Jump to content

Barack Obama Elected President!


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

LOL not as many as other people in the campaign did ;)...I also did not get a whole lot of "yes" votes in Texas. Most of them hung up early. Why hang up on me? ;)

I am going to make calls to Pennsylvania for BOTH Obama and Hillary....hey I love them both so I got to help both of them out ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hey Kwing...you know I love talking politics with you so here it goes ;). I have to agree that a lot of Obama is talking with regards to policy but not enough emphasis on how he will go about bringing that policy into The White House. It is clear that Hillary is putting forth her ideas, giving specifics, while Obama is touting the "change" card a whole lot. Now Obama has substance in him, at least in my opinion. To me, he has been a welcome addition for the Democrats in the U.S. Senate as well as basically a breath of fresh air. I was inspired by his speech at the 2004 Democrat National Convention where he became famous...it only got better once he entered the U.S. Senate.

I just like both Hillary and Obama a lot and am now volunteering to help both of them in upcoming states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are right, he is a great spokesman for the DNC and he makes great speeches.

But there is NO substance.

He has nothing to go on. Except his tired old "A Change is a coming". Which is pretty pathetic. Every candidate talks about change, and when every candidate gets to office, nothing changes.

Why is he different? Because he made one or two good speeches? What is his record? Why is he afraid to talk to the National Media?

Clinton has been getting the shaft. I honestly feel bad for her, and you know I do not like her one bit. She has, to me, become way more likeable as a person and a candidate and to be honest, I would rather see her in the White House than Do Nothing Obama.

The Dem party is in chaos though.

They always want all votes counted, but now they don't want Michigan and Florida counted because they moved up their primary....BOOO HOOO. Count the votes.

But what is funny about this...the same party that brought about this mess in MI and FL also has that whole superdelegate mess.

Barack does not want MI and FL counted because its wrong, but he thinks that all SuperDelegets should automatically vote for him....thats ironic.

Clinton is only 100 some delegates behind.

Anyone find it interesting that the media was all over Huckabee and him standing his ground, supporting his continued run when he had NO chance? But Hillary who is only a hundred or so delegates behind is made out to look like world war 3 because she wants to stay and fight, and rightfully so? Bias? I think so.

And to whomever cried about Rush urging Repubs to vote for Hilary...he may think Hil would be easier to beat, I think otherwise. America if finally waking up from their Obama induced sleep and seeing that he really has nothing but words....thats it.

But, if it was wrong for Rush to urge Repubs to vote for Hillary, was it wrong for the Dem party to call on Repubs to vote for Romney because they were afraid of McCain??? Because that happened, but you do not seem upset about that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It shouldn'e be that hard of a choice bro.

Any candidate that pissed off the biggest portion of his base is worth voting for. Why? Because they WILL work with both sides, like they always have.

You do not need a Liberal or a Conservative as President you need a centrist or a moderate. Plain and simple.

The left and the right cause too much hate....us centrists and moderates know what it takes to bring about change..and change starts by working together...not against.

Obama does not know foreign policy at all, he already said he would attack Pakistan...you are right , not a hard choice there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Getting people to the polls is not the mark of a great or competent leader. On that logic, Karl Rove should run for President.

BTW, I disagree that Obama lacks substance. The trouble is that his substance amounts to the same stale class politics that his party have been been pimping for years. He claims to be a bridge builder yet his voting record is the most left-wing of anyone in the Senate. And he rails against 'special interests' yet (unlike McCain) has shown no courage to face down the interest groups in his own party. Rhetoric aside, there's no evidence to suggest Obama would be a uniting/bi-partisan type leader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not at all, given the circumstances he clearly said he would attack Pakistan under. Let's tell it all if we're going to tell it. Working with the Republicans is a necessary evil, but what would be his inspiration to do so? They hate science, love war, claim no fiscal responsibility, promote bigotry. Because Obama isn't exactly what some bargained for as a Democrat, why would anyone completely change their values and adopt THOSE instead? Obama isn't going to fall in line with tactics like that, and I personally see a lack of patriotism when the GOP is considered a better alternative to him after what they've done for 7 years and still plan to do. And if Clinton is so much better at bipartisanship then why is her health care mission tainted by shutting out conservatives in the 90's? She talks about how Republicans derailed her efforts, but not her own contribution to the failure, which Obama pointed out in the last debate. She touts the successes of an administration she was neither elected into or appointed to a cabinet position in. Then she has the nerve to suggest that he can't provide national security, when she helped authorize a war that has depleted the morale and resources of the armed forces, and helped to fund it every time Bush wanted to. How can she not see that those decisions compromised our readiness for war breaking out here? It's the same as Republicans making no connection between the war and the horrid economy. As far as speeches, if they're such a problem for her then she should shut up until she's in the oval office and implementing those solutions she's fond of. Is Obama supposed to pull us out of Iraq on the campaign trail?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh. So because you don't agree with some of his points, BRO, they are laughable.

Amazing how he generalizes republicans.....but you NEVER do that to democrats (Which you did in one of your previous posts).

It's nice to see that repsect others opinions. I guess now you'll tell me you're not a republican but a fair minded person (If I had a nickel for every time I've heard that one)......

And, on most republicans n that party, Stenbeck may have it right. It's that party that is out of touch. Fiscal conservatives........who created a record deficit. Not involved in nation building.........while doing it in Iraq. And a president who was actually surprised that gas is 4 dollars a gallon on the west coast.......this is before he was taped tap dancing with a huge smile on his face.

That is what sounds out of touch to me.

And to me, getting people to the polls who have never believed in the democratic process is a mark of a great leader. What I find silly is someone who counts her "35 years of experience" even though she's been a senator from NY for 6 years? And I'm not talking about being married to Bill, because if that is the case.....

Why haven't Betty Ford, Nancy Reagan, Lady Bird Johnson or Jackie Kennedy not ever ran for president?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kwing,

I wasn't crying when I said it, but I find it interesting that the republicans are pushing for hillary when majority don't even like her. The reason is they can easily smear her campaign, with obama that won't work. I have to agree with you about obama though, he talks about change too much instead of discussing the issues. I happen to like Hillarys ideas more. So we are stuck back in square one with either voting for the more likeable candidate or the more experienced candidate? An when were the dems pushing for Romney? Because all the liberal talks shows I listen to don't even like him. If anything the dems were pushing for McCain and making fun of his age/100 years at war strategy/no plan for the economy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • DAYS OF OUR LIVES 10-1-1976 Doug & Julie's wedding #1 Taped on 9-16-1976, Episode #2740
    • I have just uploaded 91 mp3 files, audio only, radio episodes of Guiding Light. https://archive.org/details/guiding-light-ep-0857 Guiding Light Radio Episodes For many years Guiding Light was broadcast on radio. These are some of those episodes, audio only, of course. They are mp3 files.
    • I don't know if this will be useful. If it's not please scroll on by. If it is, great! This is Part 1 of 3.  Search For Tomorrow. (1977). Daytime TV Library Series No. 7.   Between 1975 and 1977, Daytime TV Magazine, the leading publication dedicated to US daytime programs, began a series of special editions dedicated specifically to one serial.  In early 1977, they released issue #7 which focused on the longest running serial at that time, “Search for Tomorrow”.   The publication contained interviews with key cast members and productions staff, such as the producers, directors, writer and costume designer.  It included a synopsis of the story from origin to that point, lots of pictures and a key item: What it took to make an episode of the show.   At the time, SFT was enjoying a revitalization after four years mediocre ratings.  The new producer, Mary-Ellis Bunim rose up the ranks from secretary to producer in late 1973.  Under her guidance, ratings jumped.  In the 1973-1974 ratings, “Search” placed 9th with a 7.7.  In the 1974-1975 season, it rose to a 4th with a 9.4.  At the time of this edition, it hovered around 5th with an 8.6 rating, winning its time period and coming in third of the five CBS soaps. Some of the questions posed were:             What did the title mean to the actors?             What is your opinion about the Emmys?             What character would they want to switch with?             Did the actors feel there was a bias against acting on a soap?             When did you start on the show?             What motivates your character? I will cover some here & some in other articles. Today I will cover how the show got on the air: The Show On The Air – Step by step how SFT got on the air in 1976. At the time, “Search for Tomorrow” was taped at the CBS Studio 51 & 54 on the lower West Side of Manhattan (probably the studio at W. 26th Street that was a later home to “Guiding Light”). 8:00 AM – The director of the day (there were three at the time), the production assistant and actors in the first act arrive.  Actors arrived based on the acts they were in between 8:00 AM and 9:45 AM and went to the rehearsal hall. 9:00 AM – Makeup artist and hair stylist arrive (there was one of each except for special episodes where full cast were part of the episode). 9:00 AM – Makeup artist and hair stylist arrive (there was one of each except for special episodes where full cast were part of the episode). 9:30 AM – Producer Mary-Ellis Bunim and Associate Producer Bob Getz arrive and go to their offices on the second floor. 9:45 AM – 10:15 AM – Director of the day checks sets in studio on the third floor. Actors begin make-up and hair sessions. 10:15 AM – 11:45 AM – This is the time for first rehearsal on set (called FAX) with cameras. Blocking and camera angles are perfected. 11:45 AM – 12:15 PM – First run-through in studio.  Producer and associate producer watch action in their office via CCTV.  Rough edges are smoothed out. 12:15 PM – 12:45 PM – Actors lunch break.  Notes made by producer and associate producer during run through are given to director in production office. 1:00 PM – 1:20 PM – Directors give notes to actors and studio personnel. Final touches to actors’ hair and make-up. 1:30 PM – 2:00 PM – Dress rehearsal.  Producers watch on CCTV and make final notes. 2:00 PM – 2:15 PM – Producers give final notes to directors in control room. 2:15 PM – 2:30 PM – Final notes given to actors and studio personnel by director. Notes on production elements (i.e., does liquor look real? Are props in assigned locations?) given by associate producer. 2:30 PM – 3:00 PM – Taping the episode. (SFT taped only two days before air). 3:00 PM – 3:15 PM – Tapes are checked.  If all is OK, cast is excused. Thus, “Search for Tomorrow” put on a show in LESS than SEVEN AND A HALF HOURS!  This time does not include the homework the actors and directors have to do before arriving at the studio.  Directors stated it took eight to twelve hours of homework for every episode they direct.  The producer has to spend time reading rough drafts and editing scripts, making notes for the writer, working on long-term story and character development. The associate producer spends outside office hours, organizing all facets of production elements and making sure they are all intact.  On a daily basis, auditions are held, attendance at script consultations and going over the following day’s schedule.  With luck, the producer can leave the studio between 6:00 and 7:00 PM. Written by DM James Fairbanks, Posted with permission. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • My take is that this is Audra manipulating Kyle. OC, it's not plausible that any of the things you mentioned could happen in months, much less days! Audra is a master at pushing people's buttons. Let's face it, Kyle isn't the brightest bulb thanks to Jack.  
    • And while I'm doing catch-up, it's good to see you did as well. And YES. This is how May Sweeps SHOULD be. A story climaxing. Another A story being built up as we did with the aftermath of the first A story climaxing. B plots being built up...actually moving and being interested in most of them...if not all. hehe. New story being started. And even the C plots are moving, too. 
    • It definitely did. Nothing major, but I clocked the minor changes too. Passions did something similar with its theme in the later years and people thought I was crazy, but the nuances are there if you're paying attention. 
    • What? A nice little mini-marathon of catching up before work.    YES, PLEASE. 
    • I guess they copied literally everything from that C&R scene, the dialogue etc 
    • And even then...you have to wait a couple of weeks to be sure he's actually dead.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy