Jump to content

Days: Sorority Storyline *RUMOR*


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

If anything happens to Stephanie, have Steve or Kayla involved...Chelsea get Bo and Billie involved...have Bo, Billie and Steve go after the rapist and vow revenge whilst Kayla tries to urge them to leave it to the police to follow out proceedings against the rapist whilst Bo and Steve want to kill him. Make it a story that not only affects the teens, but their parents' relationships and see them argue over how to handle the situation and struggle to come to terms with the fact that their kids are fully grown now and they can't protect them as best they would like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can actually see something like this happening. They already have Billie involved at the college with her security system. Jett is going to be there as a security guard. Nick is working there as a professor. Belle, Chelsea, and Stephanie are going to college there. Plus the soriority sisters that we have been getting to know. Add to that the fact that Shawn is going to be a cop. Bo, Hope, and Steve could easily get involved also into the investigation. Max will also be involved through Steph and Morgan. That is a large part of the cast involved. Of course, we all know who the rapist will end up being!!!!! I'm not even going to say it! Oh yeah, I'm sure that Chloe will enter school also!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It will be kind of revolting to take a show that is currently dark and make it yet darker by raping more characters. Isn't it bad enough the Sami has already been raped twice? Are they trying to ensure that every woman on the show has been raped at least once?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't see this coming at all (so bravo, writers), but the rapist is SO Ford. Yeah, he seemed like a normal guy at first; but he started to show his true colors on Monday, slowly but truly.

First, with that DIGUSTING "It's for charity, right?" line, which obviously was more about Cordy than it was about the real charity. He was knocking her looks. Then with the whole, 'this is not the same girl who bid on me last night' thing. He's just obsessed with looks. He's a dog. We're slowly seeing that.

And it's just a few short steps from being dog to being a rapist.

Don't worry, guys. It's not Dr. Rebert. But it is Ford. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the girl who plays Stephanie is cute and that she's an interesting actor

--but I just don't buy her as Steve and Kayla's daughter.

I thought the redheaded more actressy looking girl they had before was perfect as

Steve and Kayla's daughter.

She was never really given a chance.

Also, I'm going to get a lot of flack about this

(sigh)

but I like the guy who plays Jeremy. I think "Days" should keep him and get rid

of Jett instead.

The problem with all these younger actors is that they're not being written for.

The guy who plays Jeremy isn't a "great actor"---but he has star quality and he was

very impressive in today's eppy with Maggie, Nick and the kids.

He could be very likeable and draw younger viewers.

Given a good story, he could be worked with.

They've ruined Chelsea by making her a heroine. She's so much more interesting as

a scheming bitch. Though I love her acting, she really has no story worth noting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • And that revolving door has led to the cancellation of so many daytime dramas since the early-1980s.   Very sad.   
    • That's a good point: if a show's state is not mentioned for many years, it's easier for the revolving door of never-ending newbies in charge to miss out on or get confused about previously-established facts.
    • IMO I get a brotherly/sisterly vibe from Kat/Jacob
    • Yes, the locale officially switched to Illinois in the early-1980s.  But I was watching daily during the entire Lemay era, and I'm fairly confident Bay City was never referenced as being in Michigan in any of Lemay's scripts. Agreed, Lemay did care about AW's past -- and used the past as subtext for many characters.  But it is unfortunate he chose never to mention (or perhaps was unaware of) the Michigan connection.  So by not mentioning it, this may be when that connection was lost for TPTB.   
    • Marquita Goings' wig was going to same a week or two ago.
    • Forgot to post something here

      Please register in order to view this content

        King of the Hill Voice Actor Johnathan Joss was gunned down and shot dead this past Sunday at 59 years old in Texas.  Here's the video of someone recording Joss' last moments before he was murdered.  This Monday past, the suspect turned himself to the police station and currently placed on house arrest until his Trial on August. 
    • I was hoping the Articulettes  would be more like Klymaxx then the Supremes.  Talk about inspiration for a soapy type of stories  (one of the bandmates tried to use the name in order to perform, internal fighting over who was the lead, and the same bandmate that tried to use the name of the group tried to include their name as a song writer... and almost got an award for songwriting). I could see Sharon/Tracy/Anita fighting over all that... and Sharon trying to use the name Articulettes in order to perform and big bad bully Anita and Vernon block it from happening. Shanice is like Amy Vining... but BTG... Amy Vining had a life beyond the nurses station.
    • I don't believe Lemay was the one who negated the fact that the show was originally set in Michigan. Aside from a few curious character mutations, he did seem to care about the past. I think AW switched the local to Illinois in the 1980s or later. I don't think TPTB always knew or remembered the past well enough to give new headwriters full accurate information, anyway. Lemay wrote a story about Pat Randolph killing a predator named Greg Bernard who was targeting her daughter. The writer referred to a teenaged Pat killing her boyfriend (Tom Baxter) by stabbing him, as she later killed Greg. But in reality, Pat had shot Tom with a gun, so TPTB were lax in knowing or correctly relating established facts to the current scribe. Is the specific murder weapon of a long-gone character a vital component 15 years after the fact? Probably not to most viewers, but for those who had been watching way back when, little mistakes like this can be grating. I'm not devastated that AW changed Bay City's home state along the way, but I see this as another grating point that a little research could have prevented. Soap viewers have loooooong memories, LOL!
    • Ooopphh , I just watched my recording and thought, what's going on there. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy