Jump to content

DAYS: Why Drake and John?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

A couple of things have interested me, and I wonder what posters here think. Do you think that Drake was written out for budget reasons, or Hogan Sheffer didn't want to write for him? Or, if he was written out because of the budget, why do you think he was picked instead of say, Deidre, Kristian, Peter, Mary Beth, or Stephen? If someone had to go, who would you have picked?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

If someone had to go I would have picked getting rid of Bryan Dattilo, Julie Pinson and whoever else of the younger set I needed to get rid of to add up to Drake's salary IF I had to pick.

But I don't think this was a money issue. I think Hogan didn't want to write for John and Ed Scott and/or Corday finally gave him the greenlight to do what he has wanted to do since last winter, which is kill off John Black.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Plus John's death (if he stays dead) should create a ton of story and is turning out some stellar stuff already. People need to deal with it. People die all the time. No one got this worked up when 10+ characters were killed off in ridiculous ways (hello Alice!) yeah they all came back but I won't get into that mess.

I would still kill off John. I wouldn't change a thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To answer the first post, I wouldn't have killed off Dee, Thats for sure. That would be the ultimate stupidity.

Why Drake and John, I don't know. I don't know if Hogan knew how to write for him, or just didn't care to. I think he really picks his faves, and doesn't really care what we think. John is a very central character, and he is going to be missed. BUT.....this has been the best week in ages for this show. I felt emotion today. I haven't felt emotion watching Days in a very, very long time.

I will miss Drake, but this is good television right now. It's going to hurt down the line, but I'm glued for the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One of my litmus tests for killing off a character is to ask myself "will this show wish it had the character back in five years?"

A great example is Search for Tomorrow. Mary Stuart had a son back in the early 1960s that Frank and Doris Hursley cavalierly killed off to drive up the ratings. Made for great drama in the short term, but the show suffered down the line because Jo didn't have a son to play off of that could have been involved in romantic storylines. Later writers tried to make up for it by introducing Bruce Carson, her grown ward, but it wasn't the same.

Y&R is already feeling the effects of killing off Camryn Grimes' character. Same for GH. Wonder if they wish A.J. were back on the canvas?

When AW killed off Frankie, I was one of the few who cheered because I wanted Cass to return to his bachelor ways (plus I preferred Cass with Kathleen, but that's another story). Then I saw the Nielsens go straight down after she died and I went "oh oh".

Short-term, everyone is absolutely correct. It's making for really good drama. Long-term, the show might regret what it did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When Hogan first came on board, he indicated that he had big plans for Marlena. He talked about making her the show's matriarch and turning her into an independent woman again. There was no mention of John.

Then Drake and his family had the incident with the psychotic intruder in their back yard. It was after all this that John got shot and languished in a coma for five months. I think Hogan may have wanted to kill John earlier but kept him around until the intruder drama had died down some. Even Drake had no clue why he was being kept in that coma for so long.

This week has been great drama, but I'm sad to see this character go. I can only hope that this means Hogan has big plans for the character of Marlena. It's just hard for me to imagine this after the shabby treatment she's had since Hogan picked up his pen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
What? I remember people were plenty upset when that happend.

To answer the question I really don't think Drake is leaving because of money issues. And I would pick Shelley Hennig, Trevor Donovan, and Marcus Patrick and maybe JKJ before Drake. I don't know if all their salaries would make up for what Drake gets/got. But at the moment I can't think of anyone else I'd like to see of the cast list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, it had a bit to do with budgett. Im sure DH comes with a price, a huge one prob. and i dont think all the minor cuts could have helped the budgett as much as his big one. I also think it had a lot to do with Marlena. I think HS wants to take Marlena the Viki (oltl) route. And im all for it.

as far as long term vs short term... idk. i think right now days needs to worry about... right now. cuz if they regret it in 5 years, at least they are still around to regret it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Very rarely does a show's decision to kill off a beloved main character to generate temporary story ever outweigh the possibilties that they have long-term by keeping said character around.

One year from now, I'll probably be looking back and this and thinking, "Damn it! Why?"

For now, though... in the moment... all I can do it sit back and enjoy all of the amazing material that we're being given on screen, because this is some of the best stuff I've seen. Wondering why and worrying about the repercussions is THEIR job, not mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ITA. I believe this is the story that Hogan wanted to tell from December 2006 on, but certain circumstances kept him from doing it -- the intruder drama and not getting Joe M. or Thaao P. on contract with the show at the time. I'm starting to think that everything we saw from January until recently was something quickly thrown together until Hogan got the OK to go with what he originally wanted to write in the first place. Everything that happened in those months during John's coma I think will be forgotten with John's death and the show will start again in the direction originally envisioned by Sheffer when he came on board. I'm not exactly OK with this, but I do believe that is what's going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of the big 6, Drake was the best one to go. Steve and Kayla were gone a long time so are relatively new and fresh with a lot of story potential. Bo and Hope are huge fan favorites, have a lot of family to interact with, are one of the last connections to the Horton family and are slightly younger than John and Marlena. It would be beyond foolish to get rid of Marlena as in many ways she's the face of DAYS and familiar to even people who don't watch the show. That leaves John, who has been around a long time and has such a convoluted history he would be more difficult to write for than the other five.

Now, I'm not saying I would have killed off John if I were writing this soap. He's a beloved character and Drake has been loyal to DAYS for many years. There are others I would prefer gone--Jett, Stephanie, Philip, NIck, Lucas (I know, wishful thinking!), Roman, even Kate and Billie (love both of them, but they haven't had a good story in years). We are getting some incredible shows because of this death; I just hope they keep the momentum going and John's death is not in vain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
    • Hotel was The Love Boat on land but a little soapier. I will forever maintain that Hotel was a time slot hit. I don't believe that 1983/84 Hotel was a better show than Knots Landing.
    • The Golden Girls key episodes by ratings September 14, 1985: The Engagement (series premiere), rating 25.0, #1 Season highs February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 February 6, 1988: My Brother, My Father; rating 24.6 November 26, 1988: Sophia's Wedding (Part 2), rating 24.3, #1 September 23, 1989: Sick and Tired (Part 1) (season 5 premiere), rating 23.5 January 12, 1991: Sisters of the Bride, rating 19.3 May 9, 1992: One Flew Out of the Cuckoo's Nest (series finale), rating 18.9 Season lows October 19, 1985: The Triangle, rating 18.6 May 16, 1987: Empty Nests (season 2 finale), rating 17.8 February 20, 1988: And Ma Makes Three, rating 18.0 April 29, 1989: Rites of Spring, rating 18.7 April 28, 1990: All Bets are Off, rating 15.8 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 Ten highest-rated episodes October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 January 3, 1987: The Sisters, rating 27.0 November 22, 1986: Family Affair, rating 26.8 January 10, 1987: The Stan Who Came to Dinner, rating 26.6 January 24, 1987: Before and After, rating 26.4 February 28, 1987: Whose Face is This, Anyway?; rating 25.8 September 27, 1986: End of the Curse (season 2 premiere), rating 25.6 November 15, 1986: Big Daddy's Little Lady, rating 25.3 February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 Ten lowest-rated episodes October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 September 28, 1991: The Case of the Libertine Belle, rating 10.9 October 19, 1991: Where's Charlie?, rating 11.0 February 15, 1992: Ebbtide VI: The Wrath of Stan, rating 11.3 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 December 14, 1991: The Pope's Ring, rating 11.7 April 25, 1992: Home Again, Rose (Part 1); rating 12.3 October 5, 1991: Beauty and the Beast, rating 12.7 November 2, 1991: Dateline: Miami, rating 12.7 December 7, 1991: From Here to the Pharmacy, rating 12.8
    • The timing is strange, though. How far in advance would they normally be on location? The Achille Lauro hijacking was on October 7, 1985. Nancy had arrived in Egypt in the storyline by October 18. But the character of Hawk, Chris' Native American friend from Arizona, had already appeared onscreen by September and brought a letter telling Chris to be in Egypt by October 25th.  Why did they already have the link to Arizona before the reason to cancel the shoot in Egypt?  The dust and the jar it came in were from Egypt though. Nancy bought it there and sent it to Mac as a gift before she came back to the states and followed Chris to Arizona.
    • Actually that is not what happened. Nor is the timing right for it to have been. We learned from a WOST interview with Pete Lemay  in 2006, which can be found on YT, that it was Fred Silverman's idea to do the 90 minute show. I don't know how much you know about him but he had these amazing successes as head of daytime at both ABC & at CBS. Then he came to NBC where basically everything he touched turned NOT TO GOLD but to shite. Some of the most expensive shows ever produced up to that time were huge flops. Although even he, like a broken clock, could be right on occasion. However, as we know, he was not right about the 90 minute show. As a matter of fact, afterward,  NBC programmers, who worked FOR him, were asked why they did it & they were quoted as saying it was because they couldn't think of anything else to try. It was a stupid idea from a man who had reached the point where he was throwing anything at the wall to see if it would stick.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy