Jump to content

Could NBC legally cancel DAYS before March 2009?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator
Posted

OR......

What if SONY tells CBS and NBC that both DAYS/Y&R come in a package deal! Whoever wants the #1 show has to take DAYS!! Ooohhhhh....... :lol:

I really believe if Sony threaten CBS to take away Y&R, they would so take DAYS and dump the P&G soaps.

  • Members
Posted

Sure, maybe. But that is called a suicide mission. Because you can damned well be sure that viewers of GL/ATWT won't tune in to support them. And with Days having such a different style, the risk of alienation is great, anyway, since CBS soaps tend to skew older.

And add in the expected loss of ratings upon a soap switching networks, and Days would be lucky to hit a 1.5.

  • Members
Posted

Days probably won't move to another network in 2009. If it did, it'd be a drastically scaled-back version, i.e. not resembling anything like it is today.

Sony would have some cojones to threaten CBS like that, because, seriously, the networks would love to get rid of their soaps. They bring more problems than profit at this point. (And, frankly, soaps are not going to go through a ratings renaissance anytime soon. Can you see the ratings two years from now? A 1.9 would be like a pipe dream). So, CBS could easily say to Sony: "Fine, take Y&R with you. We'll get rid of the two P&G problems and let B&B die and be done with everything."

The daytime climate will not be able to support acquisitions like that (Days moving elsewhere), it'll only be able to support cancellations.

  • Members
Posted

Toups is right about one thing...Sony is not going to let Days die and either is Corday.

It's going to end up somewhere but where is the question. I am choosing not to think about it. I just want Days to do well creatively, get some good buzz, maybe see some increases (not getting my hopes up), and then, hopefully, someone will see that with network support the show can surge.

  • Members
Posted

Days moving somewhere else and being cut back... i think it could work. and id love to see it. cut the cast in half, make the show 1/2 hr. it may work out.

besides, the days of today is not the days we all loved. this week aside.

  • Members
Posted

Nope, because Frons/ABCD would want complete ownership, as ABC/Soapnet owns their soaps. Sure, Soapnet also runs Y&R/Days, but that is after the first airing on CBS/NBC. In terms of outright first-run broadcast/ownership, Frons would demand ownership, and you know Corday/Sony won't sell. And ABC would not want other companies dictating how to run its shows.

  • Members
Posted

B&B is one of the most watched shows in the world. its not going anywhere. and as much as Y&R sux, nither is it.

I could actually see CBS letting ATWT & GL go and bringing days on as a 1/2 hr after B&B

  • Members
Posted

What I don't get is the comment of how much money "Days" makes for Sony. Hell, I don't get this about all the soaps that air in other countries, to be honest. If it has all these sources of revenue, why would the budget be SO low ? It wouldn't need to require on American networks alone for money, right? Or sweeps periods, no? Does Sony, for instance, just suck up all the money without giving a good percentage to -- HELLO! -- the show that helped them earn that money?! And if so, that's SICK and frankly, EVIL.

  • Members
Posted

Does SONY have a controlling stake in Y&R? I doubt Bell Productions would be happy having their show used as a bargaining chip.

In dollar terms, the revenue from foreign syndication wouldn't go very far to finance a US-based show. Most foreign networks buy 3-4 year old episodes, which are much cheaper than original programming. I'd imagine SONY does contribute some of this to production costs but DAYS is still heavily reliant on NBC's license fee.

  • Members
Posted

Sony is biggest share holder when Y&R is concerned, the Bells are second, and Corday has like 1%.

However, Sony can never pressure CBS into taking Days, since Y&R's contract with CBS is up for negotiation in 2010, a full year after NBC would've canceled Days. It would be empty threats if Sony tried to pull some crap like that on CBS in 2009. Also, I don't see Sony pressuring CBS either, especially since they have a much better reputation with CBS, than NBC. Days' contract negotiations have always gone bad, even when the show was generating high ratings. I hear Days has a long history of going over budget too. Y&R, on the other hand, has a history of smooth contract negations and handles its budget better than the other soaps.

Honestly, CBS has vested interests in GL and ATWT, and soaps that switch networks have a history of losing over half their original audience. It's not likely that Days will find a home on either CBS or ABC.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Creatively, he probably should have stayed with The Doctors, where he stood out as an antihero lead. Not sure what happened with GH. He didn't have the same impact. Was it bad writing, not clicking with co-stars? Didn't they gave him a boat load of money to join GH in 1976? Was Mark Dante just a toned-down version of Nick Bellini? Were they basically the same character?
    • All I can think of is if a lot of big names were leaving around that time she wanted him back as a stopgap, although I have never seen any real evidence that he was popular with GH viewers.
    • I loved watching Shanice hand Leslie her ass and finally shutting her up. It was so good. I also love Martin & Smitty's family.  Anita has to have some sort of plan giving Leslie the tickets to mail for Winterfest. She has to be setting her up for a fall. It's pretty obvious to me Vernon is not cheating with Sharon. I think Sharon is helping him with his terrible singing voice for Winterfest. I still believe Bill & Dani are endgame but I love Dani & Andre too. I am definitely enjoying this story. And making Hayley a black widow is a nice twist.
    • Sorry for the spam. Wasn't sure where to put this, it's from Tony Geary's husband's IG. Tony watching Genie and Maurice on Mo's show.
    • This show is really trundling along BTW. When is someone going to show up to slit Beastmaster's throat or crack the whip on metrosexual Sidwell? (BTW, openly presenting this cheery bon vivant as casually bisexual would at least be something vaguely diverting.) At least kill Brennan by year's end. I'm bored.
    • She told Vanessa to "DOUBLE her offer" on the Jarvis house.  The Jarvis family accepted the doubled price.  Assuming the house has an appraised value of $2,000,000, she's theoretically paid the Jarvis family $4,000,000 for the house.  The bank would loan Leslie 80% of the appraised value ($1,600,000), and Leslie had to pay the balance with cash at closing --- $2,200,000.  She only had ONE million.  Where the hell did she get the rest?!  And now she's got contractors working on the house all day & half the night.  Who's paying THEM?  I keep thinking all this will crash around her.  Either that or the writers have absolutely no idea the limits of a million dollars.  Sounds like a "lot of money", but it obviously ain't when we look at Leslie's spending since she got that million dollar check in August.     
    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy