own minds and vote our own choice. That's what it's all about. Think back to the days before"cable news" and all the pundits. Since this is their job, don't you think the have a vested interest in maaintaining a close exciting election season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know you guys are discussing which news program is the least biased when covering the election stuff. I'll tell you all: I watch KERA, public television.

They covered both conventions, and you got to hear every speaker without the commentators cutting up the program. I watched the debate on that station as well and it was great. After it's over, they do have their analysts ( or whatever) weigh in on the whole thing, but there is no clear right-winger or liberal-- they just give it to you straight. If there were no KERA, I'd just find clips of the stuff online. I just need the facts (I don't need opinion masquerading as fact).

I can't take the MSM-- they make me sick to my stomach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since I don't watch Fox News I do not know how unbiased their actual news coverage is and how much of their programming includes shows with hosts. Some of the things with which people took issue seems to have happened during their news broadcasts.

MSNBC's news broadcasts are basically the same as the major networks' broadcasts. They have three shows with biased anchors and I don't know about Chris Matthews but neither Keith Olbermann or Rachel Maddox pretend to be unbiased. Chris Matthews seems to blow in the wind and his fascination with Obama as a candidate doesn't necessarily translate into any support of Obama. He's in love with thinking up things that Obama should do and fantasy campaign managing.

David Gregory anchors their fourth show and if he shows any bias at all then it's a conservative one. So basically MSNBC devotes six hours to shows with a liberal bias since each of the biased hosts' shows are aired for one hour each and then rebroadcast. David Gregory's show is only on once and MSNBC airs three hours of the conservative biased show hosted by Joe Scarborough.

Keith Olbermann doesn't necessarily have all liberals on his show because some of his guests are reporters who have not professed any political party allegiance. His show is structured in such a way that he basically has all of his guests on to support whatever point he is making.

Prior to adding Rachel Maddow's show a few weeks ago it was really just Matthews and Olbermann and the liberal label comes from Olbermann and his one hour show that is repeated. Considering that there were 20 hours and now 18 of non liberal biased shows, I don't consider MSNBC liberal at all.....just the actual 2-3 people that fall into that category.

I don't know that I care whether or not the person hosting a pre or post debate show is biased or not....the same for the convention coverage. I don't expect that when these people are giving their opinions on the debates that they are being unbiased since it is their opinion. Now when people are reporting actual news or something passing as news, then they need to present it in an unbiased manner since I do not need to know whether or not they think a person that's been arrested is guilty or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This group is unbelievable and I am so thankful for all of the efforts made to get episodes that we all love into the vault. Thank you.
    • It's convoluted but the CBS soaps that were still on the air in the 2000s are all in the same universe because of Sheila Carter appearing on Another World as an alias named Shelly Clark who hated some unnamed characters that matched Eric and to Stephanie's description. In the 60s Mike Bauer from Guiding Light crossed over to Another World which linked their universes. Cass also appeared on Guiding Light. Now if the Sheila Carter connection is counted as just parody and not a crossover there is still a connection due to Emily Stewart appearing on Y&R looking for Alison.  
    • Pete T Rich article undated from Berkshire Style website According to wikipedia All My Children Script Writer: 1994 - 1996 Days of Our Lives Script Writer: 1993, October 4, 2011 – July 27, 2012 Guiding Light Script Writer: 1984 - 1993, 1997–1999 Passions Script Writer: 1999 - 2008 Santa Barbara Script Writer: 1993 Welcome to the Soaps by Joseph Montebello Before there were miniseries and weekly comedy hours, there were soap operas. Those wonderful half-hour segments that came on every day, five days a week and captured the hearts of women and men alike. And if you are as old as I am, you will remember soaps on the radio. Every day I would arrive home from school and find my mother absorbed in the trials and tribulations of Backstage Wife or Stella Dallas or Lorenzo Jones. I knew enough to go quietly to my room as my mother sat totally absorbed in the dialogue. Thanks to writers such as Pete Rich, television soap operas reigned supreme for many many years and some of the memorable characters he wrote for are still remembered fondly. Born in Atlanta, Rich moved to New York after college with the dream of becoming a comedy writer. “My friend Gail Lawrence and I were in this together,” he said, “and we had an interview with a man at ABC comedy development. He told us that one had to live in Los Angeles in order to write comedy for television. So off we went, only to discover that Bob Hope was looking for writers.” In the category of “too good to be true,” Rich and his friend did, indeed, get a job writing for Hope and, at 25 years old, they were the youngest writers he had ever employed. Unfortunately, a writers’ strike brought everything to a halt, so Rich and Lawrence moved back to New York. As luck would have it, the man from ABC who had encouraged them was now at NBC, and was looking for writers for a soap called The Doctors. “In the ’80s, when television soap operas were in their prime, they had a captive audience of housewives and college kids,” said Rich. “The shows got huge ratings and, compared to prime time shows, they were cheap to produce. The profits were staggering and it was rumored that daytime paid for prime time.” That was the beginning of Rich’s stellar career in the soaps which lasted almost 30 years. He will share his favorite memories of life on the soaps at the Women’s Forum, at the Litchfield Community Center Thursday, March 2nd, at 2:30 PM. In addition to The Doctors, he penned scripts for Guiding Light, listed in Guinness World Records as the longest-running drama in television in American history—it was broadcast on CBS for 57 years—All My Children; Days of Our Lives; Santa Barbara, and Passions, Rich’s favorite show. His talent was acknowledged with six Daytime Emmy Awards and two awards from the Writers Guild of America. With such a stellar career, Rich has written many classic scenes and memorable dialogue and being asked to mention just one is like asking a mother to choose her favorite child. “Soaps opera lovers may remember what is considered one of the classic moments of daytime television when Reva Shayne on Guiding Light took off her clothes in a public fountain and baptized herself “the Slut of Springfield” to her crippled boyfriend, Josh. The speech went on for about five minutes as Reva basically had a meltdown. Actress Kim Zimmer won an Emmy for her acting and the episode itself received an Emmy as well. In true soap fashion, after Reva was taken home, she woke up in bed to find Josh watching her from his wheelchair. They made love, she cured his paralysis and made it rain–so potent a woman was she.” In their prime, soap operas managed to combine reality with incredibly convoluted plots and character studies. Where else could one find tortured men and women who fell in love, suffered infidelities, murder, lust, mysteries, lies, and secrets? “I think the days of soaps are really behind us,” said Rich. “The Internet has allowed everyone access to everything at anytime. And life has become so fast-paced that few people have five afternoon hours a week to devote to a show. Plus, reality TV, You Tube, and social media all entertain people in a customized way. Today what’s on the news is more outrageous and shocking than any soap ever was.” But we all have memories of those days when soaps held us rapt for that magical hour every day. Rich retired from writing for television and now spends his time decorating houses, designing gardens and writing fiction for fun.
    • I found the ATWT reference to be cleverly done and I enjoyed it. I thought this was another great episode. I'm starting to love Jacob and Naomi as the grounded good guys. June has brought the best out of both of them and both of them have made Derek more bearable.
    • I'm glad she got to Jamey fast and the issue was corrected. I wasn't sure if somebody had hacked his account or not, but turns out it was just an error.  Based on the 6:03 time stamp of his tweet, I only had told her about it 18 minutes before-hand, so that was certainly a quick response by both!
    •   a correction was just issued  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I did roll my eyes because I hate it when soaps refer to other soaps as soaps. I'd like to think that all soaps belong in the same universe. I hated when GL did it pertaining to Y&R during the Dolly clone story. I hated it today on BTG.  Plus, it was a stupid throwaway line that made no sense. OMG. The breakdown writer and script writer knew Tamara Tunie was Jessica on ATWT. What do they want for it? A cookie? 
    • Eva just so happened to be at the casino the night of the accident? How convenient and this feels like something they just thought up when they should have established that she liked to gamble as a hobby at some point before last week   LOL at that ATWT reference. June had me going
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy