Jump to content

2008: The Directors and Writers Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

You saw where innovation got us. Freshness won't come from a different structure, mostly because I have no faith in these people inventing a better one. Look at what happened to General Hospital: when Claire Labine wrote for it, on average it had 18 scenes, sometimes 20. But now that Guza is helming it, it's pacing on steroids: I think Kay Alden said it had something like 36 scenes, maybe I'm mistaken, I haven't counted.

Well, the problem is that the Bell's shows have a very specific way of telling stories and these individuals would have to be very, very talented. They would either have to learn really fast or they would have to be huge fans of the show. Honestly, there are breakdown writers on other shows I like, but I'm not sure if being an excellent BDW on one show means being an excellent BDW on any show.

  • Replies 4.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

While that's true, but at this point, I'd settle for writers who know how to structure and write for a soap opera. Not those who think they're writing a flashy and crappy primetime show, like most on that team. :rolleyes:

  • Members
Posted

What sort of a structure for Y&R do you want? Like, I would need you to tell me the number of stories that the show would feature each day, the number of scenes, number of acts... The basics.

P. S. Jim Houghton could also return to write outlines.

  • Members
Posted

I mean basic things, like longer scenes, longer conversation, more end tags (something that has all but disappeared from Y&R), etc.

These days, the scenes all go by so fast and we barely have time to digest anything. That's not the way a soap opera is supposed to be set up. We have Latham's primetime friends to thank for that.

Y&R's always featured an insane number of stories when compared to other soaps. Bill Bell used to have as many as 7 storylines going on at one time, I believe.

I want to feel the charcters and their thought processes again, you know?

  • Members
Posted

Well, yes, an "insane" number of stories, but with a very specific structure. Stories 1-3 might be in their final phases, Stories 4-5 might be in the middle, and Stories 6-7 would just be starting. Stories would last for years. What this meant was a very stead diet of distinctly timed crescendos.

(It also tended to mean islanded character groups, so as not to mess up the timing of individual stories).

In the modern era, this can't work. (It could, but it won't be allowed to). Why? Because for stories 6-7 to peak two years from now, there needs to be a very slow, methodical buildup. Modern viewers find that boring. (Some of what people have been complaining about since 12/26/07 is precisely that she is going for a slow, methodical buildup...causing some viewers to say 'nothing is happening').

In addition, nobody has patience anymore for a story that takes 2 years to conclude. They call that "rambling" or "no payoff"...because they are more used to payoff in a tighter time frame.

Now, as for scenes, I don't understand why there can't be a mix? In other words, if modern audiences need 36 scenes in an episode...give it to them...MOST DAYS.

But, if there is a story beat that requires emotion....say, Victoria is consoling her mother...let it play out. Let it be a five minute scene. The length of that scene will give it extra intensity.

I don't understand why it can't all be adapted for specific story needs.

  • Members
Posted

Of course, it can't. People want events, stuff happening. They don't want three consecutive episodes containing people talking to each other about how f!cked up their emotional lives are. Or those genuine, family scenes.

Well, Bill Bell changed the number of scenes in an episode depending on the story. But he never went over 25.

  • Members
Posted

Well, Mark, it's been two years since Gloria's skin cream fiasco. If she's finally exposed soon and sent to prison where she's brutally attacked, that will be enough of a payoff for me. ;)

  • Members
Posted

LOL. I actually think some version of this will happen.

Now that she is tangling with murderer David Chow, I think she will be on the receiving end of an attempted murder.

I do think there will be a reveal of the cream at some point...maybe if Jack starts to get Jabot back, and Ashley comes home. You're right though...this will be a rare exception to short stories...this is taking YEARS to unfold.

  • Members
Posted

But none of the recent additions have been FOH's. However, I assume most, if not all of these people were hired prior to Hogan coming on board. It will be interesting to see what happens after he's credited.

But I really don't think he'll be doing any hiring or firing, he might have some say, but it's ultimately Maria's decision.

  • Members
Posted

That's what I really found different under LML's reign of terror. There wasn't any islanding of characters...everyone bled into everyone else's stories so it didn't appear that there was a solid definition between each storyline.

I distinctly recall feeling as if Y&R was a soap about several different storylines that didn't intersect...as if Genoa City was a big town where everyone DIDN'T know everyone else's business.

For example, the Kay/Jill storyline rarely intersected with anything else...it was just Jeanne Cooper and Jess Walton. And then, Jill and the Abbotts were a distinct group, Victor and Nikki were distinct...it wasn't everyone having one big clusterf--k at the GCAC!

As far as the structure of Y&R I want the max to be 22 scenes per show. Longer scenes afford the writers the ability to actually say something...further, there should only be 2 storylines hitting their peak at one time...there needs to be a graduating scale to storylines, that's what Y&R did well and that's why Y&R always did well in Sweeps because storylines were timed properly....there need to be end tags, more thoughtful dialog. Yes, the OTT melodramatic dialog I love, I don't care how bad some say it is, I live for it!

  • Members
Posted

Bill Bell made a mistake in that he didn't mentor any other writers besides Kay Alden and John F. Smith. He should have picked someone else.

  • Members
Posted

Yes, they were close because their professional careers stated at the same time, basically. I think it was in some advertising company in Chicago, where they both served as copywriters. Later when Bill left, he took Jerry with him.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I did not care, just clarifying that was the discussion point. If there are ice cream bars in Statesville I am sure there is a full spa
    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy